• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 578 579 580 581 582 … 779 Next »
Regarding the restriction on Liberty caps

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (26): « Previous 1 … 15 16 17 18 19 … 26 Next »
Regarding the restriction on Liberty caps
Offline jpo
11-10-2008, 12:25 PM, (This post was last modified: 11-10-2008, 12:31 PM by jpo.)
#161
Member
Posts: 332
Threads: 26
Joined: Aug 2008

' Wrote:Yes, but you ignore the fact that the admin team has too much on their plate to make sure the server is "fun" for everyone.
Quote:If the true problem is that soo many people are OORP that it is hurting life as a pirate and the admin team needs more people to police that, I would agree to whatever changes had to be made.
Yes, I completely ignored that, and by completely ignored I mean directly addressed.

Quote:Explain to me why a player should be able to abuse his big ship by whoring the little guy
Hmmm. A battleship vs a fighter ~ the fighter has no prayer. A bomber vs a whale ~ whale has no prayer.

I guess for the same reason.
Reply  
Offline cal823
11-10-2008, 12:39 PM,
#162
Member
Posts: 87
Threads: 12
Joined: Oct 2008

I think that all cap ships should require a go ahead from the appropiate faction before buying one.
Why? because they dont sell em on the open market like smaller ships, they build them for a specific purpose.

Quote:We reserve the right to keep and arm bears
I reserve the right to keep and arm Jarek.
  Reply  
Offline Seth Karlo
11-10-2008, 01:40 PM,
#163
Member
Posts: 2,985
Threads: 141
Joined: Apr 2008

Well, whenever I am in command when other LN are online, I alway's send some people to California, Texas, Colorado, leave a couple in NY, I might patrol Bering becuase of the tensions between Rhienland and Liberty right now etc etc.

We do try this stuff, but people do seem to focus on what we get wrong rather than what we get right...:(

[Image: SethSig.png]
Signature by Sleipnir.
  Reply  
Offline Tomtomrawr
11-10-2008, 01:58 PM,
#164
Guardian of the Void
Posts: 3,224
Threads: 242
Joined: Nov 2007

' Wrote:Now, I feel I need to write some explanation of this given it's not going to make me a popular man.

http://discoverygc.com/forums/index.php?sh...mp;#entry406762

Lately the LNS cap fleet has increased rather a lot, and I have seen some somewhat dubious gameplay practices with it. Battlecruisers being used to attack lone xenos or rogues in fighters simply isn't ok. People should have more respect than that.

The number of capitol ships in liberty is beyond that of anywhere else in sirius, it's utterly unrealistic in terms of roleplay, and often causes real issues, making whole groups of unlawful players unable to operate as well as making the [LN] faction largely redundant, simply due to the extraordinary numbers of LNS caps floating around.

I don't like to see Manhattan space used as a parking lot. People just siting there with little or nothing to do... It's bad RP. This measure was largely taken in order to make the game more fun for unlawful players, who of late have been complaining of massive overkill, and kill-whoring from many players on the lawfl side in liberty.

I don't take this decision lightly, and it hurts me rather a lot to think that I am the cause of restriction on other peoples roleplay, however I am so tired of seeing unlawful players being unable to act as they should do, it makes me sick. Now I am going to be introducing a sceme whereby people can get themselves a cap should they show responsibility in their actions, and decent roleplay. A function and purpose for the ship, other than simply to just pew pew on the pirates.

That said it was a group decision, made by the whole LN admiralty, that being Myself, Titan, Vincent, and Severe Trinity. It was completely unanimous and I volunteered to make the post.

I don't like to think that I am in any way superiour to other people in roleplay, or that I am suitable as a judge for it, however I also see a real problem, and no-one else willing to take it on.

I know I'm going to catch a lot of flak for this, but please don't think I am doing it out of spite for other people, or to 'beat down on the indies'. It's not about that. It is simply to try to curb the cap-spam that I see so regularly, that makes other people have a crap time.

I have often felt guilty about the state of liberty's lawfuls and I thought something needed to be done. Ironically however, the solution also makes me feel pretty bad as well. Whether this is the right thing or not, only time will tell. If it doesn't work then I'm willing to try another approach, perhaps one with a totally different emphasis.

I am taking my lead on this from the RM, as they don't have the issues that liberty has, they may have other issues, but they're different ones.

Besides, this will only be in effect until the next version of the mod. I am hoping that the new ID system will sort the problem, and people will e able to operate properly in liberty. From both my lawful's perpective and my unlawful perpective fewer cap vessels can only be a good thing.

Please comment on this here rather than in the thread in which I issue the order, as I'd like to that stay clean if possible.

In the immortal words of Dusty Lens... *places pie in thread and waits 30 minutes*

edit: I just want to add to this, that if it doesn't work then I'm not afraid to say I was wrong.


I'm sorry i do not have time to go through the 17 pages of this thread, but from the first post i think your right.

I recently made an LNS character, rather new (LNS-Oregon, Liberty Cruiser) and i am now considering changing it to a Rhienland cruiser.

I think the reason that so many people choose Liberty is because that is where the most action is. There are always pirate attacks on New York like everyday, it's quite oorp for attacks of that scale everyday (dreadnaughts and batleships), but now i'm gona go and buy a Rhienland cruiser i think, i wanted one in the first place.

[17:45:39] Wolfs Ghost (Murphy): Tom, you have problems. Go kill yourself.
[19:25:12] Johnny (Jam): Tomtom, I will beat you with a spoon.
[14:22:56] Prarabdh Thakur: KILL HIM WITH A SHEEP.
[17:40:48] Eagle (Junes): Tom should be slapped with a spoon.
[11:32:18] Warspite: Thank you for being so awesome Tom. <3
[18:17:36] Metano: I love you tomtom
[20:06:24] Warspite: I will seriously give you epic head.
' Wrote:Edit: also, Tomtomrawr, fappin' like a boss.
Reply  
Offline kingvaillant
11-10-2008, 04:58 PM,
#165
Member
Posts: 2,961
Threads: 207
Joined: Aug 2007

Now something people must understand. Indies and factionalized members;

RESPECT MUST GO BOTH WAYS

If there is one thing I hate, it is a facton member menacing an indie of demotion, when the member himself is in no position to do so (unless HC of a faction).

It is not only about respect Out-of-char, like on Skype, but also respect in RP, in game. If you ask an other to shove off impolitely or make treats, what do you expect ffs?

Same thing for indies doubting the faction affiliation of the member (Alias, "you ain't really in "X" faction")

I also deeply dislike peeps "RP whining" in system chat. If you have an issue with a co-worker at job, will you go in the cafeteria and yell out loud what you think about the guy? Of course NOT! You'll keep it private!

Director of the Liberty Security Force: Fidelity, Bravery and Integrity
[Image: f_48123637838m_812390c.png]
The Amundsen Zone-21 Restrictions
  Reply  
Akumabito
11-10-2008, 05:10 PM,
#166
Unregistered
 

' Wrote:A battleship vs a fighter ~ the fighter has no prayer. A bomber vs a whale ~ whale has no prayer.

I guess for the same reason.


Exactly, it's a laugh when factions get 5 bombers and go whoring cap ships, then post here about cap whores, then go whining to their admin buddies to get people sanctioned, insult people in threads that the admins set up so the person being insulted can't reply, and then come here and whine some more about indies.

' Wrote:RESPECT MUST GO BOTH WAYS


That's actually funny. Respect has to start at the top here, and it doesn't.

AC Merc in his farewell thread pretty much spelled it out how this server is run.
Reply  
Offline Derkylos
11-10-2008, 05:13 PM,
#167
Member
Posts: 1,410
Threads: 48
Joined: Sep 2008

I'll second the motion that you spread out more. Whenever I'm looking for a LN ship (usually to report smugglers, etc), I always find them in New York. Rarely are they elsewhere. Colorado is always newbs.
My Bretonian gunboat will patrol everywhere that the trade lanes broadcast a BAF IFF, and you can too (except you're looking for Navy IFF...). That makes...New York, Colorado, California, Texas, Bering, Hudson, Kepler, Gallileo, Magellan, and Cortez, not to mention the new systems. If you even put one vessel in each system, that's 9(!) ships out of new york already...the capwhorage can't be that bad...can it?

[Image: 2ecf33o.png]
Reply  
Offline torchwood
11-10-2008, 05:25 PM,
#168
Member
Posts: 721
Threads: 54
Joined: Sep 2007

i have Sent my Cruiser history and report to admiral John Talon. until i get a reply i will go with this. i will decomission my cruiser for now, and if it needs to be, ( AKA my cruiser is denied )i will decomission it all together

[Image: 27wzuo4.png]
  Reply  
Offline Rudo
11-10-2008, 05:42 PM, (This post was last modified: 11-10-2008, 05:46 PM by Rudo.)
#169
Member
Posts: 1,411
Threads: 55
Joined: Jul 2008

' Wrote:Hmmm. A battleship vs a fighter ~ the fighter has no prayer. A bomber vs a whale ~ whale has no prayer.

I guess for the same reason.

Do factor in the relationships between each. There is a VAST difference between pirate-trader and police-pirate RoE. The pirate must make a demand and the trader only dooms himself by refusing to comply. The law officer is not bound by this rule and is weapons-free on sight (within the bounds of proper roleplay)

I rarely receive an offer for an alternative end to a confrontation on my lawful or unlawful characters when confronted by the other side.

This isn't a call for police/pirate players to be required to make a demand and allow enemies to leave if they comply. But this difference in relationships is a point that shouldn't be omitted when someone brings up ship balance.

[Image: DTdrqPU.gif]
Reply  
Offline MB52
11-10-2008, 06:12 PM,
#170
Member
Posts: 1,973
Threads: 130
Joined: Dec 2007

' Wrote:Do factor in the relationships between each. There is a VAST difference between pirate-trader and police-pirate RoE. The pirate must make a demand and the trader only dooms himself by refusing to comply. The law officer is not bound by this rule and is weapons-free on sight (within the bounds of proper roleplay)

Actually, no. EVERYONE must speak at least one sentence of RP before engaging anyone, or you could end up sanctioned. :$


I’ll carry this flag
To the grave if I must
Because it’s flag that I love
And a flag that I trust
  Reply  
Pages (26): « Previous 1 … 15 16 17 18 19 … 26 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode