Okay, Trivjum, you seem to be asking one specific thing over and over again, and claiming to not be receiving an answer, thus, I will do so now. You claim that threatening a POB with it's destruction without it's owners being a part of any RP leading up to it is wrong. You also claim that because the players are new, that they should be given some leeway and allowed a bit of room for their actions. You claim that this is all an unfair approach on the part of the {SR} and that it is wrong. You say all of this but seem to be overlooking the fact that these payers have OBVIOUSLY played long enough to earn the credits to build said POB, to supply said POB, and obviously have enough knowledge of how this game works to have even BUILT said POB.
Well, they did so in an area who's inhabitants do not like it, a group friendly to said group decided to take actions against such a blatant offense and thus have issued a deceleration of attack. This is all done perfectly well, and I'm sure, knowing the two parties involved, that they went about this properly and with PROPER RP.
So there you have it, they pitched their tent on someones front lawn, the home owner didn't like it and neither did their friend, so their friend is gunna kick it down and throw it out into the street. This is called RP.
As for my comments on nOmnomnOm, I stick by them, but what is said in NO WAY reflects that of the {SR} because as I said i my first post, I am NOT a part of the faction any longer.