• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion Discovery Mod Balance
« Previous 1 … 50 51 52 53 54 55 Next »
Always a bigger fish?

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard
Corsair Kills - 1 / 1,000
Lawful Kills - 13 / 1,000
Red Hessian Kills - 1 / 1,000
Unlawful Kills - 8 / 1,000

Latest activity

Poll: (about my comparison in 1st post)
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
close to the truth
44.44%
12 44.44%
incorrect
25.93%
7 25.93%
a whining n00b
29.63%
8 29.63%
Total 27 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Always a bigger fish?
Offline Kazyumi
01-13-2008, 01:29 AM,
#16
Member
Posts: 121
Threads: 9
Joined: Dec 2007

' Wrote:Also, Cruisers are often used as screening elements for BS's/Carriers and to take on other Cruisers.

They are also much much cheaper than a BS. While one on one a BS is almost always going to win against a cruiser; 2 Cruisers against 1 BS is much much different. And if we take mk8 armour out of the equation a group can afford 6 Cruisers for the cost of 1 BS. If we put mk8 armour on a BS...then a force can afford to field 12 Cruisers for that 1 BS.

So would a force rather lose one 1-2billion credit BS..or send 3 Cruisers and lose 1..maybe 2 of the cruisers if the cruiser pilots suck and the BS pilot is good. Thats only a loss of 150-300 million credits.

Well if you compare the costs to their performance, then one could atleast expect 1 thing to be better then the other if it's more expensive.
If we apply that formula, we'd have BS>Cr>GB.
However, in current form its more like: BS>GB>Cr if you get what I mean.

Statistically and numberically a fleet of 2 GBs can take down 1 Cr as it should (technical and numberal advantage). However a Cruiser just can't take a GB down because of their technical disadvantages - that isn't the statistical.

But there are other factors, yes numberically if there was a fleet worthy of the same cash but divided of more players that one should obvious win.

I suppose it's all a mathmatical equation in the end - and the Cruiser being left done maybe..

Quote:From - Elder Gentle. Pirate King of the OPG.
"Your actions have demonstrated once more the common sense and cunning diplomacy that the Junkers have become accustomed to applying in these delicate situation. I have been much encouraged by what you have said."
We like Feedback just like everybody else. Word has it everybody dislikes us, yet no one ever tells us why. I hope you could.

.:j:.The.Silver.Hand - .:j:. Recruitment Channel .:j:. - .:j:.Cash.Machine
.:j:.Rusty.Nail - .:j:. Yanagi Special Channel .:j:. - .:j:.Unwritten.Law
.:j:.Skip - .:j:. Transmission Channel .:j:. - .:j:.Scraper
.:j:.The.Rust.Bucket - .:j:. Feedback Channel .:j:. - .:j:.Special.Delivery
SCRA|Ivan.Voi - Reports on Nomad Encounters - Chattur'gha
RNC.Amsterdam - Profil und shiplogs - Frank Gotz
]M[Zeus - ]M[ Faction Idea ]M[ - ]M[Erebus

Current status: Over-active again (I'm hooked) | X-Fire | Last.FM | Mail & MSN | Remember: IP Banhammered without a fair trail - Term 1.6 ignored.
  Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Always a bigger fish? - by Kazyumi - 01-10-2008, 05:42 PM
Always a bigger fish? - by Jinx - 01-10-2008, 05:50 PM
Always a bigger fish? - by RingoW - 01-10-2008, 05:59 PM
Always a bigger fish? - by pipsqueak - 01-10-2008, 06:47 PM
Always a bigger fish? - by kiggles - 01-10-2008, 07:00 PM
Always a bigger fish? - by Kazyumi - 01-10-2008, 07:04 PM
Always a bigger fish? - by El Nino - 01-11-2008, 07:50 PM
Always a bigger fish? - by chopper - 01-12-2008, 04:37 AM
Always a bigger fish? - by Panzer - 01-12-2008, 02:05 PM
Always a bigger fish? - by kiggles - 01-12-2008, 03:38 PM
Always a bigger fish? - by RickJames - 01-12-2008, 04:08 PM
Always a bigger fish? - by RickJames - 01-12-2008, 06:01 PM
Always a bigger fish? - by X-Lancer - 01-12-2008, 09:30 PM
Always a bigger fish? - by chopper - 01-13-2008, 01:14 AM
Always a bigger fish? - by globalplayer-svk - 01-13-2008, 01:24 AM
Always a bigger fish? - by Kazyumi - 01-13-2008, 01:29 AM
Always a bigger fish? - by amigo7 - 01-13-2008, 05:07 AM
Always a bigger fish? - by chopper - 01-13-2008, 11:56 AM
Always a bigger fish? - by Ryan Hanson - 01-26-2008, 02:00 AM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode