• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 695 696 697 698 699 … 779 Next »
ooc Non-Engagement Treaties

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

ooc Non-Engagement Treaties
Offline Maza
12-01-2007, 04:09 PM,
#4
Member
Posts: 8
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2007

' Wrote:So I have a big problem.

Some people like to engage me as soon as possible. Particularly right after I exit a trade lane, JH, JG. This gives me about one second to scan for ID and prepare myself. I really do not like it. It has caused me to become very nervous when I suddenly see someone on my scanner for the first time at 1.5k. And caused me to engage a few folks I would rather not have.
Well if someone attacks you then you have every right to defend yourself:

5.3 If a player is attacked*, he has a right to defend himself regardless of who is attacking. There are no restrictions for self-defense.

*For purposes of these Rules occasional shooting or shooting "for fun" does not count as an attack if it does not result in draining shields to 50% or lower or hull damage. Intentional ramming of any large ship is also considered an attack.

The way i interpret this is that you dont have to scan for an ID(it says no restrictions) if you are sure that the attacker isnt doing it "for fun" but in fact is out to kill you. That makes rule 6.6 void the way i see it...

But i dont know, i might be wrong.


.
  Reply  


Messages In This Thread
ooc Non-Engagement Treaties - by RickJames - 12-01-2007, 02:08 PM
ooc Non-Engagement Treaties - by Badger - 12-01-2007, 02:32 PM
ooc Non-Engagement Treaties - by tfmachad - 12-01-2007, 02:33 PM
ooc Non-Engagement Treaties - by Maza - 12-01-2007, 04:09 PM
ooc Non-Engagement Treaties - by Jwnantze - 12-01-2007, 04:19 PM
ooc Non-Engagement Treaties - by RickJames - 12-02-2007, 02:02 AM
ooc Non-Engagement Treaties - by Zapp - 12-02-2007, 04:27 AM
ooc Non-Engagement Treaties - by tfmachad - 12-02-2007, 04:37 AM
ooc Non-Engagement Treaties - by kingvaillant - 12-02-2007, 03:48 PM
ooc Non-Engagement Treaties - by Zapp - 12-03-2007, 02:29 AM
ooc Non-Engagement Treaties - by Caedes - 12-03-2007, 04:21 PM
ooc Non-Engagement Treaties - by tfmachad - 12-03-2007, 05:37 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode