• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 134 135 136 137 138 … 780 Next »
Zoner Lore v1.0

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3 Next »
Zoner Lore v1.0
Offline Zen_Mechanics
03-24-2014, 01:51 PM,
#11
Member
Posts: 2,262
Threads: 196
Joined: Oct 2012

You wanted a lore, so there you have it - what more do you want, popcorn? It may not be good as you want it to be, but its a lore alright. And besides complaining every week on every possible topic, if you dont like the current work - write your own one.

Were fools to make war on our brothers in arms.

Reply  
Offline Moberg
03-24-2014, 02:05 PM,
#12
Member
Posts: 836
Threads: 45
Joined: Jul 2012

To be honest, it's better than nothing. From viewing the document (read: draft) of the Zoner officials and this one I think there has been more effort put into this doc. Certainly, this document still needs improvement. "Then they did this, and suddenly this, and then this and that." It's quite vague without much background given at times.
In addition, the document does not invalidate the change to the Aquilon and Nephilim either. And for the few battleships that might be needed when you modified your document accordingly, there is SRP for that.
So far, this attempt at a working lore is better than what we were provided so far. I would appreciate more input from the rest of the Zoner official factions to improve this document.

Good job so far, keep it up.
Reply  
Offline Echo 7-7
03-24-2014, 02:11 PM,
#13
Masterful Modder
Posts: 4,077
Threads: 99
Joined: Sep 2006

It's an alright start, but lacks structure and could use a bit more objectivity. It could use more exploration of cause and effect, and analysis of those situations, than just narrative recounting. In particular, there is little justification for the Zoner expansion (or supposed unification).

Aside; Liberty has since withdrawn from the Treaty of Bethlehem due to the Zoner signatory being identified as a Gallic citizen.

There was a sig here, once.
  Reply  
Offline E.T.
03-24-2014, 06:37 PM, (This post was last modified: 03-24-2014, 06:38 PM by E.T..)
#14
Duvelske
Posts: 46
Threads: 4
Joined: Feb 2014

@Haste:
I know frank, I left a part out for now.. Funny enough you notice it at once.. This will be adressed in some of the further versions.

@ Lordvipex
Well maurice the point is im not going to validate things which where not there.. This was done on purpose, but we will see how it evolves.. Like it was mentioned its v1.0, most comes down to the officials not me..

@ Echo
I know it needs some more work, I only hope Officials will be more active working along on it. Thank you for the imput and i am looking forward to your imput on the next version. Overlooked the Bethlehem stuff you mentioned, so thank you for making that clear.

User was banned for: Duvelske, circumventing ban with alt.
Time left: (Permanent)
Reply  
Offline Kazinsal
03-25-2014, 10:40 AM,
#15
Wizard
Posts: 4,541
Threads: 230
Joined: Sep 2009

(03-24-2014, 04:47 AM)Joggin Wrote:
[Image: ambassadorsoffice.png]

John, I'm sorry man, but I gotta be straight with you here.

If you want to discredit the work Duv's done here, then come up with something better yourself.

Retired, permanently.
Reply  
Offline Thyrzul
03-25-2014, 06:20 PM,
#16
The Council
Posts: 4,684
Threads: 115
Joined: Sep 2011

To me it seems MJ doesn't want to discredit Duv's work, merely stating that Duv did not consult TAZ prior to writing the part about TAZ, thus that part in the current version is not to be taken as canon. The two things are not the same, so there isn't really any need to go hostile against eachother.

[Image: OFPpYpb.png][Image: N1Zf8K4.png][Image: LnLbhul.png]
Reply  
Offline SMGSterlin
03-25-2014, 06:25 PM,
#17
Member
Posts: 2,207
Threads: 81
Joined: Feb 2010

(03-24-2014, 01:18 PM)sindroms Wrote: If Tel Aniv approves of it, there has to be something wrong with it.
Spazzy is just saying what we're all thinking.

In fact, I subconsciously passed a negative judgement on this rewritten lore, solely based on the fact that Tel likes it. Tel-Aviv just has a habit of being associated with things we don't like, so we're conditioned to not like whatever he likes.

[Image: smgsterlin.gif]
Reply  
Offline Omicron
03-25-2014, 06:40 PM,
#18
The Order
Posts: 4,745
Threads: 386
Joined: Nov 2009

My personnal guess is that Duv perhaps did asked TAZ leadership but in th end have not consulted TAZ about the "final" product.

[Image: E9d8RnV.jpg?1]
Reply  
Offline E.T.
03-28-2014, 05:48 PM,
#19
Duvelske
Posts: 46
Threads: 4
Joined: Feb 2014

Done both, but that does not matter omicron. If TAZ leadership wants some changes.. My inbox is there. (or skype)
Working on the next version.. Please keep the topic to comments, so it will stay ontopic.

User was banned for: Duvelske, circumventing ban with alt.
Time left: (Permanent)
Reply  
Offline Zen_Mechanics
03-28-2014, 06:04 PM,
#20
Member
Posts: 2,262
Threads: 196
Joined: Oct 2012

(03-25-2014, 06:25 PM)SMGSterlin Wrote:
(03-24-2014, 01:18 PM)sindroms Wrote: If Tel Aniv approves of it, there has to be something wrong with it.
Spazzy is just saying what we're all thinking.

In fact, I subconsciously passed a negative judgement on this rewritten lore, solely based on the fact that Tel likes it. Tel-Aviv just has a habit of being associated with things we don't like, so we're conditioned to not like whatever he likes.


What makes me different is the fact that I care to things, where you and your "friends" pick sides automatically and reject things that you dont like, I wouldn't trust you to hold a lemonade stand, let alone a single radish - you got that part right. Cheers buddy!

Were fools to make war on our brothers in arms.

Reply  
Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode