• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 686 687 688 689 690 … 779 Next »
Privateers! The story continues...

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3 Next »
Privateers! The story continues...
Offline bluntpencil2001
01-25-2008, 11:42 PM,
#11
Member
Posts: 5,088
Threads: 66
Joined: May 2007

Right, I've been speaking to Fellow Hoodlum, and it does appear that the QCP are in a sticky situation with their RP and possible reports.

I'm thinking about which I.D to use, and think that for the QCP, based in the Sigmas, they should maybe use Junker I.Ds or generic Pirate. Hopefully less reports come up.

Any ships stationed in Bretonia, though, should keep BAF IDs. So, my bomber will be Junker or Pirate, with BAF tags, whereas my LF will be BAF IDed and tagged. Of course, then we'll have people bitching about being ooRP for flying a BAF ship and we'll get called Junkers in spite of our royal allegiances. Hmm.

Maybe I could test it for a week or two and see what happens?

[Image: sig-9566.jpg]
  Reply  
Offline pchwang
01-26-2008, 03:07 AM,
#12
Member
Posts: 2,463
Threads: 101
Joined: Dec 2006

Well, the thing is blunt, the ID system has some serious limitations.

When I was thinking of what to do with one of my chars after you ignominiously expelled him from the SCRA...:( I realized that I could not really create a character in Disco like him.

It just would not work.

You are not the only person to toy with the "privateer." I tried to establish it in Liberty with the Liberty Revenue Cutter Corp, but could not find a justification for it.

But, good luck with everything.

Quote:[7:42:05 PM][6:51:36 PM] Igor (Smokey): btw terry
[6:51:48 PM] Terrance Cooper: Ye?
[6:52:00 PM] Igor (Smokey): nothin
[6:52:03 PM] Igor (Smokey): just sayin btw
[6:52:05 PM] Terrance Cooper: <_<
Quote:Johnny_Haas: you shot anti criuse speed rockets!!!
Johnny_Haas: but why????
Johnny_Haas: ??
Johnny_Haas: why you shoot criuse speed rockets?
  Reply  
Offline Unseelie
01-26-2008, 03:11 AM,
#13
Member
Posts: 4,256
Threads: 235
Joined: Nov 2006

My opinion, is that we need Privateer Ids.
yup.
Quote:Owner of the Bretonian Privateer ID can demand funds or cargo only from forces aiding and/or abetting the enemies of the Crown

Or some such.

Reply  
Offline pchwang
01-26-2008, 03:12 AM,
#14
Member
Posts: 2,463
Threads: 101
Joined: Dec 2006

I think that we should get a general Privateer ID.

That way, any of the factions could have one.

Quote:[7:42:05 PM][6:51:36 PM] Igor (Smokey): btw terry
[6:51:48 PM] Terrance Cooper: Ye?
[6:52:00 PM] Igor (Smokey): nothin
[6:52:03 PM] Igor (Smokey): just sayin btw
[6:52:05 PM] Terrance Cooper: <_<
Quote:Johnny_Haas: you shot anti criuse speed rockets!!!
Johnny_Haas: but why????
Johnny_Haas: ??
Johnny_Haas: why you shoot criuse speed rockets?
  Reply  
Offline bluntpencil2001
01-26-2008, 03:18 AM,
#15
Member
Posts: 5,088
Threads: 66
Joined: May 2007

A Bretonian Privateer ID would be brilliant, but any sort of Privateer IDs would need to be controlled by the admins, as it is easily open for abuse. That and I'm somewhat selfish and don't want Kusari privateers stealing my thunder...:P



[Image: sig-9566.jpg]
  Reply  
Offline Unseelie
01-26-2008, 03:22 AM,
#16
Member
Posts: 4,256
Threads: 235
Joined: Nov 2006

I think, only the Brets and the Kusari have need of a Privateer ID...though, some of the major companies could use privateers too....hmm....

But, a General Privateer Id rather defeats the point of a privateer as opposed to a pirate.

Reply  
Offline bluntpencil2001
01-26-2008, 03:24 AM,
#17
Member
Posts: 5,088
Threads: 66
Joined: May 2007

' Wrote:I think, only the Brets and the Kusari have need of a Privateer ID...though, some of the major companies could use privateers too....hmm....

But, a General Privateer Id rather defeats the point of a privateer as opposed to a pirate.

Well, I think I'll play the historical precedent card and say 'Look it's a largely British phenomenon!':P

I guess I could see some companies doing it, although I'm not sure which ones. Hmm.

[Image: sig-9566.jpg]
  Reply  
Offline pchwang
01-26-2008, 03:34 AM,
#18
Member
Posts: 2,463
Threads: 101
Joined: Dec 2006

Good point. We do need faction specific Privateer IDs. We also need to give them ship restrictions, e.g.) nothing above a gunboat.

After all, privateers should not be as well funded as the actual armed forces.

As for companies, I think that the Mercenary ID covers their needs. A privateer is really just a citizen fighting on his country's side for spoils of war.

Quote:[7:42:05 PM][6:51:36 PM] Igor (Smokey): btw terry
[6:51:48 PM] Terrance Cooper: Ye?
[6:52:00 PM] Igor (Smokey): nothin
[6:52:03 PM] Igor (Smokey): just sayin btw
[6:52:05 PM] Terrance Cooper: <_<
Quote:Johnny_Haas: you shot anti criuse speed rockets!!!
Johnny_Haas: but why????
Johnny_Haas: ??
Johnny_Haas: why you shoot criuse speed rockets?
  Reply  
Offline bluntpencil2001
01-26-2008, 03:51 AM,
#19
Member
Posts: 5,088
Threads: 66
Joined: May 2007

' Wrote:Good point. We do need faction specific Privateer IDs. We also need to give them ship restrictions, e.g.) nothing above a gunboat.

After all, privateers should not be as well funded as the actual armed forces.

As for companies, I think that the Mercenary ID covers their needs. A privateer is really just a citizen fighting on his country's side for spoils of war.

I'd push for admin-issued, too, actually. And yes, gunboat or smaller is great, although we do have some nice plans for a Royal Liner...

[Image: sig-9566.jpg]
  Reply  
Offline Unseelie
01-26-2008, 04:01 AM,
#20
Member
Posts: 4,256
Threads: 235
Joined: Nov 2006

I do believe the East India Company employed privateers against its dutch and french conterparts, don't see why that would not translate into Sirius wide 'economic competition' between the great multi-system corporations.

Reply  
Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode