Do people feel comfortable using the content request system?

[Enkidu]

As to talking about your requests in a public forum, that is entirely different from the dialog that makes a decision. It is also obvious that you know that fact in your dialog, so your statement can only be concluded to be intentionally disingenuous.

I have to wonder, with the amount of effort you are putting into this, are you acting on their behalf or about to resume being part of the team?

I'm curious as to why people don't use the request system more. @"Ironblood" put it quite well. That's why I made this thread. It gets the results that people want to see in discussion threads.

If people did it more they would have fewer reasons to view the system as frustrating and intransparent, as the system would be more transparent.

Full disclosure.

I'm a community contributor. Effectively, I'm a normal member. I'm in an unrelated capacity a 1ic, but I got there the same way any other 1ic did; running an OFL group. I do limited Infocard development work, but I am not a developer. My submissions are edited by the devs.

As a member, I submit content to the devs for editorialisation, rejection, or implementation. Anybody can do this. I use the same systems you can use, and anybody else can.

Because of that, I'm wondering why people arn't submitting content requests more frequently. It does make changes. Are people uncomfortable using the system? Basically a discussion thread is a great place to get the community's idea for a change, but it's more effective if it's backed up with a change request.

---

THE SYNDIC LEAGUES
(A co-operative of Rheinland's outlawed trade unions, determined to take the underworld for themselves.)

Information | Recruitment | Message Dump |
Feedback | Diplomatic channel

(Links pending redevelopment).