• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 141 142 143 144 145 779 Next »
are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP?

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll: Are spyglass and battleship scanners oorp on fighters, freighters and small transports?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
yes
56.67%
34 56.67%
no
43.33%
26 43.33%
Total 60 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Pages (6): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP?
Offline lIceColon
01-12-2014, 12:59 PM,
#21
Member
Posts: 878
Threads: 89
Joined: Feb 2013

obviously - why have spyglass if you could just have easily obtainable bs scanners? unless you buff spyglass to like 25k range with 20k cargo scan, otherwise there would be no purpose to having spyglass. ppl use spyglass precisely because it isn't limited to battleships, don't try to take that away pls.
  Reply  
Offline Omicron
01-12-2014, 01:17 PM,
#22
The Order
Posts: 4,745
Threads: 386
Joined: Nov 2009

TL;DR story of the Spyglass scanner

Disco-lore wise, at beggining it is tied with Nomad war.

Liberty forces were producing two experimental battleships with two entirely different approach: one was supposed to be light, small, sneaky - it became the Osiris that The Order stole. Second called "Ragnarok" if I remember right went into opposite direction: huge brick to facilitate the most sophisticated scanner available to mankind at the momenth. Funny it got stolen to.

LNS Ragnarok was aquired by Hellfire Legion who rebranded it as Spyglass class battleships. Important bit: it was neccesity for entire battleship to be built AROUND the scanner itself.

Skipping forward, Black Squadron and Hellfire Legion broke a deal. In exchange for one Osiris hull (HFBS Incursus), HF would grant The Order all blueprints and data about the Spyglass scanner array. With technological advancment of the guys in the black uniforms, it was made possible to shrink it.

The effect is that The Order required to construct just the cruiser sized hull to be built around the scanner. Soon as the plans were made, new class of recon ship was pushed into mass production (well, not the "house spam" grade of course) under name of a Resheph. On another note there is also experimental cruiser in LSF guard system that is Liberty's doing the same.

Conclusion, the only factions capable to utilize the scanner (and on specific ships only INRP) are The Order (Resheph), LN/LSF ("experimental cruiser"), Hellfire Legion (Spyglass/Arbiter) and Lane Hackers (who cannot field Spyglasses to my knowledge anymore).

[Image: E9d8RnV.jpg?1]
Reply  
Offline ProwlerPC
01-12-2014, 08:03 PM, (This post was last modified: 01-12-2014, 08:04 PM by ProwlerPC.)
#23
Member
Posts: 3,121
Threads: 104
Joined: Jun 2008

Oh hey sure. The Nomad Alien guns, the biological ones, can be put on human fighters. Let's equip them. Nevermind self control, it's doable, let's do it. What matters is that they can be equipped by human fighters. Please don't take that away.

/sarcasm

edit add: in all seriousness, delete the dam mistake or nerf it.

[Image: GMG_banner.png]
Reply  
Offline Hidamari
01-13-2014, 12:02 AM,
#24
Member
Posts: 2,100
Threads: 217
Joined: Jul 2009

(01-12-2014, 08:03 PM)ProwlerPC Wrote: Oh hey sure. The Nomad Alien guns, the biological ones, can be put on human fighters. Let's equip them. Nevermind self control, it's doable, let's do it. What matters is that they can be equipped by human fighters. Please don't take that away.

/sarcasm

edit add: in all seriousness, delete the dam mistake or nerf it.

which mistake? and im sure if people had access to the nomad guns, we would be having this conversation again. Tongue

[Image: RKaqSve.png]
Reply  
Offline McNeo
01-13-2014, 12:23 AM, (This post was last modified: 01-13-2014, 12:29 AM by McNeo.)
#25
Member
Posts: 3,424
Threads: 52
Joined: Aug 2006

Liberty produces two top secret prototype battleships.

Both were stolen.

2/10 would not build again.

As for spyglass scanner on stuff, no reason to take away toys from people who can afford them. I mean, you are part of the same crowd that believes in the freedom of indies, so why take this away from everybody except those ships Omicron singled out? Doesn't make sense to me. I cant afford them myself.
  Reply  
Offline Kazinsal
01-13-2014, 12:31 AM,
#26
Wizard
Posts: 4,541
Threads: 230
Joined: Sep 2009

(01-12-2014, 12:36 PM)Hidamari Wrote: Some admin green or dev amber would be appreciated on that topic.

It has been my intention for a while to limit the Spyglass Scanner to Spyglass-platform starships (Arbiter, Resheph, and anything SRPed) and to limit Battleship Scanners to battleship-class starships only. I do not yet have the final OK to implement this, but I am continuing to push for it.

(01-12-2014, 01:17 PM)Omicron Wrote: Conclusion, the only factions capable to utilize the scanner (and on specific ships only INRP) are The Order (Resheph), LN/LSF ("experimental cruiser"), Hellfire Legion (Spyglass/Arbiter) and Lane Hackers (who cannot field Spyglasses to my knowledge anymore).

Forgot one.

Retired, permanently.
Reply  
Offline Govedo13
01-13-2014, 12:40 AM, (This post was last modified: 01-13-2014, 12:51 AM by Govedo13.)
#27
Member
Posts: 4,663
Threads: 97
Joined: Jul 2009

You all care too much about in RP situation ignoring more important stuff like game mechanics and range of CDs,detection range and line speeds.
You should try to pirate BS or spyglass scanner equipped traders on the lines. If the said trader is not retarded he cannot be pirated,sad that you all miss that one.
I fail in that dunno how to counter their extreme range, may be this game breaking feature would speed the things up. I really wonder if the people that add such game breaking stuff ever test it before implementation.

€œ
(10-09-2013, 10:51 AM)Knjaz Wrote: Official faction players that are often accused of elitism, never deploy them and have those weird, immersion killing "fair fight/dueling" suicidal hobbies. (yes, i've seen enough of those lolduels, where house military with overwhelming force on the field willingly loses a pilot in a duel. ffs.)

Reply  
Offline Jack_Henderson
01-13-2014, 12:56 AM,
#28
Independent Miners Guild
Posts: 6,103
Threads: 391
Joined: Nov 2010

(01-13-2014, 12:31 AM)Kazinsal Wrote: It has been my intention for a while to limit the Spyglass Scanner to Spyglass-platform starships (Arbiter, Resheph, and anything SRPed) and to limit Battleship Scanners to battleship-class starships only. I do not yet have the final OK to implement this, but I am continuing to push for it.

So a lot of players wasted hundreds of millions/billions on (then useless) equipment and you destroy the single new money sink that successfully managed to regulate the banks of wealthy players (if you get it your way). Wow.

Cool way to wreck something for doubtful reasons (why would only a Battleship be able to do it? It is some vague, arbitrary, totally random setting - nothing else) that worked to drain these heaps of money that are a problem for the game.

Can't say I like the way you are going.


I agree that the 25k are a powerful. And can be negative for gameplay. So a change is okay:

That's why I suggested to turn today's BS-Scanners into a "widely available, but still 250 million" version that sees 20k. => money sink. Not OP any more.

Then you can have you special Spyglass and BS-scanner as exclusive BS-toys and a new class, without making all those players who invested look like idiots who suddenly can dump their very expensive toys.

+ IMG| DISCORD: https://discord.gg/TWrGWjp
+ IMG| IS RECRUITING: Click to find out more!
Reply  
Offline Hidamari
01-13-2014, 12:58 AM, (This post was last modified: 01-13-2014, 01:00 AM by Hidamari.)
#29
Member
Posts: 2,100
Threads: 217
Joined: Jul 2009

(01-13-2014, 12:23 AM)McNeo Wrote: Liberty produces two top secret prototype battleships.

Both were stolen.

2/10 would not build again.

As for spyglass scanner on stuff, no reason to take away toys from people who can afford them. I mean, you are part of the same crowd that believes in the freedom of indies, so why take this away from everybody except those ships Omicron singled out? Doesn't make sense to me. I cant afford them myself.

As I stated up there somewhere, I have absolutely no intention on taking away anyones toys, this thread is about my own piece of mind really and thats as far as I wanted it to go. If people can afford them then im not really bothered if they have them, "knock yourselves out" as the saying goes.

I was planning to upgrade 75th ships with these big scanners to make our scout squadron really "complete", however what i didnt want to happen was to do all that trading, all those runs back and forth collecting 3.5 billion credits just for devs to limit the scanners so our scimitars cant even mount them anyway, so we are left with three dozen useless scanners.

and since Kazinsal has just revealed that hes pushing for this tech to be limited im ALREADY worried about the one Battleship scanner we spent 3-4 months saving up for one we own on our cruiser.

[Image: RKaqSve.png]
Reply  
Offline sindroms
01-13-2014, 01:21 AM,
#30
Member
Posts: 9,435
Threads: 985
Joined: Feb 2008

If ex-miners like Red Hessians can have a battleship or xenos attaining jump drives and cloaks, then I think we can deal with a couple of snubs with BS scanners.

Game mechanics and balance was never intended to be in RP.

--------------
PSA: If you have been having stutter/FPS lag on Disco where it does not run as smoothly as other games, please look at the fix here: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...pid2306502
----------
Reply  
Pages (6): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode