• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 376 377 378 379 380 … 547 Next »
Should certain debris fields be shrunk?

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (2): « Previous 1 2
Should certain debris fields be shrunk?
Offline Donutman
08-06-2009, 05:49 AM,
#11
Member
Posts: 835
Threads: 21
Joined: Jun 2008

Theres the RP with the pitts field that seems to have died out.....

' Wrote:This thread is so stupid that a bird sitting on a nearby tree just EXPLODED.
  Reply  
Offline kindred
08-06-2009, 05:51 AM,
#12
Member
Posts: 1,699
Threads: 9
Joined: Sep 2007

Due to all the exploding LNS ships the Pittsburgh debri field should actually be growing bigger.




Devtonia ; all-or-nothing approach to bias.
Reply  
Offline Weedalot
08-06-2009, 05:53 AM,
#13
Member
Posts: 2,364
Threads: 38
Joined: Oct 2008

' Wrote:Due to all the exploding LNS ships the Pittsburgh debri field should actually be growing bigger.
yea i believe aurora left there couple of nice fields. Maybe a small part of that field should be named after that ship

♠ Because we can ♠
  Reply  
Offline Thexare
08-06-2009, 09:14 AM, (This post was last modified: 08-06-2009, 09:14 AM by Thexare.)
#14
Ominously Humming
Posts: 3,821
Threads: 340
Joined: Apr 2008

I don't know about shrunk, but a few noticeable empty pockets would make sense. Certain areas would probably have more interesting/useful wreckage than others, or maybe clearing certain areas wouldn't hinder the cover around a base and would still contribute to keeping up the appearances...

As an added benefit, if NPC patrols are also removed from such a pocket, it can make a good RPing spot or sparring ground - I found a spot in Sigma-13 kinda like that, though there are occasional Corsairs and it's in the cloud rather than the debris, but you get the idea.
Reply  
Offline reavengitair
08-06-2009, 11:28 AM,
#15
Member
Posts: 3,399
Threads: 108
Joined: Dec 2008

Certainly, I'm sure some of them would be either shrunk or gone by now.

Others... well... they will always be around.
  Reply  
Offline AJBeast
08-06-2009, 11:51 AM,
#16
Member
Posts: 1,477
Threads: 55
Joined: Aug 2008

I always thought that the shrinking was obvious. Why would ALG be there if the field always remained the same size anyways .
Reply  
Pages (2): « Previous 1 2


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode