+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Rules & Requests (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Forum: Rules (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=25)
+--- Thread: Indies VS. Capships. (/showthread.php?tid=9286)
Indies VS. Capships. - Akumabito - 06-12-2008
' Wrote:Look closer.
Still not seeing anything anything above the drivel level.
Indies VS. Capships. - Akumabito - 06-12-2008
' Wrote:That means compromise with other players.
Exactly my point. A good compromise is for factions to require players that act oorp, whether in cap ships or not, to register, instead of making every indie their target.
The fact remains that only a very few players are a problem, some are in factions (like the =cr= that F1 that's in the sanctions thread and the AFA that reengaged with the knowledge of a faction leader in my last big melee) and some or not (like a bretonia cruiser with a civi ID trying to pirate a gateway).
but the faction leaders don't respect indies enough not to target all indies instead of the oorp ones.
And respect is a two way street.
Indies VS. Capships. - Jihadjoe - 06-12-2008
' Wrote:Exactly my point. A good compromise is for factions to require players that act oorp. whether in cap ships or not, to register, instead of making every indie their target.
I am saying you are not compromising with very well established roleplay from a large group, holding you own roleplay in higher esteem than theirs. This is behaviour I regard as arrogant.
Dont' twist my words, its not regarded as an honourable way to conduct a debate as it avoids you having to look at your own standpoint with a critical eye, and simply lowers any debate to people simply trying to find loopholes in the other pesons arguement or picking up on secific wording and semantics.
Indies VS. Capships. - Akumabito - 06-12-2008
' Wrote:I am saying you are not compromising with very well established roleplay from a large group, holding you own roleplay in higher esteem than theirs.
If that's what your saying you are not being truthful.
Registering a destroyer on the forums is a zero rp event. If the faction leaders cared about RP they would target RP rather than just see which dogs will jump through a hoop for them if they threaten pvp whoring.
And don't accuse me of twisting your words when you are far more about insults than debate. If one of you would actually debate it would be a miracle.
Indies VS. Capships. - timmychen - 06-12-2008
I demand one of Dusty's recipes.
Indies VS. Capships. - Dusty Lens - 06-12-2008
Xoria would kick my butt if I started dropping soup recipes now.
Indies VS. Capships. - onca - 06-12-2008
Onca has spoken.
![[Image: arguint-1.jpg]](http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t308/onca747/arguint-1.jpg)
Indies VS. Capships. - Akumabito - 06-12-2008
You do know the term "retarded" is rather discriminatory, right?
I have friends with a downs syndrome son, he's a great guy. I feel personally insulted by your posting.
' Wrote:Onca has spoken.
Indies VS. Capships. - onca - 06-12-2008
*taps the sign*
Indies VS. Capships. - McNeo - 06-12-2008
Aku, the time to stop posting came long ago.
Personally, I feel the same way as you do about the aging debate on Corsairs in Sharks with Debs, but we dont push the point as much as you. Why?
Because we've already lost.
You lost quite a while ago. Choose the next time carefully as to when to pick at old wounds. Now simply isnt the time, as all you're doing is pissing everyone off.
The battle never ends, but the more you relentlessly attack the status quo, the worse it gets.
I speak from experience in that respect.
There is as much tactics in an arguement as there is in a physical battle. Its up to you to see how to get the most out of the quickly dwindling resources that you possess.
If you feel the need to take the mickey out of this post, then you have killed your own point.