Carriers fullfilling the wrong role.

[Tenacity]

You really need to calm down. I'm making observations based on my own information and commenting on them as I see fit. There is no need to insult me.

This topic comes up every couple of months, and it's always the same thing. "Nerf carriers, they should be using fighters/bombers and not guns!" vs "Guess what, we dont have fighters and bombers all the time, stfu"

Honestly, it's extremely frustrating to have to come in here and defend my ship from nerfs every time someone comes along with an unoriginal idea and wants to change things. Dont fix what isnt broken.


Name aside, the carriers in this game are all properly balanced. The Order LAC is balanced as a heavy battlecruiser - below battleships but above the other BC's. The Liberty Carrier is balanced as a heavy battleship. The Zoner/IMG Carrier is balanced as a Light Battleship.

These ships are -fine-, they've been tried and tested, stop trying to change them.

When you can come to me with an argument other than "But it's called a carrier!" as to why these ships should be changed, then I'll consider your point of view. But until then you're trying to use nothing more than a word to justify destroying three perfectly good ships on the server.

---