You wanted a lore, so there you have it - what more do you want, popcorn? It may not be good as you want it to be, but its a lore alright. And besides complaining every week on every possible topic, if you dont like the current work - write your own one.
To be honest, it's better than nothing. From viewing the document (read: draft) of the Zoner officials and this one I think there has been more effort put into this doc. Certainly, this document still needs improvement. "Then they did this, and suddenly this, and then this and that." It's quite vague without much background given at times.
In addition, the document does not invalidate the change to the Aquilon and Nephilim either. And for the few battleships that might be needed when you modified your document accordingly, there is SRP for that.
So far, this attempt at a working lore is better than what we were provided so far. I would appreciate more input from the rest of the Zoner official factions to improve this document.
It's an alright start, but lacks structure and could use a bit more objectivity. It could use more exploration of cause and effect, and analysis of those situations, than just narrative recounting. In particular, there is little justification for the Zoner expansion (or supposed unification).
Aside; Liberty has since withdrawn from the Treaty of Bethlehem due to the Zoner signatory being identified as a Gallic citizen.
@Haste:
I know frank, I left a part out for now.. Funny enough you notice it at once.. This will be adressed in some of the further versions.
@ Lordvipex
Well maurice the point is im not going to validate things which where not there.. This was done on purpose, but we will see how it evolves.. Like it was mentioned its v1.0, most comes down to the officials not me..
@ Echo
I know it needs some more work, I only hope Officials will be more active working along on it. Thank you for the imput and i am looking forward to your imput on the next version. Overlooked the Bethlehem stuff you mentioned, so thank you for making that clear.
User was banned for: Duvelske, circumventing ban with alt.
Time left: (Permanent)
To me it seems MJ doesn't want to discredit Duv's work, merely stating that Duv did not consult TAZ prior to writing the part about TAZ, thus that part in the current version is not to be taken as canon. The two things are not the same, so there isn't really any need to go hostile against eachother.
(03-24-2014, 01:18 PM)sindroms Wrote: If Tel Aniv approves of it, there has to be something wrong with it.
Spazzy is just saying what we're all thinking.
In fact, I subconsciously passed a negative judgement on this rewritten lore, solely based on the fact that Tel likes it. Tel-Aviv just has a habit of being associated with things we don't like, so we're conditioned to not like whatever he likes.
Done both, but that does not matter omicron. If TAZ leadership wants some changes.. My inbox is there. (or skype)
Working on the next version.. Please keep the topic to comments, so it will stay ontopic.
User was banned for: Duvelske, circumventing ban with alt.
Time left: (Permanent)
(03-24-2014, 01:18 PM)sindroms Wrote: If Tel Aniv approves of it, there has to be something wrong with it.
Spazzy is just saying what we're all thinking.
In fact, I subconsciously passed a negative judgement on this rewritten lore, solely based on the fact that Tel likes it. Tel-Aviv just has a habit of being associated with things we don't like, so we're conditioned to not like whatever he likes.
What makes me different is the fact that I care to things, where you and your "friends" pick sides automatically and reject things that you dont like, I wouldn't trust you to hold a lemonade stand, let alone a single radish - you got that part right. Cheers buddy!