![]() |
about battleship spawming.. - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Discovery General (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=23) +--- Thread: about battleship spawming.. (/showthread.php?tid=4350) |
about battleship spawming.. - X-Lancer - 10-27-2007 drop down battleship's ability is not a good way to prevent battleship spawming and whoring..my idea is we should make a rules that is controls how many battleship allow to fight in a battle. about battleship spawming.. - Ascendancy - 10-27-2007 Meh...if someone wants to bring a bunch of capital ships with no fighter support, let them. And if they all get killed by very heavy fighters/bombers, then oops, that's your fault for bringing nothing to stop the fighters. about battleship spawming.. - Jinx - 10-27-2007 i hear a lot about it - but is the battleship whoring really that bad? - mostly i see the smaller ships - destroyers, cruisers, gunboats. but i rarely really see many battleships engage. about battleship spawming.. - X-Lancer - 10-27-2007 in my opinion, Battleship should handle alot of fighter.. ' Wrote:i hear a lot about it - but is the battleship whoring really that bad? - mostly i see the smaller ships - destroyers, cruisers, gunboats. but i rarely really see many battleships engage. because gunboats and cruisers are way more batter than battleship......and in a battleship shooting fighters and bombers are so painful..... about battleship spawming.. - Malaclypse 666 - 10-27-2007 ' Wrote:in my opinion, Battleship should handle alot of fighter.. Well, it's a free world.. and everyone's entitled to an opinion.. Just one question. What earthly good is opening this discussion again? Hmm? about battleship spawming.. - X-Lancer - 10-27-2007 i think u nerver see a battleship kill by 3 fighters.. about battleship spawming.. - Jwnantze - 10-27-2007 2 fighters and a bomber almost took out the Warhammer once....he got out of the roid field and cruised.... about battleship spawming.. - Epholl - 10-27-2007 3 bombers once almost took Warhammer down although 4VHFs were defending him... 2VHFs vs 2VHFs usually means a 30+ min fight... With a BS unable to avoid shots on it, and unhittable small bombers with a lot of B/Bs in 90% its no matter what defends the BS.... about battleship spawming.. - Panzer - 10-27-2007 Yes... battleships should be a checkmate move. They aren't. Their numbers will be restricted greatly - the introduction of a BS license is imo an excellent idea. 3 BSs per faction, no freelancin' juggernauts and we're all good. If only those ships still in service could really make a difference... not being swarmed by a few bombers. about battleship spawming.. - GlyphStorm - 10-28-2007 I think that 1 BS per player rule should do many things... I have just 1 Battleship, and I don't intend to build more. If I want to use another BS type, I will go freelancing (switch factions), not build a new ship... And it's quite unfair for a Freelancer to be restricted to have a capital ship of his own... it ruins all the fun... It's Freelancer after all:) Glyph |