Rule question for Hawk

[Pancakes]

Some clarification for people posting

1) ID is rules. ID does not prohibit it.

2) It has happened before. Typical response is for the target to strip the attacker's hunting privileges in their house space.

3) BHG| clan has a policy against it because they want to get paid by all of the houses.

Pretty much what Ursus said, is why I'm asking, considering how the comment was phrased by Hawk.

There has been official role-play notice made (by me as faction leader) that we of the BHG chose NOT to get involved in house wars, and our members (which means indies) need to follow that. Going after Gallia is perfectly acceptable to us. So I just want clarification that Hawk meant his wording because it's our policy, or (and this is because it was part of a sanction notice) if that's the way they're interpreting the rules now.

See the difference there? I know as part of the sanction that rule 6.9 was applied, I just want to make sure that I'm reading this correctly is all.

I think that the BHG| could enforce 4.7 in a case of BHG indies shooting house lawfuls since it's well against BHG RP to be doing that. BHG is a guild with hierarchy and they managed to get so widely spread and big due to the fact they work with all lawfuls against unlawfuls only. No one would let some merc company that might switch side any day to build station and be highly active within their border, if anyone wish to play the semi-lawful mercenary he's welcome to go ahead and pick the freelancer ID.

---

BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD