• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 486 487 488 489 490 … 547 Next »
Does Discovery Mod need remade MkII versions of vanilla VHFs?

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll: Does Discovery Mod need remade MkII versions of vanilla VHFs?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes
72.73%
64 72.73%
No
27.27%
24 27.27%
Total 88 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Pages (7): 1 2 3 4 5 … 7 Next »
Does Discovery Mod need remade MkII versions of vanilla VHFs?
Offline majkp
02-23-2008, 02:24 PM, (This post was last modified: 02-23-2008, 03:02 PM by majkp.)
#1
Member
Posts: 1,437
Threads: 133
Joined: Aug 2006

I vote yes.

My explanation:
Vanilla fighters have more hit-points (or how it is called), which means they not only loose parts (such as wings with equipment), but they also get insta-killed by 1 nuke mine or sunslayer torpedo once the shield comes down. This is a great disadvantage especially in the bigger fights, as the killed fighter usually drops a lot of bot's and baterries which most probably get tractored by the fighters that don't get 'insta-killed' so they can regen a lot of times before they die.

Before you tell me I am whining because TBH keeps loosing every large battle, yes I partly do think it's our problem to a degree, because Corsairs don't have much options to use non-vanilla fighters, but I am sure that it's not the only problem. We still need to train a lot etc., I don't deny that.

OK, now what do the others think?

EDIT: This is about ADDING new versions while keeping the old ones. The statistics of MkII versions would have to be tested, discussed and balanced of course.
I am not suggesting new line of uber fighters, just pointing out the great disadvantages of the vanilla fighters...
Reply  
BULLDOGNK
02-23-2008, 02:28 PM,
#2
Unregistered
 

i totally agree with what you have to say.

its about time it had an upgrade, some may say the Outcasts also need the sabre upgraded as well,

any ship that can be instaKilled with one shot needs changing.

Cheers
Reply  
Offline Othman
02-23-2008, 02:47 PM,
#3
Member
Posts: 2,013
Threads: 49
Joined: May 2007

' Wrote:I vote yes.

My explanation:
Vanilla fighters have more hit-points (or how it is called), which means they not only loose parts (such as wings with equipment), but they also get insta-killed by 1 nuke mine or sunslayer torpedo once the shield comes down. This is a great disadvantage especially in the bigger fights, as the killed fighter usually drops a lot of bot's and baterries which most probably get tractored by the fighters that don't get 'insta-killed' so they can regen a lot of times before they die.

Before you tell me I am whining because TBH keeps loosing every large battle, yes I partly do think it's our problem to a degree, because Corsairs don't have much options to use non-vanilla fighters, but I am sure that it's not the only problem. We still need to train a lot etc., I don't deny that.

OK, now what do the others think?
Seconded, such a change has my blessing.

On the uncharted lagoons of anguish, I sail with a canoe made of my sins.
  Reply  
Offline Doom
02-23-2008, 02:53 PM,
#4
Member
Posts: 1,694
Threads: 29
Joined: Apr 2006

I voted no...big NO

VHF are extremely good as they are now. MKIIs will crash balance among ship classes.

Why Sabre should be upgraded...it is among 3 of the best fighters in game..(along with Eagle and B.Dragon)

However...i think there is a way that wireframes can be removed from original vanilla ships, but that would include making new hardpoints and insane amount of time.

And yes i understand that vanilla ships are easily destroyed by torps, mines and missiles and there are many people out there abusing that fact in fights. But there could be other ways of dealing with it.

I would increase missile, mine and torp damage output to that amount what will kill non-vanilla fighter of 9k hull in one hit. This will affect only fighters since caps proved to be rather immune to those kinds of weapons.



In TBH case, they are also fighting outcasts who happen to fly vanilla ships also.

Majk, you proposal has sense, i know how frustrating it can be when my precious Eagle gets killed by random mine or torp. But i still feel that ALL vanilla fighters should stay as they are and we should work on making wireframes for mostly used non-vanilla ships.
Reply  
Offline majkp
02-23-2008, 02:59 PM, (This post was last modified: 02-23-2008, 03:03 PM by majkp.)
#5
Member
Posts: 1,437
Threads: 133
Joined: Aug 2006

My suggestion was to keep the current ones, AND adding new MkII versions and then of course balance all their statistics.

I can imagine that the hull of Titan MkII would have to be lowered when compared to vanilla Titan etc...
Reply  
Offline skoko
02-23-2008, 03:05 PM,
#6
Member
Posts: 508
Threads: 10
Joined: Jan 2008

Voted Yes...

I am flying Guardian.. love it...but..

Totally agreed with Majkp..

see ya around..


<blockquote>Was member of : [LN] [LR] [RoS] Keepers (NovaPG) [AU]
[Image: newsiggy.gif]
[SA]-Jake.Benson - Benson's life
Alvaro Himenez of [RoS]- Alvaro's story</blockquote>
  Reply  
Offline Doom
02-23-2008, 03:06 PM,
#7
Member
Posts: 1,694
Threads: 29
Joined: Apr 2006

' Wrote:My suggestion was to keep the current ones, AND adding new MkII versions and then of course balance all their statistics.

I can imagine that the hull of Titan MkII would have to be lowered when compared to vanilla Titan etc...


ya..i understand that..thus MKII label...:)


but then who would use MKIs, what happens with vanilla HFs?...we redo them too?

On discovery development forums there are many great ideas, ideas that could work and can be done....but i just wanted to remind everybody that we have only one man who is working on new mod release and rest of us can help only that much...

adding MKIIs will create many balancing problems...

Quote:I can imagine that the hull of Titan MkII would have to be lowered when compared to vanilla Titan
Without the tests we actually don't know how much to lower it...don't we?

I want wireframe problems and instakills problem to be resolved just as much as you....i just feel that adding MKIIs isn't the way to go...that way we actually use the bug in our favor and ignore the proper way of making ships..
Reply  
Offline Dieter Schprokets
02-23-2008, 03:07 PM,
#8
Member
Posts: 4,394
Threads: 662
Joined: Jul 2007

I agree 100%

I had a sabre for a bit but got sick of getting nuked, and switched back to viper, for ONLY that reason.

Oh, and I hate mines. No mines. Ever. Just nerf them. I hate them.

Have I mentioned I hate mines?

[Image: siggy.jpg]
Reply  
Offline Etaphreven
02-23-2008, 03:09 PM, (This post was last modified: 02-23-2008, 03:09 PM by Etaphreven.)
#9
Member
Posts: 2,773
Threads: 37
Joined: Sep 2007

It's JUST happened to me -.-

EDIT: Meaning, big yes!
Reply  
Offline Jinx
02-23-2008, 03:15 PM,
#10
skipasmiður
Posts: 7,685
Threads: 313
Joined: Sep 2007

voted "no". - VHF mk1 allready have impressive firepower and are durable enough. if mk2s became less agile and gain more firepower instead, they turn into SHFs which are rather unpopular.

only if a mk2 version adds different roles to the fighter instead of simply improving them it might work.

for example:

VHF = 6 guns and around 12k shield/11k armor
VHFmk2 = 4 guns and 4 mineslots, 12k shield/11k armor

when its "just" about the vanilla weakness... can t we just replace the vanilla models with an identical custom model with a matching hitbox that does not have a destructable frame? - but then, what are missiles for.... they would be a wasted gunslot when there were no vanilla fighters out.

[Image: just_a_signature_by_sjrarj-d63yjsx.png]
Shipdesigns made for DiscoveryGC
Reply  
Pages (7): 1 2 3 4 5 … 7 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode