• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Welcome Help & Support
« Previous 1 … 141 142 143 144 145 … 496 Next »
What happened to Colonial BC

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (4): « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
What happened to Colonial BC
Offline Lonely_Ghost
06-26-2014, 08:57 PM,
#21
Member
Posts: 1,217
Threads: 48
Joined: Nov 2010

(06-26-2014, 05:29 PM)Jansen Wrote: Nothing wrong here, they are rather rich compared to some other factions, so they should be able to afford things.

Being able to afford, doesn't means they need it, and Im talking about IMG now.

Who are IMG's main enemy- OCs and Sairs. Both of which rely on snubs or minor capital ships like gunboats, according to lore and RP. Doesn't realy make sence for IMG, to have a battlecruiser to counter thouse ships in RP. BC is too much for IMG. Destroyer is ok to counter both gunboats and ocassional cruisers. They would be fine with something like Tresher.
Even Carrier makes sence for IMG, as mobile snub support base.

In fight against other houses... If GMG would use caps in 80 years war, they would probably loose it.

I also think, that BC for IMG kinda too much.
Reply  
Offline Thyrzul
06-26-2014, 09:19 PM, (This post was last modified: 06-26-2014, 09:19 PM by Thyrzul.)
#22
The Council
Posts: 4,684
Threads: 115
Joined: Sep 2011

For what do IMG require a battlecruiser what they can't do in their snubs, gunboats or transports?

[Image: OFPpYpb.png][Image: N1Zf8K4.png][Image: LnLbhul.png]
Reply  
Offline Luke.
06-26-2014, 09:34 PM,
#23
Server Administrator
Posts: 1,777
Threads: 89
Joined: Mar 2013

Not to mention that the main area in which IMG came into conflict, was Tau-23. A system where fights were often initiated around Java which also have Weapon Platforms to aid them.

Source: CL} and IMG| skirmishes.

[Image: 4a0e7968-2678-4a66-9449-352a2bb8d72f.png...fit=bounds]
Reply  
Offline Trogdor
06-27-2014, 09:08 AM,
#24
Member
Posts: 1,236
Threads: 64
Joined: Feb 2009

(06-26-2014, 09:19 PM)Thyrzul Wrote: For what do IMG require a battlecruiser what they can't do in their snubs, gunboats or transports?

And suddenly, it's this thread again, except instead of the Zoner caps being bashed, it's the IMG.

[Image: i4h0ll.gif]
[Image: zonerzonerzoner.gif]
Reply  
Offline Jack_Henderson
06-27-2014, 10:13 AM,
#25
Independent Miners Guild
Posts: 6,103
Threads: 391
Joined: Nov 2010

I love it. All the rage... all the rage... about something that almost never actually has impact in the game. Proper hating needs a little more Qq about bad behaviour in pvp. Add a pinch of gank and cap abuse to the already mentioned java qq... and we might actually get where this thread is moving anyway.

+ IMG| DISCORD: https://discord.gg/TWrGWjp
+ IMG| IS RECRUITING: Click to find out more!
Reply  
Offline Lord Caedus
06-27-2014, 10:28 AM,
#26
Malta's Bane
Posts: 651
Threads: 60
Joined: Jun 2013

Or people could, you know, want to actually voice their opinion on something that they see a problem with, but hey, I guess you're just insecure about the thing they're bringing up, so you have to deflect the question by claiming you're the target of grudges. Nice of you to act like a rational person that's open to actually debating something.

[Image: eHPLi2z.gif]
Reply  
Offline Jack_Henderson
06-27-2014, 10:36 AM,
#27
Independent Miners Guild
Posts: 6,103
Threads: 391
Joined: Nov 2010

no debate needed as there is no issue and it was not even clise to the topic.

+ IMG| DISCORD: https://discord.gg/TWrGWjp
+ IMG| IS RECRUITING: Click to find out more!
Reply  
Offline Mao
06-27-2014, 10:54 AM, (This post was last modified: 06-27-2014, 10:54 AM by Mao.)
#28
Member
Posts: 2,680
Threads: 165
Joined: Aug 2009

(06-27-2014, 10:28 AM)Max Morse Wrote: Or people could, you know, want to actually voice their opinion on something that they see a problem with, but hey, I guess you're just insecure about the thing they're bringing up, so you have to deflect the question by claiming you're the target of grudges. Nice of you to act like a rational person that's open to actually debating something.
He did act like a rational person and explained what's with the BC (see posts above). When people keep coming with arguments and the idea that they know the lore better than the ones that wrote it, then rational doesn't fit anymore.

That silly IMG BC is lame, yet it does its job in defending their assets. They built it because (IN RP) they had the means and the experience. They built it because they can maintain it and because it was cheaper than creating a new type of vessel. It doesn't flood the server, it's bad (stats wise) so there's no problem with it.

If you think the BC doesn't fit in the general story, then do this:
1. Apply for IMG;
2. Raise in ranks;
3. Become leadership of IMG;
4. RP and convince the guild that the BC is not worth the money;
5. Have it removed from the production facilities in the future updates;
6. (OPTIONAL) Have it replaced with something YOU think fits the IMG better.

[Image: ZZ0gBOD.png]
Reply  
Offline Lord Caedus
06-27-2014, 01:45 PM,
#29
Malta's Bane
Posts: 651
Threads: 60
Joined: Jun 2013

Who said I was talking to Jack?

[Image: eHPLi2z.gif]
Reply  
Offline Luke.
06-27-2014, 01:48 PM,
#30
Server Administrator
Posts: 1,777
Threads: 89
Joined: Mar 2013

(06-27-2014, 10:36 AM)Jack_Henderson Wrote: no debate needed as there is no issue and it was not even clise to the topic.

No issues?

Okay, Jack. Lets just ignore the several replies in this thread, made by people that believe it's wrong. It might not be 100% on-topic but it's a logical discussion rather than a flame war, so there's nothing with it being discussed here especially when CR and IMG work(ed) closely together. I'm still not quite sure why Colonials tolerate you so well when it's now blatantly obvious you have ties with GRN but hey, no issues, remember?

[Image: 4a0e7968-2678-4a66-9449-352a2bb8d72f.png...fit=bounds]
Reply  
Pages (4): « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode