• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 483 484 485 486 487 … 779 Next »
Non combat vessels in combat situations

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard
Kusari Super Alloy Shipments - 1,953,850 / 2,500,000
LSF Arms Shipments - 205,090 / 2,000,000
LSF Munition Shipments - 164,031 / 2,000,000
Pirate Black Market Shipments - 597,370 / 1,000,000
Dragon Bounties - 16 / 10,000
KOI Bounties - 52 / 10,000
LSF Bounties - 37 / 10,000
Samura Bounties - 5 / 10,000

Latest activity

Non combat vessels in combat situations
Offline Jinx
10-18-2009, 01:07 PM, (This post was last modified: 10-18-2009, 01:20 PM by Jinx.)
#2
skipasmiður
Posts: 7,685
Threads: 313
Joined: Sep 2007

in the past ( or even in the present ) - there are situations that pvp immune players can still be shot, shot down or intentionally targetted.

for example - when a lvl10 starflier flies into a battlezone where several heavy ships or even capital warships dish out damage. - it is his own fault when he gets shot down. - by flying into a warzone - he became a valid target - as ... and so the argument: - "a civilian would not fly into such a place"

now - if we transfer that to a transport....

a transport being in a warzone should enjoy the same treatment - for one, it is not really likely that a transport has declared someone "hostile" and still sticks around - usually he d be legging it away asap. - if he s still around and even activly assisting the attack of ships that are an actual danger - it is a behaviour that earns himself to become a valid target.

the basis question is - what is a decent and believable behaviour for a transport? - would a transport activly give away tactical informations ( in a way that the hostile player can see it ) - when he is in immanent danger? - it would need to be a very hardened and daring captain for sure.

the other question is - would a warship target the transport that if there are more dangerous ships around? - probably not.

when we take the term "non-combat" vessels literally - such vessels try to stay out of combat - and that would include any involvement in combat ( giving away tactical informations, taunts - etc. )


* the difference between the two incidents is - one can be considered an accident, the other an intentional kill. - however...

there were also admins that stated that - if a starflier got too annoying - one could accidently drop a mine - which happens to seek out a random target ( which by coincidence might be the starflier ) and blows it up. - while not official - still stated as an alternative.

now the problem is - it is a kill, it is intentional - and the player killed was protected by the rules in an ooRP way ( much like transports are protected from capital warships, which has nothing to do with RP and all with ooRP )

the real difference is a fine line - and much up to interpretation. in my opinion - a transport that is activly assisting other players to score a blue message is de facto involved in pvp - and should these other ships drain my shields by 50% - ( no ... i d not fire on the transport, cause i know its not allowed ) but i d get really really angry about the silly rules.

** the above does not describe how recent events happened, but only a hypothetical event, cause only those that were involved know how it really happened, and i dare say - even the ones involved have a somewhat twisted point of view.

[Image: just_a_signature_by_sjrarj-d63yjsx.png]
Shipdesigns made for DiscoveryGC
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Non combat vessels in combat situations - by 11of10 - 10-18-2009, 12:52 PM
Non combat vessels in combat situations - by Jinx - 10-18-2009, 01:07 PM
Non combat vessels in combat situations - by jimmy Patterson - 10-18-2009, 02:10 PM
Non combat vessels in combat situations - by Athenian - 10-18-2009, 02:17 PM
Non combat vessels in combat situations - by Colonel.Tigh - 10-18-2009, 02:23 PM
Non combat vessels in combat situations - by jimmy Patterson - 10-18-2009, 02:26 PM
Non combat vessels in combat situations - by Athenian - 10-18-2009, 02:31 PM
Non combat vessels in combat situations - by jimmy Patterson - 10-18-2009, 02:56 PM
Non combat vessels in combat situations - by Colonel.Tigh - 10-18-2009, 02:58 PM
Non combat vessels in combat situations - by Athenian - 10-18-2009, 03:03 PM
Non combat vessels in combat situations - by Exsiled_one - 10-18-2009, 04:09 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode