• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 11 12 13 14 15 … 547 Next »
Rule change proposition

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll: Should the rule me modified?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes
2.17%
1 2.17%
No
97.83%
45 97.83%
Total 46 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Rule change proposition
Offline Binski
10-07-2020, 05:53 AM,
#22
Member
Posts: 1,531
Threads: 96
Joined: Jun 2013

Uh yeah except with how strong transports are, how often they use RP to distract while trying to get away, its just a needless buffer. Sometimes you'll have no chance of actually getting a ship unless you try to do as much damage as you can when their drop out of cruise.

If the other ship has nothing to reply over, why the need to wait? Most ID's have to wait for a reply to a demand, only more serious ID's give you the ability to directly engage other ships. If you are playing one of those ID's, RP with your opponents is potentially limited anyways. Since its an rp server when convenient, and a pvp server when convenient, it does seem like a little extra protection. Oh the amount of times I've had people get away beecause of 'roleplaying'.

If you want to feel safe, stick to the tradelanes, get a cloak disruptor. If you take a risky route, you may wind up in trouble! Again with how close dock points are, nothing like knowing they got away because of the need to hesitate for no reason. The interaction goes as expected for such opposing ID's, rp is limited and not friendly. You can still get plenty of mutual RP in from other situations, and so can they. I didn't vote on the suggestion in OP, would prefer it say instead, 'Attacking without roleplay. Players must be given reasonable time for a reply to roleplay if there is a demand made upon them'. That means when you can engage a ship as a combat target, drop your two lines, and attack, afk traders will suffer.
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Rule change proposition - by Username removed - 10-06-2020, 08:21 PM
RE: Rule change proposition - by WizardLizard - 10-06-2020, 08:28 PM
RE: Rule change proposition - by darkwind - 10-06-2020, 08:31 PM
RE: Rule change proposition - by Username removed - 10-06-2020, 08:36 PM
RE: Rule change proposition - by MasterL410 - 10-06-2020, 08:40 PM
RE: Rule change proposition - by Lemon - 10-06-2020, 08:47 PM
RE: Rule change proposition - by Binski - 10-06-2020, 09:21 PM
RE: Rule change proposition - by WizardLizard - 10-06-2020, 09:31 PM
RE: Rule change proposition - by Username removed - 10-06-2020, 09:55 PM
RE: Rule change proposition - by Goliath - 10-06-2020, 10:29 PM
RE: Rule change proposition - by Username removed - 10-06-2020, 10:34 PM
RE: Rule change proposition - by Goliath - 10-06-2020, 10:46 PM
RE: Rule change proposition - by Username removed - 10-06-2020, 10:53 PM
RE: Rule change proposition - by Goliath - 10-06-2020, 11:01 PM
RE: Rule change proposition - by WizardLizard - 10-06-2020, 11:29 PM
RE: Rule change proposition - by WizardLizard - 10-06-2020, 11:31 PM
RE: Rule change proposition - by Username removed - 10-07-2020, 12:39 AM
RE: Rule change proposition - by WizardLizard - 10-07-2020, 12:51 AM
RE: Rule change proposition - by Username removed - 10-07-2020, 01:12 AM
RE: Rule change proposition - by SnakThree - 10-07-2020, 04:26 AM
RE: Rule change proposition - by Nika - 10-07-2020, 05:34 AM
RE: Rule change proposition - by Binski - 10-07-2020, 05:53 AM
RE: Rule change proposition - by Nika - 10-07-2020, 06:48 AM
RE: Rule change proposition - by Binski - 10-07-2020, 07:18 AM
RE: Rule change proposition - by Nika - 10-07-2020, 07:32 AM
RE: Rule change proposition - by darkwind - 10-07-2020, 07:19 AM
RE: Rule change proposition - by Binski - 10-07-2020, 07:37 AM
RE: Rule change proposition - by Gardarik - 10-07-2020, 07:42 AM
RE: Rule change proposition - by Goliath - 10-07-2020, 10:49 AM
RE: Rule change proposition - by Lumik - 10-07-2020, 11:09 AM
RE: Rule change proposition - by Binski - 10-07-2020, 08:34 PM
RE: Rule change proposition - by Thexare - 10-07-2020, 11:51 AM
RE: Rule change proposition - by SnakThree - 10-07-2020, 03:55 PM
RE: Rule change proposition - by Dark.Star - 10-07-2020, 07:24 AM
RE: Rule change proposition - by Dark.Star - 10-07-2020, 07:45 AM
RE: Rule change proposition - by ONIKS - 10-07-2020, 09:52 AM
RE: Rule change proposition - by Groshyr - 10-07-2020, 11:22 AM
RE: Rule change proposition - by Username removed - 10-07-2020, 12:47 PM
RE: Rule change proposition - by Toaster - 10-07-2020, 01:59 PM
RE: Rule change proposition - by Goliath - 10-07-2020, 03:12 PM
RE: Rule change proposition - by WizardLizard - 10-07-2020, 03:38 PM
RE: Rule change proposition - by darkwind - 10-07-2020, 07:24 PM
RE: Rule change proposition - by JCPC - 10-07-2020, 07:54 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode