Discovery Gaming Community
ID Changes/Rework Discussion Thread - Printable Version

+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery General (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=23)
+--- Thread: ID Changes/Rework Discussion Thread (/showthread.php?tid=137859)

Pages: 1 2 3


RE: ID Changes/Rework Discussion Thread - Lythrilux - 04-07-2016

(04-07-2016, 07:19 PM)Snak3 Wrote: [21:03:31] PERSON: lol this thread is the new way to get faction perks
[21:03:43] PERSON: Without effort or trouble

Good point. Factions are asking for expanded ZoI without any visible effort towards that end. Along other few things.

I'd disagree. At least for most cases. Factions asking for expanded ZoI in that thread are doing so with RP justification (which is actually the basis for ZoI expansion perks). Or it's to remedy an error that proves detrimental to their activity or lore. Faction perks should be used for additions, not for trying to fix problems that honestly should be done via a Player request (but the staff can be very picky if it's not labelled as a perk). Hence why in my opinion it's entirely suitable for people to be proposing IDs to fix aforementioned problems.

Of course, it's the staff who decide at the end of the day what floats and what doesn't.


RE: ID Changes/Rework Discussion Thread - Garrett Jax - 04-07-2016

(04-07-2016, 07:19 PM)Snak3 Wrote: [21:03:31] PERSON: lol this thread is the new way to get faction perks
[21:03:43] PERSON: Without effort or trouble

Good point. Factions are asking for expanded ZoI without any visible effort towards that end. Along other few things.

I foresee much disappointment in the near future.


RE: ID Changes/Rework Discussion Thread - Pinko - 04-07-2016

Fix Unioner ID, allow them to shoot Republican shipping pls


RE: ID Changes/Rework Discussion Thread - Lythrilux - 04-07-2016

If you have a proposal, go suggest it. Anyone can make a proposal.


RE: ID Changes/Rework Discussion Thread - nOmnomnOm - 04-07-2016

(04-07-2016, 08:58 PM)Lythrilux Wrote: If you have a proposal, go suggest it. Anyone can make a proposal.

(04-04-2016, 06:13 PM)Drrobe Wrote: For the next two weeks, we'd like representatives for each of the ID's, faction leader or not, follow the template below with their suggestions.

but i guess there is no representative for Unioners


RE: ID Changes/Rework Discussion Thread - Lythrilux - 04-08-2016

http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=137721&pid=1763010#pid1763010
For public awareness this post is a complete joke and Impy made it only to spite Core/me. There's the distinct element of a complete ignorance of Core lore and history. I hope the staff don't take it seriously.


RE: ID Changes/Rework Discussion Thread - moebus - 04-08-2016

(04-07-2016, 07:04 PM)Captain Wrote: well depends on the definition of unlawful,

piracy is an unlawful act by house governments,
because it is against the law,

smuggling is as well within those houses against the law thus an unlawful act,

think of the country you live in, it has laws in place, some countries ban prostitution,
meaning if you prostitute you are acting against the law aka unlawfull

hopefully that clarifies the "cannot participate in unlawful actions" part

I agree, but it becomes complex to apply in game since for smuggling you have to know the status of all commodities in every Sirius region.
In my opinion each statement of the ID must short and be easy to apply without the need to go on the forums for additional information.


RE: ID Changes/Rework Discussion Thread - WesternPeregrine - 04-10-2016

I don't believe it would be appropriate to have any faction with the capability to outdo the Bounty Hunters Guild in terms of bounty hunting allowances. UC is just one of the (maybe the only one proposed) situations.
Sure thing BHG can do only lawful (and Council) bounties, but others who are able to take the unlawful side should be limited by a zoi at least.

Impy noticed a similar situation on my Hogosha proposal, which I'm on the way to fix.


RE: ID Changes/Rework Discussion Thread - Pinko - 04-10-2016

(04-10-2016, 10:16 PM)WPeregrine Wrote:
I don't believe it would be appropriate to have any faction with the capability to outdo the Bounty Hunters Guild in terms of bounty hunting allowances. UC is just one of the (maybe the only one proposed) situations.
Sure thing BHG can do only lawful (and Council) bounties, but others who are able to take the unlawful side should be limited by a zoi at least.

Impy noticed a similar situation on my Hogosha proposal, which I'm on the way to fix.

The thing is, the UC are Gallia's BHG, even lawful-wise.


RE: ID Changes/Rework Discussion Thread - Impyness - 04-10-2016

Right, but UC taking bounties in Rheinland or Liberty is a bit odd.

Especially when on the reverse side with the current proposals BHG cant actually take bounties outside of its incredibly specific ZOI. I'll be suggesting changes for both most likely, it's just p weird to note.