(09-07-2020, 04:26 PM)J308 Wrote: Corsair Council have agreements with AI and Zoners, not even 2 week this IE groups came nowhere attacked Zoners,AI and other faction. Would you think that people you have agreement with attack you, while being away?.
Also siegers didnt demand anything. defenders asked for what demands would be.
Demands are not necessary to siege POB within ZOI.
There is no Legitimacy of this group just some random RP, they siege in the name of Corsair's while they are not even part of it by any means.
Defenders attacked and kept attacking until base went to few % HP and only then asked "how can we stop this?". Welp, if asked means an ooRP lament in local chat
(09-07-2020, 04:26 PM)J308 Wrote: Corsair Council have agreements with AI and Zoners, not even 2 week this IE groups came nowhere attacked Zoners,AI and other faction. Would you think that people you have agreement with attack you, while being away?.
Also siegers didnt demand anything. defenders asked for what demands would be.
Demands are not necessary to siege POB within ZOI.
There is no Legitimacy of this group just some random RP, they siege in the name of Corsair's while they are not even part of it by any means.
They have Corsair ID. They broke no rules. Legit siege. Just because you don't like it doesn't make them any less legit than any AI faction right now.
Instead of bringing your personal bias, see that what they did was within rules and thus you cannot blame them for that. Whether you like it or not, that's just opinion.
I think that sieging POB that is extension of NPC base is wrong but there is nothing that stops people from doing except their own sportsmanship. In this case, faction was obviously going for the kill and they did not care about anything else. It's a shame but legit approach.
(09-07-2020, 04:26 PM)J308 Wrote: Corsair Council have agreements with AI and Zoners, not even 2 week this IE groups came nowhere attacked Zoners,AI and other faction. Would you think that people you have agreement with attack you, while being away?.
Also siegers didnt demand anything. defenders asked for what demands would be.
Demands are not necessary to siege POB within ZOI.
There is no Legitimacy of this group just some random RP, they siege in the name of Corsair's while they are not even part of it by any means.
They have Corsair ID. They broke no rules. Legit siege. Just because you don't like it doesn't make them any less legit than any AI faction right now.
Instead of bringing your personal bias, see that what they did was within rules and thus you cannot blame them for that. Whether you like it or not, that's just opinion.
I think that sieging POB that is extension of NPC base is wrong but there is nothing that stops people from doing except their own sportsmanship. In this case, faction was obviously going for the kill and they did not care about anything else. It's a shame but legit approach.
(09-07-2020, 04:26 PM)J308 Wrote: Corsair Council have agreements with AI and Zoners, not even 2 week this IE groups came nowhere attacked Zoners,AI and other faction. Would you think that people you have agreement with attack you, while being away?.
Also siegers didnt demand anything. defenders asked for what demands would be.
Demands are not necessary to siege POB within ZOI.
There is no Legitimacy of this group just some random RP, they siege in the name of Corsair's while they are not even part of it by any means.
They have Corsair ID. They broke no rules. Legit siege. Just because you don't like it doesn't make them any less legit than any AI faction right now.
Instead of bringing your personal bias, see that what they did was within rules and thus you cannot blame them for that. Whether you like it or not, that's just opinion.
I think that sieging POB that is extension of NPC base is wrong but there is nothing that stops people from doing except their own sportsmanship. In this case, faction was obviously going for the kill and they did not care about anything else. It's a shame but legit approach.
If you call that declaration a "rp" I have nothing else to say to you.
Short roleplay is still roleplay. Whether you think it is good or bad, short or long, is just your opinion and doesn't matter in terms of rules. You can call me evil or whatever, but I am man of facts. I don't like how this siege was conducted on both sides and sadly I wasn't there to protect AI POB, but the siege was rule abiding from Corsair side.
whoaaaa such a nice topic here , people are looking to understand the logic of IDs, faction, players ( there never was )." Gammu PoB is dead, assin pilot, crime of war, blah, blah, blah, blah." Already seeing Order coming to do shit ( like this ) , you get a small idea of the mentality of the faction, while it is well marked that they are enemies with the Corsairs and not with the Gammu (I'm not saying they attacked the PoB), otherwise I don't give a damn about the PoB, but as Wesker says "Sieges always bring out the worst in players/factions" that allowed to see the real mentality of the players/factions.
Otherwise, it was cool to see people being killed by the drones.
All Things considered - the siege was actually awesome, generated loads of fighting between 5 factions, topped official events in terms of kills and activity - this PoB death actually should be a model for ones that do work. A far cry from the usual AFK fest - the attackers had to be constantly on their toes and got wiped out many times!
This siege had some good fights because Aux goal was to generate activity as well, not to protect the pob for any cost. At least this is what I believe
Posts: 6,633
Threads: 515
Joined: Nov 2014
Staff roles: Art Developer
(09-07-2020, 09:44 PM)Groshyr Wrote: This siege had some good fights because Aux goal was to generate activity as well, not to protect the pob for any cost. At least this is what I believe
We knew that the base was destined to lose because it's quite literally one segment of the community versus one small group.