• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 142 143 144 145 146 … 779 Next »
are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP?

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll: Are spyglass and battleship scanners oorp on fighters, freighters and small transports?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
yes
56.67%
34 56.67%
no
43.33%
26 43.33%
Total 60 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Pages (6): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP?
Offline Reid
01-13-2014, 01:46 AM,
#31
Member
Posts: 1,474
Threads: 90
Joined: Jun 2011

(01-13-2014, 12:31 AM)Kazinsal Wrote: It has been my intention for a while to limit the Spyglass Scanner to Spyglass-platform starships (Arbiter, Resheph, and anything SRPed) and to limit Battleship Scanners to battleship-class starships only. I do not yet have the final OK to implement this, but I am continuing to push for it.

Woo, limit one type of scanner to two ships, one that isn't available to the public and the other that can't do anything useful.

[Image: bNOgUUq.png]
Reply  
Offline McNeo
01-13-2014, 02:27 AM,
#32
Member
Posts: 3,424
Threads: 52
Joined: Aug 2006

(01-13-2014, 12:58 AM)Hidamari Wrote:
(01-13-2014, 12:23 AM)McNeo Wrote: Liberty produces two top secret prototype battleships.

Both were stolen.

2/10 would not build again.

As for spyglass scanner on stuff, no reason to take away toys from people who can afford them. I mean, you are part of the same crowd that believes in the freedom of indies, so why take this away from everybody except those ships Omicron singled out? Doesn't make sense to me. I cant afford them myself.

As I stated up there somewhere, I have absolutely no intention on taking away anyones toys, this thread is about my own piece of mind really and thats as far as I wanted it to go. If people can afford them then im not really bothered if they have them, "knock yourselves out" as the saying goes.

I was planning to upgrade 75th ships with these big scanners to make our scout squadron really "complete", however what i didnt want to happen was to do all that trading, all those runs back and forth collecting 3.5 billion credits just for devs to limit the scanners so our scimitars cant even mount them anyway, so we are left with three dozen useless scanners.

and since Kazinsal has just revealed that hes pushing for this tech to be limited im ALREADY worried about the one Battleship scanner we spent 3-4 months saving up for one we own on our cruiser.

That's a good reason. Given how much gets changed around, its good to ask about these things. I too would be quite livid if that were to happen to me after all that time. Good call, and apologies for being presumptuous.
  Reply  
Offline Thargoid
01-13-2014, 02:55 AM, (This post was last modified: 01-13-2014, 03:05 AM by Thargoid.)
#33
Member
Posts: 713
Threads: 65
Joined: Aug 2013

I have 4 of them.

So if they nerf them I've wasted a bil.

Loads of others have them too, that's billions of credits and hundreds of hours people have put in to buy an upgrade that's now useless (assuming this gets implemented).

Does it really matter if it's ooRP? Half the things I see on this server are ooRP and ridiculous, capspam for one, traders destroying their own cargo before asking to be killed, lone BCs chasing down a smuggler in a freighter, people hauling ore in a Luxury Liner, pirates pirating in cruisers. None of this really bothers me that much, it's kinda funny, and at the end of the day, it's just a game.

Keep the money sink IMO, and while you're there make a CAU9 with 4.2 multiplier that costs 2.5 Billion. Anything that keeps people trading/mining is a good thing.

LH~ | [75th] | LR-
Reply  
Offline ProwlerPC
01-13-2014, 07:18 PM,
#34
Member
Posts: 3,121
Threads: 104
Joined: Jun 2008

The fact that I support Indies and their freedoms has no bearing in my opinion about the spyglass scanner. This would affect both factions and indies. No it's not some new money sink that was created. That thing is old, very old. My attitude towards wanting all ID, equipment and ship open to the public also has no bearing on my feeling of that scanner. Otherwise I'd be championing the idea of letting Fighters equip Mortar turrets. If we've made a leap forward in technology that the once classified spyglass array is now small enough to fit in a snub ad is no longer classified then please make it so and get it out on the markets around Sirius. Rename it and give it a proper history. Or will these same people who don't want it restricted to the one shipclass push for it to be restricted to a Zone or set of certain factions?

[Image: GMG_banner.png]
Reply  
Offline aakopa
01-13-2014, 07:47 PM,
#35
Member
Posts: 566
Threads: 7
Joined: Jul 2012

(01-13-2014, 12:31 AM)Kazinsal Wrote:
(01-12-2014, 12:36 PM)Hidamari Wrote: Some admin green or dev amber would be appreciated on that topic.

It has been my intention for a while to limit the Spyglass Scanner to Spyglass-platform starships (Arbiter, Resheph, and anything SRPed) and to limit Battleship Scanners to battleship-class starships only. I do not yet have the final OK to implement this, but I am continuing to push for it.

(01-12-2014, 01:17 PM)Omicron Wrote: Conclusion, the only factions capable to utilize the scanner (and on specific ships only INRP) are The Order (Resheph), LN/LSF ("experimental cruiser"), Hellfire Legion (Spyglass/Arbiter) and Lane Hackers (who cannot field Spyglasses to my knowledge anymore).

Forgot one.
Yes, plz

[Image: 500px-Bowexsig.jpg]
  Reply  
Offline Venkman
01-13-2014, 08:05 PM, (This post was last modified: 01-13-2014, 08:07 PM by Venkman.)
#36
Fellow Junker
Posts: 3,496
Threads: 222
Joined: Jun 2011

Yeah, it is OORP and i thing the best thing would be if BS and Spyglass scanner could not be mountable for fighters.

User was banned for: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...tid=206147
https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...tid=206210
Time left: (Permanent)
  Reply  
Offline Thargoid
01-13-2014, 09:44 PM, (This post was last modified: 01-13-2014, 09:54 PM by Thargoid.)
#37
Member
Posts: 713
Threads: 65
Joined: Aug 2013

Also while we're there, let's ban Cruisers from pirating, nerf transport guns coz they're so OP it's ridiculous, ban Battleships from hunting unlawful snubs and enforcing smuggling laws, ban Liners from hauling anything but human cargo, ban RPing and chatting before piracy coz that wouldn't happen 90% of the time (especially with Xenos), all of this is ooRP and is allowed/enforced coz ya know, it's fun.

And I mostly pirate, and hardly ever trade, so I'm actually at a disadvantage here, but the 25K scanners can't see through jumpgates Wink

Not only that but most people who trade are new players that can't afford these scanners, and those who can, (mostly) are so rich they trade for the RP mostly and don't care about pirates.

During my time pirating with a 25K scanner, I've seen one trader jump out of the lane at 25K, this is out of hundreds of encounters around trade lanes. Most of 'em don't even bother jumping out of the lane at 10k.

LH~ | [75th] | LR-
Reply  
Offline Thexare
01-13-2014, 11:03 PM,
#38
Ominously Humming
Posts: 3,821
Threads: 340
Joined: Apr 2008

Didn't you quit?
Reply  
Offline Thargoid
01-13-2014, 11:09 PM,
#39
Member
Posts: 713
Threads: 65
Joined: Aug 2013

Yeah, twice.

I give up trying to quit now...

LH~ | [75th] | LR-
Reply  
Offline Kazinsal
01-13-2014, 11:11 PM,
#40
Wizard
Posts: 4,541
Threads: 230
Joined: Sep 2009

Request a ban.

Works 99.8% of the time.

Retired, permanently.
Reply  
Pages (6): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode