• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community The Community Real Life Discussion
« Previous 1 … 115 116 117 118 119 … 245 Next »
EA The worst company in the US

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard
Kusari Super Alloy Shipments - 555,650 / 2,000,000
LSF Arms Shipments - 84,950 / 2,000,000
LSF Munition Shipments - 67,131 / 2,000,000
Pirate Black Market Shipments - 314,700 / 1,000,000
Dragon Bounties - 8 / 10,000
KOI Bounties - 15 / 10,000
LSF Bounties - 14 / 10,000
Samura Bounties - 4 / 10,000

Latest activity

Pages (2): « Previous 1 2
EA The worst company in the US
Offline r3vange
04-05-2012, 09:03 PM, (This post was last modified: 04-05-2012, 09:05 PM by r3vange.)
#11
Member
Posts: 2,302
Threads: 113
Joined: May 2010

[color=#FFFFFF]... for free, and craftfully pointing out that Bethesda did charge $$$ when they changed the ending of Fallout 3...

I sort of like how they left out the fact that Bioware and EA combined can't make a DLC that can hold a candle to Bethesda's

[Image: r3vange.gif]
Reply  
Offline Loken
04-05-2012, 09:13 PM,
#12
Phantom of Roussillon
Posts: 2,202
Threads: 80
Joined: Jun 2010

They changed the ending because although it was good, people were disappointed that it 'ended' the game. Broken Steel or whatever it was called was all new content. There have been plenty of games where this isn't the case and Microsoft seems to be worse for it than EA from what I've seen. Relic admitted that Microsoft had forced then to remove content from Dawn of War II to be sold as DLC on the live marketplace for example.

[Image: NVY3f0y.png]
Reply  
Offline r3vange
04-05-2012, 09:16 PM,
#13
Member
Posts: 2,302
Threads: 113
Joined: May 2010

[color=#FFFFFF]Not what I meant, EA is the company that will literally charge you 10 bucks for a skin and now they are showing off about releasing a free DLC and point out the competition so they can look better

[Image: r3vange.gif]
Reply  
Offline the real dutch
04-05-2012, 10:18 PM,
#14
Member
Posts: 273
Threads: 12
Joined: Feb 2007

i vote ubisoft cause of their DRM crap
my mom ever bought settlers 7 and never been able to play it
even with 24/7 internet.

[Image: minerpc.jpg]
  Reply  
Offline Loken
04-05-2012, 10:25 PM,
#15
Phantom of Roussillon
Posts: 2,202
Threads: 80
Joined: Jun 2010

' Wrote:[color=#FFFFFF]Not what I meant, EA is the company that will literally charge you 10 bucks for a skin and now they are showing off about releasing a free DLC and point out the competition so they can look better
Its low, especially since they are by no means the first to release free DLC.

[Image: NVY3f0y.png]
Reply  
Pages (2): « Previous 1 2


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode