I think that weapons should be invisible on Huegenot because of his little size. If you're mounting Battleships or Cruisers weapons on this little cruiser, all will be wasted. You're beautiful cruiser will look like a turtle with bumps everywhere.
Then Nomad fighter and Nomad weapons. I think they should look like Nomad Battleship Turrets, that keeps the spirit of strange and organic weapons.
SID! USE CORRECT GRAMMER OR AT LEAST USE PUNCTUATION!!! I can't read what you are typing and I speak English, think of people whos first language is not english they can't understand a word you say. Now please repost that in a way someone can read and understand, or if someone could translate what he meant because I'm not understanding any of it.
Also I agree battleships are too weak. With enough skill and good weapons a fighter should be able to still beat it but make it hard for them. Right now a noob could fire a few novas and take it out. Nova damage should be reduced or the BS, Cruiser, and GBs should have slightly stronger shields and countermeasures. Though whatever you do DO NOT add more hull.
-,- stop complaining about other people's grammer, etc. You don't have perfect grammar yourself, either. Also, his typing isn't THAT bad; that is, I can understand it all(after reading it twice).
Since you want a translation.....He says he wants more character accounts, and he has ideas for new ship names....
To hawkeye: If you run regedit, and you find your key, copy the file with it. Then change the key to something else. You can switch out the registry keys, changing the Online key, which gives you 10 characters. Most people who have 10 chars have 2 computers.
Quote:-,- stop complaining about other people's grammer, etc. You don't have perfect grammar yourself, either. Also, his typing isn't THAT bad; that is, I can understand it all(after reading it twice).
Since you want a translation.....He says he wants more character accounts, and he has ideas for new ship names....
To hawkeye: If you run regedit, and you find your key, copy the file with it. Then change the key to something else. You can switch out the registry keys, changing the Online key, which gives you 10 characters. Most people who have 10 chars have 2 computers.
Well, i will write my post in crapglish (sort of) and english, to compare:
English Wrote:I agree. Hull is ok. Shields are too weak. Increasing shield strenght to 400/500.000 is recomended.
Take as an example the Sci Fi series (exept star wars, where a huge battlestation is defeated by a proton torpedo). There, a fighter has NO chance of defeating a BS. No way. If we dont make BS REALLY HARD TO TAKE DOWN BY A FIGHTER, we risk the BS to become obsolete. I have a cruiser and a RH BS, and i consider both of them obsolete. Why? Because with any fighter with torps i can take down any BS in the game. (Exept a missile cruiser with more than 10 turrets)
Crapglish Wrote:I agree huls k sheids re to wek incresing sheids stregt t 400/500k s recomend tak s exaple the sci fi tv (leave st warz off ther BStation re pwnd by a lone fighter) ther a fighter s no chanz to pwn a BS cuz they to strong mak bs stronger r theyll bekme obsolete ive cruiser and rh bs n sont use becoz they r obsolete becoz a n00b with novas can kill me (missile cruis t included).
(Well, i cant write it in true l33t sp33ch because i have no idea how to do so. Remember that my native languaje is not english).
Now, can you see the huge diference between l33t and true english? Which one would you like to use? I prefer option 1: English. I dont like having to read the same post 3 times to [mis]understand what the hell is he trying to say.
WTF, If i can write in english (And it is not my first languaje) a British native like stealth or hawkeye should be able to write 10 times better than that crappy l33t. :rtfm: :angry: :angry2:
(If you find any mistake in my English, please let me know via a PM)
(Really, I speak terrible English, so please, tell me if I make mistakes. I'd like to improve it a bit )
khwain,Jan 26 2006, 04:08 PM Wrote:-,- stop complaining about other people's grammer, etc. You don't have perfect grammar yourself, either. Also, his typing isn't THAT bad; that is, I can understand it all(after reading it twice).
Since you want a translation.....He says he wants more character accounts, and he has ideas for new ship names....
[snapback]10978[/snapback]
Read the whole post before you post about it. I said SID not Hawkeye. Hawkeye at least spells them correctly enough to be able to read it. Sid's is so bad I can't understand even the first 3 words.
Korrd,Jan 26 2006, 04:11 PM Wrote:I agree. Hull is ok. Shields are too weak. Increasing shield strenght to 400/500.000 is recomended.
Take as an example the Sci Fi series (exept star wars, where a huge battlestation is defeated by a proton torpedo). There, a fighter has NO chance of defeating a BS. No way. If we dont make BS REALLY HARD TO TAKE DOWN BY A FIGHTER, we risk the BS to become obsolete. I have a cruiser and a RH BS, and i consider both of them obsolete. Why? Because with any fighter with torps i can take down any BS in the game. (Exept a missile cruiser with more than 10 turrets)
[snapback]10979[/snapback]
Notice in the storyline there is always 2-3 fighters helping you take down a battleship and even that many for cruisers. They do this to let you know that it should take more than one person or one very skilled person to take it down. I think the shield needs up or the Nova needs reduced to at least 40,000 instead of the 60,000 (or is it 80,000?)hull damage.
Korrd,Jan 26 2006, 11:11 PM Wrote:If we dont make BS REALLY HARD TO TAKE DOWN BY A FIGHTER, we risk the BS to become obsolete.
[snapback]10979[/snapback]
But wont upgrading the capital ships make fighters obsolete?
Dont get me wrong, Im all for making capital ships nearly invincible in a fight against a fighter. Im just worrying that everybody will start flying capital ships instead of fighters. We need a way to make it worthwhile for a capital ship to keep a few fighters around.
The first three words were: Well I meant -.-....If I can read it, so can you. You just don't take the time to try to understand. I could start talking with "thee's" "thou's" "thy's" and "ye's" and you'd probably get mad at me, even though it isn't incorrect english (sure, it's old....)
The problem with putting too much power into cap ships is that it will affect who flies what. If a cap ship can decimate a group of fighters, then everyone will be flying capships, which would just be plain annoying. But it IS true that novas do quite a bit of damage.....
f2k,Jan 26 2006, 01:28 PM Wrote:But wont upgrading the capital ships make fighters obsolete?
Dont get me wrong, Im all for making capital ships nearly invincible in a fight against a fighter. Im just worrying that everybody will start flying capital ships instead of fighters.
[snapback]10989[/snapback]
With the way some of the battleships dock at tradelanes and fly through asteriods, i wouldn't worry.
![[Image: ugtprofile3mm.png]](http://img343.imageshack.us/img343/2442/ugtprofile3mm.png)
![[Image: DFinal.png]](http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b328/Luciaden/DFinal.png)
![[Image: 3cfefe54.jpg]](http://lordkorrd.dynalias.org/docs/misc/3cfefe54.jpg)
)
![[Image: ugtf2k.png]](http://chaotica.dk/avatar/ugtf2k.png)
![[Image: Firebird.jpg]](http://img77.photobucket.com/albums/v235/-FIREBIRD-/Firebird.jpg)
![[Image: char_names.jpg]](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v235/-FIREBIRD-/char_names.jpg)