Lore Discussion in regards to the Hogosha

[Dab]

Right?


Edit: The real issue here is not with Kishiro, although Dab couched the question that way. The real issue is with the GMG, who will hate the Hogosha no matter what, doesnt matter if they try to cuddle up to them or not. The Hogosha dont really attack Kishiro all that much, generally that is more a thing for the FA. The GMG, who own Okinawa? That is a different question, and probably the more important one.

Actually, the real issue is Kishiro, and GMG has absolutely nothing to do with this, and will continue to have nothing to do with these changes, regardless how much you attempt to bring them into it. I'm trying to make Hogosha's roleplay and lore conform to what the players think it should be, in regards to their relationship with Kishiro. That relationship directly affects their operations in Okinawa. If Hogosha aren't interested in remaining openly hostile to Kishiro, than they should not be openly attacking Isehara. As such, the lore in Oki might need adjusting.

Also Zelot, Hogosha do attack Kishiro in Okinawa. Hence this entire topic. By what you said, you seem to agree with me in that the Hogosha continuing to be openly hostile against Kishiro in Okinawa would be contrary to their new lore.



In regards to Slart's post I'd like to clarify that, though I said I could see Hogosha buddying up to Kishiro, I do feel it more likely that they try to play both sides of the fence;

[1:13:50 PM] Dabbykins: But I feel it is more likely
[1:13:53 PM | Edited 1:13:57 PM] Dabbykins: They try to play both sides of the fence

As I feel they wouldn't go away from Samura completely, especially considering their new operations in Nagano.

If I understood you well,you want to make hogosha a smuggler faction

No, I want to know what the Hogosha players want Hogosha to be. Then I can adjust the lore to conform to that.

---