• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 216 217 218 219 220 … 547 Next »
Lore Discussion in regards to the Hogosha

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3 Next »
Lore Discussion in regards to the Hogosha
Offline Zelot
01-18-2012, 08:18 PM,
#11
Member
Posts: 7,539
Threads: 379
Joined: Jun 2007

' Wrote:Because the Kusari government could be said to now care about what happens to Kishiro Technologies substantial investments in Okinawa.

The prospect of continued Hogosha attacks on GMG/Kishiro installations depends entirely on how far the Hogosha would be willing to push Kishiro, and how much Kishiro would use their influence in government to act against the Hogosha.

In terms of the lore concerning Samura/GMG hostility - that was always covert. Neither side publicly blamed the other - it was all very polite, as is the Kusari way. GMG's 'bad situation' was being placed under an onerous tax burden by Kusari, as well as the whittling down of KSP patrols on the Honshu border.

Besides - the lore indicates that a most of the Hogosha who infiltrated the government are now in jail. So unless they are planning on running the organisation from their cells - we can expect to see fresh leadership, and possibly a fresh approach.

Do you consider the GMG and Kishiro to be one and the same? Because it certainly seems so.

[Image: 13121_s.gif]  
Reply  
Offline Dab
01-18-2012, 08:20 PM,
#12
Member
Posts: 9,570
Threads: 320
Joined: Aug 2005

' Wrote:Right?


Edit: The real issue here is not with Kishiro, although Dab couched the question that way. The real issue is with the GMG, who will hate the Hogosha no matter what, doesnt matter if they try to cuddle up to them or not. The Hogosha dont really attack Kishiro all that much, generally that is more a thing for the FA. The GMG, who own Okinawa? That is a different question, and probably the more important one.
Actually, the real issue is Kishiro, and GMG has absolutely nothing to do with this, and will continue to have nothing to do with these changes, regardless how much you attempt to bring them into it. I'm trying to make Hogosha's roleplay and lore conform to what the players think it should be, in regards to their relationship with Kishiro. That relationship directly affects their operations in Okinawa. If Hogosha aren't interested in remaining openly hostile to Kishiro, than they should not be openly attacking Isehara. As such, the lore in Oki might need adjusting.

Also Zelot, Hogosha do attack Kishiro in Okinawa. Hence this entire topic. By what you said, you seem to agree with me in that the Hogosha continuing to be openly hostile against Kishiro in Okinawa would be contrary to their new lore.



In regards to Slart's post I'd like to clarify that, though I said I could see Hogosha buddying up to Kishiro, I do feel it more likely that they try to play both sides of the fence;

[1:13:50 PM] Dabbykins: But I feel it is more likely
[1:13:53 PM | Edited 1:13:57 PM] Dabbykins: They try to play both sides of the fence

As I feel they wouldn't go away from Samura completely, especially considering their new operations in Nagano.

' Wrote:If I understood you well,you want to make hogosha a smuggler faction
No, I want to know what the Hogosha players want Hogosha to be. Then I can adjust the lore to conform to that.

[Image: DFinal.png]
Reply  
Offline Friday
01-18-2012, 08:26 PM,
#13
Member
Posts: 1,897
Threads: 76
Joined: Aug 2007

' Wrote:Edit: The real issue here is not with Kishiro, although Dab couched the question that way. The real issue is with the GMG, who will hate the Hogosha no matter what, doesnt matter if they try to cuddle up to them or not. The Hogosha dont really attack Kishiro all that much, generally that is more a thing for the FA. The GMG, who own Okinawa? That is a different question, and probably the more important one.

The real issue goes beyond the GMG, and into foreign relations generally.

Before the change of government, the GMG would never have complained about the actions of the Hogosha - knowing that the old Kusari regime wouldnt give a toss.

Now its not just the GMG - potentially every foreign government might start complaining to the new Kusari government about Hogosha piracy in their space.

Really they shouldn't though. Its like when a Russian Mafia or Yakuza Gang gets busted in a foreign country. That country does not declare war on Russia/Japan - nor do those countries of origin have sanctions applied against them.

It is treated as a local matter. So if anything I would say the Hogosha need to spread their wings, forge some new alliances and become 'local matters' in other Houses, as well as harassing the GMG.

[Image: GMG_banner.png]

  Reply  
Offline Friday
01-18-2012, 08:28 PM,
#14
Member
Posts: 1,897
Threads: 76
Joined: Aug 2007

' Wrote:Do you consider the GMG and Kishiro to be one and the same? Because it certainly seems so.

GMG and Kishiro are allies.

[Image: GMG_banner.png]

  Reply  
Offline Zelot
01-18-2012, 08:33 PM,
#15
Member
Posts: 7,539
Threads: 379
Joined: Jun 2007

' Wrote:GMG and Kishiro are allies.

Is that a yes or a no? Really, just because two factions are allies do not mean that they are the same, or think the same, or will always agree.

[Image: 13121_s.gif]  
Reply  
Offline Dab
01-18-2012, 08:39 PM,
#16
Member
Posts: 9,570
Threads: 320
Joined: Aug 2005

' Wrote:Is that a yes or a no? Really, just because two factions are allies do not mean that they are the same, or think the same, or will always agree.
Not part of the topic.

GMG has nothing to do with it. This is about Kishiro and Hogosha. No one else, so stop trying to derail it.

[Image: DFinal.png]
Reply  
Offline Zelot
01-18-2012, 08:41 PM,
#17
Member
Posts: 7,539
Threads: 379
Joined: Jun 2007

' Wrote:Not part of the topic.

GMG has nothing to do with it. This is about Kishiro and Hogosha. No one else, so stop trying to derail it.

Well then the answer is clearly they would stop attacking Kishiro in Okinawa, everywhere really, while continuing to attack the GMG.

[Image: 13121_s.gif]  
Reply  
Offline Pinko
01-18-2012, 08:58 PM,
#18
Mr Onion
Posts: 3,189
Threads: 388
Joined: Jun 2009

' Wrote:If I understood you well,you want to make hogosha a smuggler faction

Which is what they've ALWAYS been.

I want to get off Mr. Igiss' wild ride.
Reply  
Offline casero
01-18-2012, 09:18 PM,
#19
Mine Eater
Posts: 2,101
Threads: 49
Joined: Nov 2008

I don't think anything has to be changed, any Hogosha commiting crimes (Based on the Kusari legal Codex) should be treated as a Criminal.

I don't think that the Hogosha faction should be treated as a coorporation or a police/military force.

I'd consider Hogoshas as independents from eachother, or groups, but the action of 1 hogosha shouldn't and mustn't reprensent the actions of the entire NPC faction.

If Kishiro and GMG want to be 1 faction, allies or husband and wife, shouldn't affect the way Hogosha players are treated.
Reply  
Offline Hone
01-18-2012, 09:29 PM,
#20
Banned
Posts: 4,577
Threads: 287
Joined: Jan 2010

I think Hogosha should be allowed to choose what they do, if they want to continue attacking kishiro/gmg, they should be able to, but should be punished.

That said, why would they? They were helping samura cos samura were the most powerful kiretsu, now kishiro is the most powerful, wouldnt they try to smarm up to kishiro?

User was banned for: Griefing others
Time left: (Permanent)
Reply  
Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode