PvP Rules regarding winners

[tfmachad]

This ends up boiling down to "common sense" (for future reference, this is a concept I don't believe in).

If a pirate dies in NY by the hands of a Navy character and then decides to continue pirating in, let's say, Colorado, I'd say that he's borderline to breaking the rules. Not the letter of them, of course, but the spirit of them (perhaps?).

I remember when the last discussion about the the "re-engagement" rule was up, me and some other people suggested that the term "interact" be implied, because this rule has its standpoint in the fact that considering this is an RP server, when someone "dies" it should at least "feel" like their dead.

The pirate that nows disrupts trade in Colorado is breaching the spirit of the rule which is portraying his death (or ain't this the purpose of this rule?), even though he's clear if you consider the rules by their letter alone. The Navy character is bound by his role to go there and take care of the "dead" pirate again.

The player who's playing the Navy character using this as an excuse to PvP more is another issue. One that would be a senseless one if the pirate hadn't failed to portray his death in the first place.

---

Meet the Kriegers - The story of a family and of two men that shared more than just a name
Fantasmas de la Nube Siniestra
I Mon'Star: The Strange Case of Elizabeth Wallace