Note on The Order policies

[Tenacity]

Are you blind? Read what Eppy wrote to me sir ... I'm concerned you found nothing wrong with his flame toward me. Is it a personal bias against me or did you just miss his comments?

never said i found nothing wrong with his flame, neither one of them belong in the thread, but at least part of his post is on topic.

---

[Baltar]

never said i found nothing wrong with his flame, neither one of them belong in the thread, but at least part of his post is on topic.

Aren't you the presumptuous one? Explain to me WHY we have no business here? I have an Order character ... so it does apply to me.

Now ... if you have objection to Eppy's flames as well ... WHY (please do tell) did you ONLY address me?

[Tenacity]

Aren't you the presumptuous one? Explain to me WHY we have no business here? I have an Order character ... so it does apply to me.

Now ... if you have objection to Eppy's flames as well ... WHY (please do tell) did you ONLY address me?

Your entire reply was addressing his flames, and returning with some of your own. The last half of his post was on topic, none of yours was.

Now, enough, if you arent going to contribute to the topic at hand, please stop posting.

---

[Baltar]

Your entire reply was addressing his flames, and returning with some of your own. The last half of his post was on topic, none of yours was.

Now, enough, if you arent going to contribute to the topic at hand, please stop posting.

Explain to me how THIS response by you is on topic? My comments were on topic ... Eppy responded to MY post with his flames ... I responded to him ... you responded to me ... now we're in an endless loop.

So ... you gonna address Eppy? Or are we gonna go on forever? Can't just pick on one person when two were involved.

[n00bl3t]

@ Baltar: It is quite simple, post something related to the topic, then flame Eppy.

This is an RP server.

Regardless, fairness exists and is an ideal of this community.

---

Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.