+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery General (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=23)
+--- Thread: Vet talk: Unwritten 'rules' on pvp engagements |RANT (/showthread.php?tid=138677)
RE: Vet talk: Unwritten 'rules' on pvp engagements |RANT - Backo - 04-30-2016
I watched the fight, if it could be called such. You missed to add into your paragraph that running away to resupply and repair and returning 3 times in a row is also QQ worthy.
RE: Vet talk: Unwritten 'rules' on pvp engagements |RANT - Silver - 04-30-2016
OOoooooooh Daaaaaaamn.
Vasko kickin' it up. And i know he was watchin' because he gave me the play by play.
<3
Vasko kickin' it up. And i know he was watchin' because he gave me the play by play.
<3
RE: Vet talk: Unwritten 'rules' on pvp engagements |RANT - nOmnomnOm - 04-30-2016
(04-30-2016, 03:50 PM)Bloodl1ke Wrote: I watched the fight, if it could be called such. You missed to add into your paragraph that running away to resupply and repair and returning 3 times in a row is also QQ worthy.Oh yes good you mentioned that.
So yeah in the rules there is no mention you cannot do this action.
In many pvps I have been in I have seen this happen. I had also been into fights myself when being ganked and still managing to do damage or making people loose all their equipment to then have them go back and come resupplied.
So is that wrong then?
Is there an unwritten rule that says you cannot resupply?
I have not complained about it on my side when done to me since it is in the rules to do so. Sure it was a bit 'unfair' but whatever.
That is how I see it.
And for the record.
I had stated I should have been in that fight on my unarmored arrow.
At least then i would have done much better as i was only able to dodge fire and not able to hit anyway.
My pvp sucked against small kusari ships.
RE: Vet talk: Unwritten 'rules' on pvp engagements |RANT - nOmnomnOm - 04-30-2016
(04-30-2016, 03:42 PM)Auzari Wrote: can you at least put some kind of constructive sentence and header to explain what the hell you're on about?Sorry.
legitimately.
the way you formated your *long* post makes me want to flip you off and ignore your thread. it's really tiring to read, get to the point.
I take your flip and flip you a pancake for your troubles.
on top it says |RANT
So... sorry if my spew of words offends you.
I hope next time you wont be easily too offended.
RE: Vet talk: Unwritten 'rules' on pvp engagements |RANT - Kauket - 04-30-2016
I'm more offended at the screen for displaying it. And for it just being a wall of text. So hardly me being offended in any regard.
But I see here this is a subtle message of whining at a certain pvp event.
RE: Vet talk: Unwritten 'rules' on pvp engagements |RANT - Wesker - 04-30-2016
Just right click on enemy and you win simple.
RE: Vet talk: Unwritten 'rules' on pvp engagements |RANT - nOmnomnOm - 04-30-2016
(04-30-2016, 04:03 PM)Auzari Wrote: I'm more offended at the screen for displaying it. And for it just being a wall of text. So hardly me being offended in any regard.
But I see here this is a subtle message of whining at a certain pvp event.
Nope I was rather the least person complaining about said pvp event.
Sure, I dont understand this new hugging gate phenomena.
I had seen it being done by other people before but i am not complaining that i got shot because of it.
I am only complaining of the idea that it is considered 'bad' to do it.
I cannot see why.
So sure. You could say that, but this is also from other pvp events as well.
it is literally impossible to not be referencing to some pvp event that happened.
Like...
Think about it.
This isnt the first time for example that I suck around in TS to listen to the rant that Gbs are terrible and the players that fly them are horrible people.
I think you can take it from that.
Anyway, perhaps if it was someone else who said the same thing then you would read this differently.
So, whatever. You can think what you think in the end about me.
(04-30-2016, 04:03 PM)Wesker Wrote: Just right click on enemy and you win simple.
that is hard Q.Q
RE: Vet talk: Unwritten 'rules' on pvp engagements |RANT - Traxit - 04-30-2016
(04-30-2016, 03:42 PM)Auzari Wrote: can you at least put some kind of constructive sentence and header to explain what the hell you're on about?
legitimately.
the way you formated your *long* post makes me want to flip you off and ignore your thread. it's really tiring to read, get to the point.
Yeh. Learn to format your crap. Can't read this scrambled white text.
RE: Vet talk: Unwritten 'rules' on pvp engagements |RANT - nOmnomnOm - 04-30-2016
(04-30-2016, 04:11 PM)Traxit Wrote:(04-30-2016, 03:42 PM)Auzari Wrote: can you at least put some kind of constructive sentence and header to explain what the hell you're on about?
legitimately.
the way you formated your *long* post makes me want to flip you off and ignore your thread. it's really tiring to read, get to the point.
Yeh. Learn to format your crap. Can't read this scrambled white text.
yeah ok ill make it with pretty colors next version
RE: Vet talk: Unwritten 'rules' on pvp engagements |RANT - Stuffz - 04-30-2016
Well except when you also started to shoot fighters that were not hugging the jumpgate. And then you brought a second gunboat.
All in all it was another nice pew that was enjoyable for both sides until the gunboat came in.
But this is not surprising because jayce has never cared about fairplay or even considered the fun of the players on the opposing side.
The biggest irony of this all is that one of the aoi fighters then promptly started to hug the jumpgate as well when your gunboat wasn't near.