• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 214 215 216 217 218 … 780 Next »
Dear devs and admins:

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (14): « Previous 1 … 6 7 8 9 10 … 14 Next »
Dear devs and admins:
Offline Daedric
07-24-2012, 01:43 PM,
#71
Member
Posts: 4,321
Threads: 111
Joined: Nov 2010

He already made it very clear he isn't here to give two cents about anyone else's enjoyment and it is all about him. Why did you expect any less?

Nothing wrong with PoB, problem is with the server itself and its 1 core limit.

Helpful Discovery Guides

Get Help Here! | Player Base Guide | Mining Guide | Trading Guide
Reputation Guide | Zoner Rep Guide
[Image: 50px-OSILogo.png]
OSI Information | Join OSI! | Nichols Trade Center
OSI Bounty Board | OSI Feedback
Reply  
Offline Vladimir
07-24-2012, 02:36 PM,
#72
Member
Posts: 1,597
Threads: 39
Joined: Oct 2009

' Wrote:Isn't a discussion meant to represent the thoughts of a single person as the opening post? I cannot really speak for the whole community now can I, otherwise your reply would point that out.

You really should get some information and not base your "opinions" it on your own observations alone.

Pretty much every base siege i saw was opened with or ended up in a big battle somehow, and some - say, that very o3 - had multiple big battles around them. They're the activity hubs, create epics battles you crave for so much, and basically are not a problem but a huge help for disco not to die.

But you share your "thoughts" on how and why player bases should be removed and only at 7th page admit you only saw one battle around them. Maybe you fly in liberty too much.

[Image: 158aufs.jpg]
Reply  
Offline sindroms
07-24-2012, 02:44 PM,
#73
Member
Posts: 9,437
Threads: 985
Joined: Feb 2008

I suggest you re read that post again. Keyword is ''actual''

I will let you figure it our on yourself, you are a big boy.

--------------
PSA: If you have been having stutter/FPS lag on Disco where it does not run as smoothly as other games, please look at the fix here: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...pid2306502
----------
Reply  
Offline AeternusDoleo
07-24-2012, 03:13 PM,
#74
Ex-Developer
Posts: 5,744
Threads: 149
Joined: Nov 2009

' Wrote:There are no epic battles in the proximity of a base. There are just 10 caps shooting a stationary object. The only actual battles I have seen were the O3 ones. That one was a good and large battle.

But as for the others, it is just one side shooting a base. Nothing else.
From what I've been told - the server usually goes on it's knees when a capheavy counterattack engages the base siegers. Ergo, one of those "epic battles" you're mentioning. I've participated in a few base sieges, both on offense and defense. On the Sair side, in wasting a base in Omega 49, we had no issues whatsoever with lag until a group of Mollies decided to come and play, even though we had at least a dozen heavies shooting the base.
On the IMG side, during Falster's establishment a group of Sairs tried to dislodge us while setting up. This ended up in a clusterpew with a lot of Sairs, some Hessians, some Armed Forces and of course IMG ships - but again, the server did not seem to have a lot of issues.

It would be a good idea to note which fleets cause lag. IE which types of ships are involved in the heavy lag generating events. This can then be used to identify the specific ships that have a tendency to create high lag. I got a fair idea which ones are the most problematic (the Legate and the Zoner jug topping the list) but it would help to note which are the worst.

Wide awake in a world that sleeps, enduring thoughts, enduring scenes. The knowledge of what is yet to come.
From a time when all seems lost, from a dead man to a world, without restraint, unafraid and free.


Mostly retired Discovery member. May still visit from time to time.
Reply  
Offline Ipuvaepe
07-24-2012, 04:19 PM,
#75
Member
Posts: 984
Threads: 23
Joined: Aug 2010

' Wrote:The issue is not playerbases, but the HUGE excess of capital ships in the game. If we're going to snip something, let's start there:
- All pirate factions restricted to cruisers and below. Poorly supplied pirate factions not even a cruiser.
- All house corporate factions, civvy stuff only.
- All unaffiliated factions (Zoner, BHG, IMG, GMG and other non-house lawful factions) limited to cruiser and below.
Just stop, we both know a ships size has nothing to do with this. Instead, let's reduce the shots per second battleships can put out (without reducing damage). Slow down heavy mortars to 15% muzzle velocity to make them nearly useless in combat, reduce energy use to 1 million per shot, reduce fire rate to 10 second intervals, and multiply damage by 2.5x. The end result is a weapon useless in normal combat that does slightly better damage than a cerb (52kdps vs 45kdps) while taking slightly less energy (100k vs 110k - heavy BS can permafire 3).

EDIT: This goes from 3 projectiles per ship per second to 0.3, I'd say that would help quite a bit wouldn't you?

<span style="color:#ffbf00">*** Click to join Sigma Space General Chat on Skype! ***
Click to join the Discovery Teamspeak 3 Server!</span>
[Image: zonerzonerzoner.gif]
Old Avatars: 1 2 3 4 5 6 - Old Signatures: 1 2 3 4 5
THIS IS THE CORRECT TECH CHART
' Wrote:Also ignore Snak3. Forever.
  Reply  
Offline Ursus
07-24-2012, 04:22 PM,
#76
Member
Posts: 3,853
Threads: 249
Joined: Oct 2011

' Wrote:It would be a good idea to note which fleets cause lag. IE which types of ships are involved in the heavy lag generating events. This can then be used to identify the specific ships that have a tendency to create high lag. I got a fair idea which ones are the most problematic (the Legate and the Zoner jug topping the list) but it would help to note which are the worst.
what kind of reporting tools are available? can you automate so load > N causes shiplist to get dumped, for example

Discovery 24/7 Negotiating Tactics:

[Image: smuggler-threat-0-1.jpg]
Reply  
Offline Daedric
07-24-2012, 06:58 PM,
#77
Member
Posts: 4,321
Threads: 111
Joined: Nov 2010

When you in a battle that has horrid lag, take a mental note of what cap ships are in the area. Create a thread (or AD needs to make one, it was his idea) and post them there.

Helpful Discovery Guides

Get Help Here! | Player Base Guide | Mining Guide | Trading Guide
Reputation Guide | Zoner Rep Guide
[Image: 50px-OSILogo.png]
OSI Information | Join OSI! | Nichols Trade Center
OSI Bounty Board | OSI Feedback
Reply  
Offline Madvillain
07-24-2012, 09:36 PM,
#78
El Presidente
Posts: 2,690
Threads: 195
Joined: Apr 2010

' Wrote:It would be a good idea to note which fleets cause lag. IE which types of ships are involved in the heavy lag generating events. This can then be used to identify the specific ships that have a tendency to create high lag. I got a fair idea which ones are the most problematic (the Legate and the Zoner jug topping the list) but it would help to note which are the worst.

Corsair and Hessian battleships create a lot of lag.
Especially when jumping is involved.

[Image: zElBwT7.png]
Baila Morena | Toilet Trouble | Elder Presidente[TBH] | The Titan Combat Manual | Confession
♰ Join the Corsair Brotherhood ♰
Reply  
Offline AeternusDoleo
07-25-2012, 06:44 AM,
#79
Ex-Developer
Posts: 5,744
Threads: 149
Joined: Nov 2009

' Wrote:what kind of reporting tools are available? can you automate so load > N causes shiplist to get dumped, for example
On the FLServer process? None. The only way I know of to figure out what's creating the load is process profiling, which I don't have the skills for.

Wide awake in a world that sleeps, enduring thoughts, enduring scenes. The knowledge of what is yet to come.
From a time when all seems lost, from a dead man to a world, without restraint, unafraid and free.


Mostly retired Discovery member. May still visit from time to time.
Reply  
Offline Ursus
07-25-2012, 07:13 AM,
#80
Member
Posts: 3,853
Threads: 249
Joined: Oct 2011

what about external tools? something is grabbing the list of online players. maybe a shareware prog to monitor the process and have it dump the ships when load is high. you'd want to cross-ref ship loadout asap to eliminate changes.

I dunno, seems like we dont know which resource is being starved. I think its the weapons trajectory math that's killing it but who knows.

That could also be tested with a test server and a bunch of logins, have them all fire and monitor the process load

Discovery 24/7 Negotiating Tactics:

[Image: smuggler-threat-0-1.jpg]
Reply  
Pages (14): « Previous 1 … 6 7 8 9 10 … 14 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode