Questions on the latest "Administrator Notice"

[n00bl3t]

There should be some restriction to what can a faction ask in return from you. Perhaps you would have to wear a tag, LH-i (lane hacker indy), some kind of roleplaying test, one should not be allowed to demand money from indies to buy it. Perhaps requiring indies to bring in resources hull panells and such to construct it, might be required. One can get very creative with that and I think it is in our best intrest to limit cap ships.

Nothing is more tiresome than a destroyer cruising up to your behind and start blasting, one could be out all day reporting the mute engagements and play very little,... and after all would be sorted, capwhores would come in with "Engaging Santa" and after that they would even be void of sanctions, without a noticable increase in roleplay quality.

There should be a test, wich factions would then enforce, to possible future owners of capital ships.

The fact is, factions have demanded money from independents to fly their ships, which highlights the abuse that can occur as a result of your proposed system. Even if the rule of not demanding credits was put in, cronyism and personal attitudes can come into it (And most probably, they will.)

As for the Destroyer you mention, there is a sanction forum. Hit the SS button, upload the SS and post a thread. If no sanction is delivered, the person was not breaking the rules. (As it has already been said, "engaging santa" is not enough and will get the offending person sanctioned.)

*Sighs.*

---

Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.