+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery General (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=23)
+--- Thread: Regarding Lazy Players (/showthread.php?tid=145877)
RE: Regarding Lazy Players - Kauket - 12-01-2016
(12-01-2016, 06:18 PM)Tutashkhia Wrote: May I know the source was? Who provided you with the evidences and who cares so much about who docks and who flies around the Rochester?
People roleplaying.
On a roleplay server.
Oh dear lord.
(Rochester has a no-cap-dock policy.)
RE: Regarding Lazy Players - Stoner_Steve - 12-01-2016
(12-01-2016, 06:18 PM)Tutashkhia Wrote: May I know the source was? Who provided you with the evidences and who cares so much about who docks and who flies around the Rochester?
I care, isn't that all that is needed?
RE: Regarding Lazy Players - Tutashkhia - 12-01-2016
I was just curious who inRP cares so much about the Rochester's welfare.
Another question, does any Junker Base Laws or Regulations say that an OC ID/IFF Kusari Explorer can't use Rochester base?
RE: Regarding Lazy Players - Stoner_Steve - 12-01-2016
(12-01-2016, 06:31 PM)Tutashkhia Wrote: I was just curious who inRP cares so much about the Rochester's welfare.
Another question, does any Junker Base Laws or Regulations say that an OC ID/IFF Kusari Explorer can't use Rochester base?
Your getting off topic, go make your own thread, this is about creating a solution to the problem of players using Rochester Base to stage attacks from
E: unlawful Players
RE: Regarding Lazy Players - Hannibal - 12-01-2016
(12-01-2016, 06:26 PM)Captain_Nemo Wrote: I care, isn't that all that is needed?
i would prefer a inrp comms with evidence from present lawful ship(s) or your faction ship(s) being present while this happened for a FR5
(12-01-2016, 06:32 PM)Captain_Nemo Wrote: Your getting off topic, go make your own thread, this is about creating a solution to the problem of players using Rochester Base to stage attacks from
E: unlawful Players
while we could replace rochester with a pob that can limit the ships which can dock(by class and id) will just create some additional problems : ships won't be able to be bought on it, no access to connecticout and.. will just make no sense for junkers to restrict that while there's no lawful nearby
so.. status quo might actually be better then the alternatives..
RE: Regarding Lazy Players - Officially_that_Guy - 12-01-2016
(12-01-2016, 06:31 PM)Tutashkhia Wrote: I was just curious who inRP cares so much about the Rochester's welfare.
Every. Single. Junker. Do you have any idea how much comms flak I have taken because of pirates using rochester? Actually, I have taken actual flak for that, too. Because somebody decided it was smart to shoot the Junker next to Roch because a pirate docked nearby. Justification "You are obviously harboring a criminal! 3milfinerdai!!!".
I was sitting next to rochester telling some other pirate to clear out since he was being followed by a police ship within 6k - he docked anyway. Thats some BS I tell you - its lore violation, really.
But that one-way JH idea sounds really nice. Its like the NY JH in NY, coming out near Buffalo.
RE: Regarding Lazy Players - TickTack - 12-01-2016
(12-01-2016, 06:45 PM)Hannibal Wrote: i would prefer a inrp comms with evidence from present lawful ship(s) or your faction ship(s) being present while this happened for a FR5
The evidence was gathered by Aux, I know because I seen the Aux ship there when we were all undocking, honestly this wasn't a problem at all till Aux decided to stir up the waters again. The last time something like this happened was when the unlawfulls kept running to and hugging Rochester when being shot at by the [LN] when Hale was still in charge.
Why try and kill off the player base that actually keeps things interesting in NY by denying them docking at convenient locations, and as it stands junkers don't really care about Rochester base except in the "RP sense" so why not make some event out of it where the rogues take over Rochester or something, or better yet give the junkers a new base around 2e right and let unlawful have Rochester.
RE: Regarding Lazy Players - Tutashkhia - 12-01-2016
@Officially_that_Guy It doesn't really seem like you or any other member from Junkers faction care too much about it. If you cared, you would witness everything yourself. Have you seen me docking on Rochester when I was chased by lawfuls? Or have you seen me initiating a battle against lawfuls right next to Rochester?
It is funny talking about "Every. Single. Junker. Cares", when you are judging things depending on the evidences provided by some unknown factions(players), or whatever/whoever they were.
P.S That Jump Hole idea sounds interesting.
RE: Regarding Lazy Players - Stoner_Steve - 12-01-2016
(12-01-2016, 06:45 PM)Hannibal Wrote: so.. status quo might actually be better then the alternatives..
That statement quite literally disgust me. You are a terrible admin for suggesting that having oorp threats against PoB stations over another PoB attack should be the "status quo"
RE: Regarding Lazy Players - Stoner_Steve - 12-01-2016
Look, all I am saying is there is a way to fix this, in my mind, in such a way that will prevent players from throwing a fit for getting caught
Either
1. Allow LPI to have no-dock commands on Rochester
2. Add another Rogue base in the Northern Scrap Field (maybe Western)
3. Add a one way JH from Buffalo to the northern area
4. Give Rochester to the unlawfuls (which would probably result in its inRP destruction)
I'm seriously open to anything