• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General News and Announcements
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 46 Next »
ID-locking IFFs and undercover systems

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

ID-locking IFFs and undercover systems
Offline Karst
01-31-2025, 11:12 AM,
#19
Chariot of Light
Posts: 3,023
Threads: 218
Joined: Sep 2009

It occurs to me that there's a very simple and elegant solution to preempt any issues with ID/IFF shenanigans going "too deep", because it has occurred to me that treating other players purely on IFF might lead to stuff like LSF IFF'd Freelancers having to be allowed into Zone-21:

- Players must treat others according to their IFF
- Players cannot determine another players true ID, unless their ID or nongeneric IFF matches their own

That means, my GC IFF Freelancer is to anyone else a Golden Chrysanthemum, except to actual GC, who would know she isn't a member.
The LSF IFF Freelancer can be checked by real LSF.
And conversely, a Freelancer IFF BDM cannot be identified except by the BDM themselves.

I don't really see an issue with undercover intels otherwise being undetectable. This is effectively already the case with Freelancers: A Freelancer could be working for anyone and there's no mechanic that would determine that. Powergaming rules already exist to prevent people from doing anything too wacky in the intel world, this ID/IFF stuff wouldn't really change that.
Undercover intel activity has its associated downsides anyway, like not necessarily being able to assert your authority, or being targeted by enemies of your cover identity. It's a give and take.

[Image: jWv1kDa.png]
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
ID-locking IFFs and undercover systems - by jammi - 01-31-2025, 01:29 AM
RE: ID-locking IFFs and undercover systems - by A Magpie - 01-31-2025, 01:51 AM
RE: ID-locking IFFs and undercover systems - by Karst - 01-31-2025, 07:33 AM
RE: ID-locking IFFs and undercover systems - by Cherry Blossom - 01-31-2025, 02:14 AM
RE: ID-locking IFFs and undercover systems - by Sombs - 01-31-2025, 02:33 AM
RE: ID-locking IFFs and undercover systems - by TheSauron - 01-31-2025, 03:03 AM
RE: ID-locking IFFs and undercover systems - by BobMacaroni - 01-31-2025, 04:21 AM
RE: ID-locking IFFs and undercover systems - by The_Godslayer - 01-31-2025, 04:42 AM
RE: ID-locking IFFs and undercover systems - by TheKusari - 01-31-2025, 06:15 AM
RE: ID-locking IFFs and undercover systems - by The_Godslayer - 01-31-2025, 06:25 AM
RE: ID-locking IFFs and undercover systems - by Semir Gerkhan - 01-31-2025, 08:27 AM
RE: ID-locking IFFs and undercover systems - by Kauket - 01-31-2025, 08:41 AM
RE: ID-locking IFFs and undercover systems - by jammi - 01-31-2025, 09:23 AM
RE: ID-locking IFFs and undercover systems - by Karst - 01-31-2025, 10:20 AM
RE: ID-locking IFFs and undercover systems - by Semir Gerkhan - 01-31-2025, 10:44 AM
RE: ID-locking IFFs and undercover systems - by Deterrence Research Command - 01-31-2025, 09:46 AM
RE: ID-locking IFFs and undercover systems - by Goliath - 01-31-2025, 10:54 AM
RE: ID-locking IFFs and undercover systems - by Kauket - 01-31-2025, 11:49 AM
RE: ID-locking IFFs and undercover systems - by Lythrilux - 01-31-2025, 11:53 AM
RE: ID-locking IFFs and undercover systems - by StellarViss - 01-31-2025, 11:59 AM
RE: ID-locking IFFs and undercover systems - by Kauket - 01-31-2025, 12:02 PM
RE: ID-locking IFFs and undercover systems - by Toaster - 01-31-2025, 11:06 AM
RE: ID-locking IFFs and undercover systems - by StellarViss - 01-31-2025, 11:42 AM
RE: ID-locking IFFs and undercover systems - by Karst - 01-31-2025, 11:12 AM
RE: ID-locking IFFs and undercover systems - by Semir Gerkhan - 01-31-2025, 11:26 AM
RE: ID-locking IFFs and undercover systems - by Lythrilux - 01-31-2025, 11:33 AM
RE: ID-locking IFFs and undercover systems - by Big Bison Bessie - 01-31-2025, 11:34 AM
RE: ID-locking IFFs and undercover systems - by Lythrilux - 01-31-2025, 11:46 AM
RE: ID-locking IFFs and undercover systems - by Semir Gerkhan - 01-31-2025, 12:11 PM
RE: ID-locking IFFs and undercover systems - by StellarViss - 01-31-2025, 11:51 AM
RE: ID-locking IFFs and undercover systems - by jammi - 01-31-2025, 11:53 AM
RE: ID-locking IFFs and undercover systems - by StellarViss - 01-31-2025, 11:56 AM
RE: ID-locking IFFs and undercover systems - by Barrier - 01-31-2025, 01:44 PM
RE: ID-locking IFFs and undercover systems - by Proselyte - 01-31-2025, 05:14 PM
RE: ID-locking IFFs and undercover systems - by The_Godslayer - 01-31-2025, 05:59 PM
RE: ID-locking IFFs and undercover systems - by Oggdo Bogdo - 01-31-2025, 06:05 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode