• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 143 144 145 146 147 … 780 Next »
are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP?

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll: Are spyglass and battleship scanners oorp on fighters, freighters and small transports?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
yes
56.67%
34 56.67%
no
43.33%
26 43.33%
Total 60 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP?
Offline Hidamari
01-12-2014, 12:36 PM, (This post was last modified: 01-12-2014, 12:43 PM by Hidamari.)
#19
Member
Posts: 2,100
Threads: 217
Joined: Jul 2009

(01-12-2014, 01:37 AM)Saronsen Wrote: Game mechanics, you'd cause more trouble making a rule YOU CANT USE BATTLESHIP SCANNERS than just leaving it as is.

Same reason Zoner battleships haven't been deleted yet.
Yea, was more about limiting ourselves rather than saying nobody should be allowed though.

(01-12-2014, 02:00 AM)SummerMcLovin Wrote: Either of them on a small ship doesn't make a lot of sense, but it's fine for now. Might be ooRP, but not in a harmful way: you could say the same about "experimental and unique" codenames numbering the thousands in our version of the world.

I was going to post saying "wait for Kaz to make people squirm by mentioning his coding about it" but seems he's not went for it. I don't know if there actually are going to be limited to battleships or not.

The enlarged parts are bits I am affraid of really. I do not want to end up with three dozen worthless scanners however many months down the line because of sudden changes to this system making A LOT of grinding made instantly redundant.

Some admin green or dev amber would be appreciated on that topic.

(01-12-2014, 02:11 AM)teschy Wrote: Well honestly I don't care about their price.. or stats, but at least rename it from Battleship Scanner to something that doesn't include the keyword 'Battleship' in it.
(01-12-2014, 02:24 AM)Safe Haven Wrote: Does it really matter?
It does, but not so much that I want to take peoples toys away.


(01-12-2014, 10:02 AM)Ponge Wrote: I think it is quite ooRP to have a scanner of that size on other ships than cruisers and battleships, and the infocard also supports that.

Suggestion
Limit the BS/Spyglass only to cruisers and battleships, and create a specialized scanner for ONLY light fighters, like 20k scan range, 2k cargo scan range, so people can make long range scout/interceptor crafts, giving a new boost to LF use.

well that was the idea behind this, I was wanting 75th to get a upgrade to help them be better scouts, but there is sort of red tape and 3.5 billion credits standing in the way. lol

(01-12-2014, 10:47 AM)Jack_Henderson Wrote: Spazzy got it right.
These scanners are the first real money sink after CAU armor.

Quote:Or create a specialized scanner for fighters, like 20k scan range, 2k cargo scan range, so people can make long range scout/interceptor crafts.

Ye. Snub variations should exist. Also extremely expensive, to be money sinks.


there seems to be a split on this issue. though like teschy/vulk said if the infocard was changed and the word 'battleship' removed, that would be good enough for me, and if the spyglass scanner is made by HF and not lane hackers then there is little chance OC would have them anyway..

[Image: RKaqSve.png]
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by Hidamari - 01-12-2014, 01:06 AM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by Omega472 - 01-12-2014, 01:34 AM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by Vulkhard Muller - 01-12-2014, 01:36 AM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by tothebonezone - 01-12-2014, 01:37 AM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by Valrin - 01-12-2014, 01:37 AM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by ProwlerPC - 01-12-2014, 01:44 AM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by Kazinsal - 01-12-2014, 01:45 AM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by SummerMcLovin - 01-12-2014, 02:00 AM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by Kazinsal - 01-12-2014, 02:11 AM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by teschy - 01-12-2014, 02:11 AM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by Reid - 01-12-2014, 02:24 AM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by teschy - 01-12-2014, 02:30 AM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by Omi - 01-12-2014, 02:41 AM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by sindroms - 01-12-2014, 02:32 AM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by Binski - 01-12-2014, 02:41 AM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by sindroms - 01-12-2014, 02:46 AM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by Ponge - 01-12-2014, 10:02 AM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by Jack_Henderson - 01-12-2014, 10:47 AM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by Hidamari - 01-12-2014, 12:36 PM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by Kazinsal - 01-13-2014, 12:31 AM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by Jack_Henderson - 01-13-2014, 12:56 AM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by Reid - 01-13-2014, 01:46 AM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by aakopa - 01-13-2014, 07:47 PM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by Omi - 01-13-2014, 11:11 PM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by Pavel - 01-12-2014, 12:46 PM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by lIceColon - 01-12-2014, 12:59 PM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by Omicron - 01-12-2014, 01:17 PM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by ProwlerPC - 01-12-2014, 08:03 PM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by Hidamari - 01-13-2014, 12:02 AM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by McNeo - 01-13-2014, 12:23 AM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by Hidamari - 01-13-2014, 12:58 AM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by McNeo - 01-13-2014, 02:27 AM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by Govedo13 - 01-13-2014, 12:40 AM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by sindroms - 01-13-2014, 01:21 AM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by Thargoid - 01-13-2014, 02:55 AM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by ProwlerPC - 01-13-2014, 07:18 PM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by Venkman - 01-13-2014, 08:05 PM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by Thargoid - 01-13-2014, 09:44 PM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by Thexare - 01-13-2014, 11:03 PM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by Thargoid - 01-13-2014, 11:09 PM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by Kazinsal - 01-13-2014, 11:11 PM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by tothebonezone - 01-13-2014, 11:17 PM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by Omi - 01-13-2014, 11:25 PM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by Savas - 01-13-2014, 11:19 PM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by Kazinsal - 01-13-2014, 11:26 PM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by Thargoid - 01-13-2014, 11:44 PM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by Kazinsal - 01-13-2014, 11:53 PM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by Jinx - 01-13-2014, 11:38 PM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by Omi - 01-13-2014, 11:39 PM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by Thargoid - 01-13-2014, 11:51 PM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by Narcotic - 01-14-2014, 12:09 AM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by Thexare - 01-14-2014, 12:21 AM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by Hidamari - 01-14-2014, 01:25 AM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by Kosa - 01-15-2014, 02:01 PM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by Thargoid - 01-15-2014, 03:26 PM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by Jack_Henderson - 01-15-2014, 04:03 PM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by Govedo13 - 01-15-2014, 08:54 PM
RE: are fighters with spyglass/battleship scanners OORP? - by lIceColon - 01-16-2014, 07:34 AM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode