• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Rules & Requests Rules
« Previous 1 … 183 184 185 186 187 … 198 Next »
An engagement question by 'ol DL

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (2): 1 2 Next »
An engagement question by 'ol DL
Offline Dusty Lens
05-15-2008, 05:53 PM,
#1
Member
Posts: 6,664
Threads: 438
Joined: Dec 2007

Being whom I am I see it as a sort of social responsibility to be a cheeky fellow. On more than one occasion I've found myself in a position of fleeing with the local constabulary hot on my heels. A move that I've dropped more than once is to kill the 'ol engines, flip about and CD the fellows giving me chase.

Oh but how they dislike that!

My question: If I'm fleeing from a fight and I pull that move am I performing all manner of re-engaging? Furthermore, if I've not yet been engaged and I pull that stunt, once I engage my cruise engines again am I now fleeing the fight?

I have my own two cents on the subject, but I'm curious as to the opinions o' folks smarter than I (re: most everyone).
Reply  
Offline NonSequitor
05-15-2008, 06:08 PM, (This post was last modified: 05-15-2008, 06:09 PM by NonSequitor.)
#2
Member
Posts: 911
Threads: 116
Joined: Dec 2007

Personally, I think that your cd-tactic is pretty slick.

Bravo! I like that kind of thinking outside of the proverbial box.

But methinks that it could be interpreted by some as being a form of re-engagement.
  Reply  
Offline Laowai
05-15-2008, 06:12 PM,
#3
Member
Posts: 1,452
Threads: 181
Joined: Dec 2007


It could be interpreted as a reingagement if someone wanted to be a whiny pedantic git.....


i like it, its like tossing the proverbial banana peel over your shoulder as you run away, and you dont wanna do damage, just slow them down

http://img686.imageshack.us/img686/3289/...047770.png
Reply  
Offline Xoria
05-15-2008, 06:15 PM,
#4
Black Hat Economist
Posts: 2,122
Threads: 244
Joined: Oct 2007
Staff roles:

Seems like a kosher tactic to me.

Anyone who reports you for that is one sore loser.


Check out my
Trade Development Blog
for all the latest news on Nerfs and Final Nails, or to request trade changes.

An Interactive Tour of OSC Routes  | POB Supplies
Reply  
Offline jammi
05-15-2008, 08:00 PM,
#5
Badger Pilot
Posts: 6,564
Threads: 362
Joined: Aug 2007
Staff roles:
Story Dev
Economy Dev

Surely it could only be classed as a re-engagement if you took persuer's sheilds down to 50%, which I believe is impossible with any Cruise Disruptor. That's how I interpreted the rules anyway.

[Image: redon.gif]
[Image: f0D5b.png][Image: O2Zu5.png][Image: IlS2I.png][Image: yNeaK.png][Image: 9zbjr.png][Image: D7RGg.png]
News article library, feedback and content requests.
Reply  
Offline Gurra Himself
05-15-2008, 08:08 PM,
#6
Member
Posts: 29
Threads: 1
Joined: Apr 2008

I agree
  Reply  
Offline Muleo
05-15-2008, 09:15 PM,
#7
Member
Posts: 862
Threads: 38
Joined: Jan 2008

Sadly, a cruise disrupter counts as a full attack. It's stupid, but if you fire a cruise disrupter, engage cruise, then cruise disrupt him again, it's reengagement, but it's more of a technicality than a real rule..


Quote:*For purposes of these Rules, an attack is draining shields to 50% or lower, or hull damage, or when a Cruise Disruptor is fired. Intentional ramming of any large ship is also considered an attack.
  Reply  
Offline mjolnir
05-15-2008, 09:19 PM,
#8
Member
Posts: 3,774
Threads: 71
Joined: Sep 2007

If he follows you... then you can do this... he can just let you go and you MUST leave the system... if he decides to follow you instead.. you are "being chased" and you can re-engage with everything.

Quote:5.6 If a player engages cruise engine or docks during a PvP fight, this player is considered fleeing. The fleeing player must leave and may not re-enter the system where the fight took place with any of the characters on his/her account(s) while the enemy (player or players involved in the fight) remains in the system, but no more than 4 hours.

However, the fleeing player can re-engage at will if chased.

[Image: sigiw102.jpg]
Igiss says: Martin, you give them a finger, they bite off your arm.
Reply  
Offline Dusty Lens
05-15-2008, 09:19 PM,
#9
Member
Posts: 6,664
Threads: 438
Joined: Dec 2007

Well that settles that!

Oh well, I'll be cautious with that move then!
Reply  
Offline Boss
05-15-2008, 09:23 PM,
#10
Member
Posts: 5,125
Threads: 101
Joined: Jan 2008

Just be careful with that bloody EK, that you don't hit a star or some other larger heavenly object!

Zealot Wrote:Just go play the game and have fun dammit.
Treewyrm Wrote:all in all the conclusion is that disco doesn't need antagonist factions, it doesn't need phantoms, it doesn't need nomads, it doesn't need coalition and it doesn't need many other things, no AIs, the game is hijacked by morons to confuse the game with their dickwaving generic competition games mixed up with troll-of-the-day.
Reply  
Pages (2): 1 2 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode