Suggestion to the Shared account Rule.

[Laowai]

It's pretty black and white really everyone:

If you willingly share an account, you do so at your own risk. We will not be getting involved.

---

http://img686.imageshack.us/img686/3289/...047770.png

[Athenian]

As opposed to SP, with Ioncross FL Character Editor?

Real life opponents can be way harder than anything the computer can throw at you.

---

Former member of "the most paranoid group of people in the community"
Discovery Community Forum Rules

[FraserTE]

I don't see why the Adminstrators have to get involved at all in this. Your deals with players and whether or not you can trust or distrust someone is hardly something anyone else should have hand, act or part in. You take your chances.

Ya but i tend to get banned when they go and ban weed for no reasion at all with no proof before they post a sanction report and the unban because they eather could not come to a decision .

/rant

---

http://signavatar.com/15890_s.gif
First: You've got a picture in there that's 800x286 pixels. The maximum signature size is 700x250.
Second: Your other picture in the rotation fills the full 700x250 boundaries by itself.
With an image that big, you can't fit any text below it. Please fix this.
-Zuke

A sane man must become insane to look sane
In an insane world.

[Koolmo]

English please while ranting there, slappity.

Generally, the only shared accounts I have access to are ones that hold a battleship, cruiser, or bank, and those accounts are given only to people that I trust, and that the other people who hold the account trust. If you don't trust someone, don't give them the damn keys, simple as that.

---

<span style="color:#FFFF00">&quot;General Solo, is your strike team assembled?&quot;
&quot;Barely, they're pretty drunk.&quot; </span>
SCRA Recruiting--SCRA Feedback--SCRA Message Dump--SCRA Faction Status

I can picture in my mind a world without war, a world without hate. And I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it.

[farmerman]

On that note, as a suggestion for possible /movechar issues, having an option to disable using it with a command would be one way to make things a bit better.

---

Faction info links: Samura Heavy Industries : LWB : Watchers

[Weedalot]

On that note, as a suggestion for possible /movechar issues, having an option to disable using it with a command would be one way to make things a bit better.

Well that wont work, If one disable it the other can enable it, or if you disable it with a code than the one who disabled it can enable it at will or something like that.. i hope you see the point. if an admin disable it.. think how much more work disabling shared accounts movechar commands it will take.

---

♠ Because we can ♠

[farmerman]

Well that wont work, If one disable it the other can enable it, or if you disable it with a code than the one who disabled it can enable it at will or something like that.. i hope you see the point. if an admin disable it.. think how much more work disabling shared accounts movechar commands it will take.

Actually, I was thinking that once the command was issued, it wouldn't be changeable after.

---

Faction info links: Samura Heavy Industries : LWB : Watchers