He hasn't had a trial yet, nor has he actually been sentenced, nor has he done any kind of plea bargain.
So you're just as guilty of sensationalizing this as the paper is.
Remember, the other guy faced up LIFE in prison before his trial and subsequent conviction. (He couldn't have faced the death penalty because he was in Illinois, which doesn't HAVE a death penalty. If he'd done that in Indiana, he could have faced DEATH.)
Also, state crime - only two charges - versus federal crime with multiple (50 counts). So gee, they find the first guy guilty on all 50 counts - he gets 2 years each - and serves them all concurrently. So did he get 100 years? Technically - and he's out in 1.
(11-21-2013, 12:53 PM)Jihadjoe Wrote: Oh god... The end of days... Agmen agreed with me.