• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 72 73 74 75 76 … 547 Next »
What about that recon cruiser?

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3 Next »
What about that recon cruiser?
Offline Sonja
04-17-2016, 01:16 AM,
#11
Member
Posts: 814
Threads: 56
Joined: Jul 2007

I've been lamenting the lack of a heavy cruiser option for Liberty for half a decade.

I'm looking forwards to a 11-14 gun heavy cruiser option to fill the only remaining gaping tactical hole in the liberty capital ship fleet. Hopefully that time will come to an end with something like this. Or really, anything that can put a large number of cruiser guns on to a target without relying on a pair of poorly placed battleship slots (battlecruiser) or the very good but not very flexible forward gun (siege cruiser).

The pictures don't show the size though. However, I imagine that it can be changed with the requirements of its role as hopefully a many gun heavy cruiser.

I'm looking forwards to flying something like this as an open third option in the Liberty cruiser class selection. I'm tired of flying a siege cruiser, or wishing that I was flying a Kusari battlecruiser rather than a Liberty battlecruiser.
Reply  
Offline Lythrilux
04-17-2016, 01:20 AM,
#12
Edgy Worlds
Posts: 10,362
Threads: 737
Joined: Jan 2013

(04-17-2016, 01:16 AM)Sonja Wrote: or wishing that I was flying a Kusari battlecruiser rather than a Liberty battlecruiser.

WAT, who does this???

LABC is the best BC in the game. It's the grandfather of all BCs. Every BC is basically just a C&P of the LABC with a different model. KuBC is actually one of the worst BCs in the game because it has 2 heavies instead of 4.

[Image: Lythrilux.gif]
Reply  
Offline Sonja
04-17-2016, 01:59 AM,
#13
Member
Posts: 814
Threads: 56
Joined: Jul 2007

Maybe that's true now, but I remember when the Kusari battlecruiser had a thruster whereas the LABC didn't, and it also had a more even distribution of arcs for its primaries including no blind spots where neither could fire.

Of course, its a memory of its time. I have no idea what they're like now.
Reply  
Offline Lythrilux
04-17-2016, 02:03 AM,
#14
Edgy Worlds
Posts: 10,362
Threads: 737
Joined: Jan 2013

Yeah, KuBC and Bullhead are similiar. They had shoddy stats/arcs or some other deficiency that cripples the effectiveness of the ship because stats wise they're still built as if they're unique BCs with thrusters (which isn't the case anymore since all BCs have thrusters). BCs in general really need a rework (and haste senpai should let me do it).

[Image: Lythrilux.gif]
Reply  
Offline Sonja
04-17-2016, 02:11 AM,
#15
Member
Posts: 814
Threads: 56
Joined: Jul 2007

I'm sure it'll get fixed once the balance team decide what combat role they want battlecruisers to fulfill.

Back to the point though.

Yes, Liberty main line heavy cruiser please. I want. Much more than yet another battleship.
Reply  
Offline Jayce
04-17-2016, 02:13 AM,
#16
Heads Will Roll
Posts: 2,167
Threads: 141
Joined: Nov 2008

(04-17-2016, 01:59 AM)Sonja Wrote: Maybe that's true now, but I remember when the Kusari battlecruiser had a thruster whereas the LABC didn't, and it also had a more even distribution of arcs for its primaries including no blind spots where neither could fire.

Of course, its a memory of its time. I have no idea what they're like now.

You remembered wrong. The only BC that had a thruster when the others didn't was the Bullhead.

LABC, Argus, etc didn't have one.

[Image: jKk7NOg.png][Image: 1iGGFXz.gif]
Reply  
Offline t0l
04-17-2016, 02:13 AM,
#17
Space Operator
Posts: 1,827
Threads: 134
Joined: Feb 2013

I'd trade the carrier for a proper heavy cruiser.

[Image: PFjFVMW.png]
Reply  
Offline Sonja
04-17-2016, 02:14 AM,
#18
Member
Posts: 814
Threads: 56
Joined: Jul 2007

(04-17-2016, 02:13 AM)Jayce Wrote:
(04-17-2016, 01:59 AM)Sonja Wrote: Maybe that's true now, but I remember when the Kusari battlecruiser had a thruster whereas the LABC didn't, and it also had a more even distribution of arcs for its primaries including no blind spots where neither could fire.

Of course, its a memory of its time. I have no idea what they're like now.

You remembered wrong. The only BC that had a thruster when the others didn't was the Bullhead.

LABC, Argus, etc didn't have one.

Yeah, except I flew the KUBC with Ench, and it had a thruster.

Please don't be so presumptuous with me.
Reply  
Offline Jayce
04-17-2016, 02:14 AM,
#19
Heads Will Roll
Posts: 2,167
Threads: 141
Joined: Nov 2008

STOP IM TRYING TO SRP THE RECON CRUISER FOR LSF

STOP ASKING FOR IT FOR ANYTHING ELSE

[Image: jKk7NOg.png][Image: 1iGGFXz.gif]
Reply  
Offline Wesker
04-17-2016, 02:15 AM,
#20
Level 99 Boss
Posts: 5,296
Threads: 457
Joined: Nov 2014

(04-17-2016, 02:14 AM)Jayce Wrote: STOP IM TRYING TO SRP THE RECON CRUISER FOR LSF

STOP ASKING FOR IT FOR ANYTHING ELSE

It will need balance testing tho : )

[Image: P6DLUCr.png?4][Image: AX5RcTh.png?4]
Reply  
Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode