Battleships- a solution

[n00bl3t]

I'm sure you are aware that I could return half of it back to you, though I'll spare us that little infinite loop.
Actually I don't want to get you "under my banner". Instead I would prefer a majority decision without leading someone to the conclusion all independents would be strictly against factions and for sure be lolwutters.

Besides I just told you how your statements read for me, no need to start flaming.

No. You could not. Bring it. Let us see how far it goes. (No, it will not be infinite.)

Your "majority" does not include all players on the server, simply forumites.

If you do not want me under your banner, and I most certainly do not want you under mine, since you are in my eyes a "dependent independent", then stop trying to make me do this and that for your version of capital ship role-play.

Here comes the big bad real life comparison: If you are living in a country with a democratic government, then there will be elections every now and then. If you don't use your rights and actually really vote for someone you shouldn't complain afterwards if they won't do the job like you would like them to. You screwed up yourself, you and all the others who didn't care about. You might have done something to prevent it, but you didn't.

This part is obviously not about you, but about those who don't care.
I don't have that much time either. But if you are going for a battleship you will have to trade a lot anyways to get it. Why not write your request first and then trade for it while it's getting reviewed? And if it gets rejected you can always talk to the people and ask them how to improve your rp. But if you really think it's based on a personal grudge: carry it on to the admins, I'm sure they can help you.

I think we already agreed that there are problematic players in every type of ship. But the point is they are easier to get back in line if they are in something small than if they are in a big ship and you only in a small fighter trying to tell them what they are doing wrong. We just had a nice example in the other Thread when someone stated that he's a Fleet Admiral now because he has a LABC and wouldn't need to answer to anyone in a smaller vessel. I won't call the name, but I'm sure it's obvious who I'm talking about.

RL is not FL. Furthermore, playing the forums is not mandatory.

Why should I write a request when I can already RP?

No. It has been acknowledged that whenever a "problem capital" is seen a "lolbomber anti-capwhoring" fleet engages it, furthermore the big capitals are the usually the first to go down in combat. Let us ignore the fact that the bomber and the fighter usually outlast everything there and can usually get more kills as well.

If he wants to RP a Fleet Admiral what is the problem? (If he orders you around, feel free to RP that you come under a different command, but just understand that ordering him around may result in him telling you he is under a different command.)

---

Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.