Docking ring weaponry

Hi there Guest,

Existing user? Create account

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll: Docking ring weaponry input You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Keep as is	37.50%	48	37.50%
Replace with mortars	10.94%	14	10.94%
Replace with other guns (cerbs/pulses/flaks/etc)	11.72%	15	11.72%
Remove all docking ring weaponry	35.94%	46	35.94%
Other (Please specify)	3.91%	5	3.91%
Total		128 vote(s)	100%

* You voted for this item.

[Show Results]

Docking ring weaponry

Laura C.

02-29-2016, 10:03 AM, (This post was last modified: 02-29-2016, 10:16 AM by Laura C..)

#79

Member

Posts: 1,444
Threads: 51
Joined: Dec 2011

(02-29-2016, 09:47 AM)Lythrilux Wrote:
(02-29-2016, 09:40 AM)Laura C. Wrote:
(02-29-2016, 09:36 AM)Lythrilux Wrote: It at least solves the problem for planets that don't have POBs in their orbit, and it still contributes to toning down the defences as a whole.
As far as I understood, this thread is only about capital planets docking rings

How is my statement not relevant to that? It all relates to planetary defences.

(02-29-2016, 09:40 AM)Laura C. Wrote: As far as I understood, this thread is ONLY about CAPITAL planets docking rings

(02-29-2016, 09:47 AM)Lythrilux Wrote:
(02-29-2016, 09:40 AM)Laura C. Wrote: So we are talking here about five planets, from which three have POBs on their orbit already. And I swear I will build protecting POB on New Berlin´s orbit myself if I will see it necessary just to even the situation with other capital from non-dead houses.

So yes, it will solve nothing.

Removed planetary defences = more incentive for unlawfuls to raid = more activity = Rheinland not being a dead house. I'm sure Wesker would agree. Making a PoB out of jealously with the purpose of deterring interactions is kind of sad and detrimental to server gameplay ngl.

Great, so first logical source of activity like interhouse war was killed, and now we are going to save it with means against RP logic under "we need to promote interaction" crusade flag. How great way of solving stuff this is. Maybe we should move some Hessian base right on New Berlin´s orbit and all activity problems will be solved then.

(02-29-2016, 09:52 AM)Kaghuros Wrote: There are many reasons as to why Rheinland is a low-activity house, and the missiles around New Berlin are absolutely not one of them. Look more at faction IDs, theme, and war status, and then recall that Rheinland was also populated during a time when docking ring missiles still existed (and a war was on).

This summed it pretty well, +1 man.

Edit:

(02-29-2016, 09:47 AM)Lythrilux Wrote: Removed planetary defences = more incentive for unlawfuls to raid = more activity = Rheinland not being a dead house. I'm sure Wesker would agree.

If Hessians don´t raid more just because they can´t camp planet New Berlin, then something is wrong with them in my opinion.

Also I can easily turn it around and say:
Removed Omega-54 defences = more incentive for lawfuls to raid = more activity = Rheinland not being a dead house. Would Wesker agree?

On a ragebreak. Or ragequit. Time will tell.