+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Discovery Mod General Discussion (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=37)
+--- Thread: Should certain debris fields be shrunk? (/showthread.php?tid=24385)
Pages:
1
2
Should certain debris fields be shrunk? - Donutman - 08-06-2009
Theres the RP with the pitts field that seems to have died out.....
Should certain debris fields be shrunk? - kindred - 08-06-2009
Due to all the exploding LNS ships the Pittsburgh debri field should actually be growing bigger.
Should certain debris fields be shrunk? - Weedalot - 08-06-2009
' Wrote:Due to all the exploding LNS ships the Pittsburgh debri field should actually be growing bigger.yea i believe aurora left there couple of nice fields. Maybe a small part of that field should be named after that ship
Should certain debris fields be shrunk? - Thexare - 08-06-2009
I don't know about shrunk, but a few noticeable empty pockets would make sense. Certain areas would probably have more interesting/useful wreckage than others, or maybe clearing certain areas wouldn't hinder the cover around a base and would still contribute to keeping up the appearances...
As an added benefit, if NPC patrols are also removed from such a pocket, it can make a good RPing spot or sparring ground - I found a spot in Sigma-13 kinda like that, though there are occasional Corsairs and it's in the cloud rather than the debris, but you get the idea.
Should certain debris fields be shrunk? - reavengitair - 08-06-2009
Certainly, I'm sure some of them would be either shrunk or gone by now.
Others... well... they will always be around.
Should certain debris fields be shrunk? - AJBeast - 08-06-2009
I always thought that the shrinking was obvious. Why would ALG be there if the field always remained the same size anyways .