+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery General (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=23)
+--- Thread: Slave liner rename. (/showthread.php?tid=62102)
Pages:
1
2
Slave liner rename. - jammi - 06-25-2011
' Wrote:Agreed. This ship needs less restriction.I don't see why. It's supposed to be rare, and is currently rarer than the Jinkitsu. Just how many 800 year old transports do you think would be left intact, after all that time free-floating, unrepaired and uncared for? As a matter of a fact, how many do you think would even be found again by chance (out of the minority that can be used)? Once something drifts away from a station or planet and it's not emitting any output, unless you specifically know where to look, it's gone for good.
Spazzy: Point is, you're trying to get its name as 'Slaver' knocked off, when that is its primary role. People just happen to use it for other stuff. If you want to change its primary role, then fair enough.
Slave liner rename. - Hexx - 06-25-2011
Well, I use it on a slaver, and I can say it's not an amazingly impressive ship. Smuggler types don't have a wide variety of choices, so I don't think that a ship that is basically just a refitted wreck should have such an incriminating name on it, and restricted accordingly.
Though Slavers did refit these wrecks, it's pretty silly to say that only the slavers found the ships if they were abandoned wrecks. Junkers would have also, and Junker ships do not carry the "Slaver" title.