• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community The Community Real Life Discussion Software & Hardware
« Previous 1 … 8 9 10 11 12 … 91 Next »
Building a new system,Opinions please.

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3 Next »
Building a new system,Opinions please.
Offline Praetor
02-28-2014, 10:20 AM,
#11
Banned
Posts: 374
Threads: 28
Joined: May 2013

Cant afford any RAM better than that.Sad

User was banned for: Compromised account
Time left: (Permanent)
Reply  
Offline Lampyridae
03-01-2014, 09:17 AM, (This post was last modified: 03-01-2014, 09:21 AM by Lampyridae.)
#12
Member
Posts: 26
Threads: 1
Joined: Dec 2008

Unless you have a particular need for two network connections you can drop the separate PCI card as the motherboard has a 10/100/1000 card built in. I would wait with the soundcard as well until you've tried the onboard. It's likely it will be sufficient. I'd be tempted to get an SSD of 60-120GB (depending on what you can afford) for the OS with a 500GB HDD for storage if 1TB isn't required at the moment. Capacity can always be added at a later date. More RAM would be better, but that's dependant on you having a 64-bit OS which you haven't mentioned.
Reply  
Offline Govedo13
03-02-2014, 09:14 AM, (This post was last modified: 03-02-2014, 09:15 AM by Govedo13.)
#13
Member
Posts: 4,663
Threads: 97
Joined: Jul 2009

I see no technical reason to buy this. I mean if you need PC for internet browsing and office packet anything older and significantly cheaper would serve this role.
You have little to no room for improvement towards gaming platform with this basic setup. APUs are meant for office PCs. Even the best APU cannot compare with medium class two years old GPU combined with medium class three years old Intel 4-core CPU.

I mean second hand 2011 Intel CPU: http://ark.intel.com/products/52210/inte...o-3_70-ghz
combined with any LGA1155 second hand Mobo and medicore newer ATI R9 or similar Nvidia GPU chip would allow you to have gaming PC for the same money.

My suggestion before wasting your money dig benchmarks and compare the stuff that I proposed with the stuff that you intend to buy.

€œ
(10-09-2013, 10:51 AM)Knjaz Wrote: Official faction players that are often accused of elitism, never deploy them and have those weird, immersion killing "fair fight/dueling" suicidal hobbies. (yes, i've seen enough of those lolduels, where house military with overwhelming force on the field willingly loses a pilot in a duel. ffs.)

Reply  
Offline aakopa
03-02-2014, 09:19 AM,
#14
Member
Posts: 566
Threads: 7
Joined: Jul 2012

You need graphics card as well for gaming...

[Image: 500px-Bowexsig.jpg]
  Reply  
Offline Praetor
03-02-2014, 09:48 AM,
#15
Banned
Posts: 374
Threads: 28
Joined: May 2013

Iam interested in a 32 bit Windows 7 OS,but will consider 64 bit Win 7 OS too if it can better use resources.

User was banned for: Compromised account
Time left: (Permanent)
Reply  
Offline Luke.
03-02-2014, 10:03 AM,
#16
Server Administrator
Posts: 1,649
Threads: 80
Joined: Mar 2013

1. There's no reason not to get a 64 bit OS
2. Graphics cards are essential for anything outside of normal desktop application usage
3. Intel is better than AMD.
4. Bigger PSU is always better in case you wish to upgrade components in the future. Trust me, you will.

[Image: 4a0e7968-2678-4a66-9449-352a2bb8d72f.png...fit=bounds]
Reply  
Offline Lampyridae
03-02-2014, 10:06 AM,
#17
Member
Posts: 26
Threads: 1
Joined: Dec 2008

64-bit is the way to go for the OS even if just for the reason that it recognises more RAM. What Govedo13 says makes sense with your budget. I converted it to GBP after making my last post; you don't have a lot to play with. Second-hand could give you more for your money.
Reply  
Offline sindroms
03-02-2014, 10:38 AM,
#18
Member
Posts: 9,434
Threads: 985
Joined: Feb 2008

As someone who got a decent enough PC recently, I do suggest second hand. Though try buying through someone you know. If you discover a problem later on, you might want to have bought it from someone you can track down afterwards.

--------------
PSA: If you have been having stutter/FPS lag on Disco where it does not run as smoothly as other games, please look at the fix here: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...pid2306502
----------
Reply  
Offline lIceColon
03-03-2014, 03:52 PM, (This post was last modified: 03-03-2014, 03:56 PM by lIceColon.)
#19
Member
Posts: 878
Threads: 89
Joined: Feb 2013

(03-02-2014, 09:14 AM)Govedo13 Wrote: I see no technical reason to buy this. I mean if you need PC for internet browsing and office packet anything older and significantly cheaper would serve this role.
You have little to no room for improvement towards gaming platform with this basic setup. APUs are meant for office PCs. Even the best APU cannot compare with medium class two years old GPU combined with medium class three years old Intel 4-core CPU.
What he said

(03-02-2014, 10:03 AM)Luke. Wrote: Bigger PSU is always better in case you wish to upgrade components in the future. Trust me, you will.

I've got a 650ti boost +3670 and 2 hdds running on a 580w psu, 99% of my gaming needs are well covered, cryengine stuff runs smoothly at medium-high settings. If you really want that apu then a 400w psu will probably handle it well, just be sure to get a quality one. I'm not sure how expensive power is in india, but I chose intel+niv for its power efficiency - the newer the technology, the more power efficient it will be, so you don't neccesarily have to have a powerful psu especially considering your budget.

also, drop the cpu cooler and the ethernet, completely unneccesary. try to get a 2tb hard drive - less $$ per gb

No atmosphere? GTFO.
The propeller is the greatest invention of all time.
  Reply  
Offline Xenosaga
03-06-2014, 01:50 PM, (This post was last modified: 03-06-2014, 01:51 PM by Xenosaga.)
#20
Member
Posts: 497
Threads: 35
Joined: Oct 2010

Actually, a good 400W PSU will handle almost any regular, sensible gaming system (e.g. a 4570K + Radeon R9 280X) for years to come.
Seriously, people tend to massively overestimate a system's power usage and buy either overpriced PSUs that yield no advantage whatsoever or $25 750W PSUs from ebay which equivalate timebombs. If you do not have any definite plans on going SLI/Crossfire, there's no reason to go over 550W.

Let's put things into perspective: A system consisting of an overclocked Radeon 290X, which is one heck of an inefficient, power-hungry beast plus an overclocked i7 4960X draws 400W from the wall. Of course, although a good 400W PSU will be able to handle it, you want a few reserves. Thus, a good 550W PSU would be more than sufficient, even for a beastly system such as this.
Reply  
Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode