• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Role-Playing Communication Channel
« Previous 1 … 2157 2158 2159 2160 2161 … 2173 Next »
Order-GMG Treaty Proposal

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll: Do you support this treaty and it's terms?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes
60.00%
21 60.00%
No
40.00%
14 40.00%
Total 35 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3
Order-GMG Treaty Proposal
Offline Heartless
03-20-2009, 02:13 AM,
#21
Member
Posts: 1,529
Threads: 107
Joined: Nov 2007

Personally, I am against this idea. Why do we all of a sudden need the GMG? We've made it fine for many many years without them, and just because you want a treaty with someone in Kusari that doesn't mean we need to have one. We keep a low profile, we're small, and we don't need this monopolizing company to influence out faction.

As for the statements in the treaty draft.

No GMG ship will -ever- enter Omicron 100. There is no reason to, and I will have them treated as any other imposter to Omicron 100.

There is absolutely no need for Order vessels to leave the Omicrons and make a trail all the way to GMG influenced space. We have no business there and we don't need to start any.

And as for weapons and ships, again, the Order shouldn't be using GMG eqquipment and vice versa. If I see a GMG vessel with any Order eqquipment I won't be happy and I'll have that vessel detained until I get an explanation and the weapons or whatever it is are gone.

I hope you understand why I feel this is a bad idea. There's no point to it, and it's a threat to our very existance. We can't afford to get involved in this game when we're facing a war on three fronts.

I voted no.

[Image: Cg7QQEd.png]
[Image: 14jn684.jpg]
SwissScorch --> Heartless
Reply  
Offline Enrico_B
03-20-2009, 02:23 AM, (This post was last modified: 03-20-2009, 12:19 PM by Enrico_B.)
#22
Member
Posts: 186
Threads: 16
Joined: Aug 2007

Edit disregard my comment
  Reply  
Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode