• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Rules & Requests Rules
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 … 198 Next »
Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (9): « Previous 1 … 5 6 7 8 9
Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5
Offline Grumblesaur
12-14-2018, 05:41 AM,
#81
Fleet Tender
Posts: 2,742
Threads: 56
Joined: Sep 2008

TL;DR: +1 for Kazinsal's idea

Honestly, striking the whole rule probably wouldn't have a noticeable effect on game balance. One guy flying two transports is half as able to defend his convoy from piracy. One guy flying two miners is only drawing the eyes of more people to the system he's in. Even if someone can abuse their abundance of functioning hardware to make more money in-game, they will eventually run out of things they want or need to buy.

Sure, that's twice as many lolwut battleships such a player can fund, but if we can surmise it's slightly difficult to fly two transports at once, just imagine how big of a pain in the butt it would be to drag two capital ships around. I doubt everyone'd be hooking up a second tower and monitor to their battlestation to multibox in an abusive way.

Besides all that though, striking the selected clause is a good idea. Permitting players from the same IP to participate in playing Discovery would be a positive thing. I have some friends I'd like to show the game to, but I'd much prefer to start out with a LAN party to get everyone set up. Herding cats is slightly easier when you can see them in person. In addition, it might be good to prescribe or suggest that:
  • Players discovered to be abusing this leniency will suffer some kind of punishment, such as a loadout or bank account adjustment.
  • Players sharing an IP address not also share a forum account (with exceptions for faction management accounts or roleplay alts).

There's opportunity for players to take advantage, yes, since without a well-defined (if ill-conceived) rule such as a mandated one-to-one IP-to-player ratio, it's extremely difficult to prove abuse, but I also suspect that abusing the system might be too much work for your average player to consider investing in a game.

A way a lone a last a loved a long the riverrun, past Eve and Adam's, from swerve of shore to bend of bay,
brings us by a commodius vicus of recirculation back to Howth Castle and Environs.
Reply  
Offline teschy
05-22-2019, 09:32 AM,
#82
20yrs & I Only Got This Title
Posts: 2,471
Threads: 24
Joined: Jan 2007

This is still relevant and needs to be addressed by the current administration. A lot of people trade and mine for fun, let households have their fun too.
Reply  
Pages (9): « Previous 1 … 5 6 7 8 9


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode