![]() |
|
Battleships - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Forum: Discovery Mod General Discussion (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=37) +--- Thread: Battleships (/showthread.php?tid=25231) |
Battleships - Altaris - 08-21-2009 ' Wrote:2nd Like I said, BS are supposed to be bad vs bombers. How much times I need to repeat that. Dude if you read topic from start, you will notice, that I am for the same thing... Battleships - Camtheman Of Freelancer4Ever - 08-21-2009 Well, You minus well give up here blaze. I doubt this topic will get anywhere. Take this for example http://discoverygc.com/forums/index.php?sh...p+Point+Defense Thats my 32 page Capital ship point defense SUCKS topic. After all that, nothing happened. Give up, Its a bomber's world. Battleships - Eppy - 08-21-2009 ' Wrote:1st If you take skilled guys, Fighter win vs Bombers and GB does too. And yet, with fighter escorts, Battleships are supposed to win out over the bombers, because the fighter escorts shoot down the bombers before they can kill the Battleship. And yet, the fighter escorts are incapable of doing so, making the bomber more useful than the fighter, which is sick and disgusting. Has that thought occurred? Battleships - Altaris - 08-21-2009 ' Wrote:Well, You minus well give up here blaze. I doubt this topic will get anywhere. Yush! I wanted VIrus or DL to write this, with Closing this topic after that. They just got ninjad. Battleships - Camtheman Of Freelancer4Ever - 08-21-2009 I agree, eppy. Battleships are fine. Its bombers that need to be nerfed. Less steering speed. BS + 2 Fighters should win over 2 or three bombers. In 90% of situations I witnessed, this is not the case. Battleships - Altaris - 08-21-2009 ' Wrote:And yet, with fighter escorts, Battleships are supposed to win out over the bombers, because the fighter escorts shoot down the bombers before they can kill the Battleship. And yet, the fighter escorts are incapable of doing so, making the bomber more useful than the fighter, which is sick and disgusting. Has that thought occurred? You are part of Devy team are you not? http://discoverygc.com/forums/index.php?sh...43038&st=80 Battleships - Eppy - 08-21-2009 ' Wrote:You are part of Devy team are you not? Just because you're part of the dev team doesn't actually mean you're allowed to do anything. Battleships - Altaris - 08-21-2009 ' Wrote:Just because you're part of the dev team doesn't actually mean you're allowed to do anything. Never said, you can. I believe you guys have some sort of chat or smthng, just like Admins, near sanctions. Any possibility, so you can recommend it to rest of Dev, and talk about it? Battleships - Eppy - 08-21-2009 ' Wrote:Never said, you can. I believe you guys have some sort of chat or smthng, just like Admins, near sanctions. Any possibility, so you can recommend it to rest of Dev, and talk about it? I would love to explain the organizational structure of the dev team to you, but because of forum rules I am not allowed to do so (and rightly so, IMHO). That said, No. Battleships - Altaris - 08-21-2009 Suggesting, to close this topic, for this will be probably also No'd by devs. If they increase speed of BS turrets for BS to become more powerful, which will cause great amount of cap spamm, instead of increasing projectile speed for small crafts... Would be stupid and unwise. |