(05-07-2016, 04:16 PM)Croft Wrote: I think for the most part its to make the generic ID's less appealing, even if it is only slightly.
Pretty much this. It's been a running trend since .85, there's no legitimate balance reason for doing so. I'd like to see civ house weaponry get 100% on all the generic IDs. After all, it is civilian weaponry. House or not. Using "pirates aren't civilians" as an excuse not to let them use them is merit enough for nerfing flashpoints rofl.
The disincentivizing measures need to stop. They're annoying more than anything else.
(05-07-2016, 07:10 PM)Hannibal Wrote: why complain about weapons available for a fighter with that id when you should not have a reason to fly a fighter on that id?
I'd like to think there's an actual explanation for this post, but I'm struggling to see it and I read over the thread twice to make sure.
Literally every ID on the server should allow a fighter.
Past that, some people choose their own affiliation charts because X group doesn't represent them well enough. I don't see why an independent pirate should suffer any nerf in a fighter of all things.
Unless you actually have some reason behind this measure or even some reason behind your post I think Traxit called it well enough for what it is.