• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Rules & Requests Rules
« Previous 1 8 9 10 11 12 … 198 Next »
POBs near mining fields

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll: Should POBs be allowed inside 15k of mining fields?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes, it should be allowed
29.76%
25 29.76%
No, it should not be allowed
70.24%
59 70.24%
Total 84 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Pages (8): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 … 8 Next »
POBs near mining fields
Offline Jack_Henderson
10-19-2016, 08:27 PM, (This post was last modified: 10-19-2016, 08:27 PM by Jack_Henderson.)
#31
Independent Miners Guild
Posts: 6,103
Threads: 391
Joined: Nov 2010

(10-19-2016, 08:20 PM)GamerGirl Wrote: Bases obstructing the lanes/gates? I guess falster is next, obstructing complete rheinland access to bretonia for 2 whole tradelanes. This is abuse of the weapon platforms! At least if the mining wars ever start to exist. Now we just cannot dock there.

You realized that Falster has been moved (by my request) away from the O7 gate and sits not near Aland, an IMG base... ehm... some years ago? Big Grin

I do not know what you are even talking about, but your answers never fail to amuse me. Smile

> You could not dock on Aland anyway (rephacked to no-dock)
> Falster is therefore also nodock to rivalling mining factions.

I only say: 1/79.
And you own the 1 POB that is not inside the rules.

This alone would make a lot of people question their decision.
Not you, of course. Big Grin

Jack
Reply  
Offline GamerGirl
10-19-2016, 08:31 PM, (This post was last modified: 10-19-2016, 08:42 PM by GamerGirl.)
#32
Member
Posts: 121
Threads: 5
Joined: Jun 2013

Even if I own one base, its still according to the old rules. And the best spot to hide in the asteroid field. I could just do the same as you, than just move it next to the middle of the center of omega 7 use the weapon platforms to abuse my base powers like you can do with falster in omega 3. The only difference is that you can almost complete destroy kruger with it, since we are no good with GMG. (ofcourse you are in it and used it in the past against us) While you can just go in the tau's and do whatever you want. I still do not understand how YOU keep complaining, since a lot of other factions have problems to DOCK in systems or complete system areas. But i guess we need garreth again, maybe it is time now to give up our toys jack..
Reply  
Offline Jack_Henderson
10-19-2016, 08:37 PM,
#33
Independent Miners Guild
Posts: 6,103
Threads: 391
Joined: Nov 2010

What... are... you... talking... mate?!

Jack

+ IMG| DISCORD: https://discord.gg/TWrGWjp
+ IMG| IS RECRUITING: Click to find out more!
Reply  
Offline Alley
10-19-2016, 08:47 PM,
#34
Member
Posts: 4,524
Threads: 406
Joined: Jun 2009

(10-19-2016, 08:31 PM)GamerGirl Wrote: Even if I own one base, its still according to the old rules.

Old rules are irrelevant. As it was pointed out by an admin not so long ago, you don't get to chose the rule revision that suits you best.

The admins have been more than kind to wait all this time for you, the last base that is not compliant with the active ruleset, to finally get in line like everyone else did. With the recent new blood in the admin team and likely the other future admins that are to come, you might want to get in line before this last one non-compliant oddity is pushed into compliance by an admin that doesn't like oddities. If that happens they'll chose the new location for you, which might not be exactly where you'd have liked it to be if you got to choose.

Laz Wrote: Alley was right.
Reply  
Offline GamerGirl
10-19-2016, 08:53 PM, (This post was last modified: 10-19-2016, 08:55 PM by GamerGirl.)
#35
Member
Posts: 121
Threads: 5
Joined: Jun 2013

Rules are rules, you cannot change a rule just because you like it. We were permitted core 5 long before this rule:
- Bases located within 15k of mining fields will not be permitted to advance beyond Core 2.

came to exist. SO there is nothing rule wise you could do about it. Also this base is harming no one, except the ones shooting at it. That are usual red hessian capital ships, you can easy pirate in the area if you trigger the shields of the station. So I see no real obstruction for gameplay as well.
Reply  
Offline Venkman
10-19-2016, 08:54 PM,
#36
Fellow Junker
Posts: 3,496
Threads: 222
Joined: Jun 2011

(10-19-2016, 08:53 PM)GamerGirl Wrote: Rules are rules, you cannot change a rule just because you like it. We were permitted core 5 long before this rule:
- Bases located within 15k of mining fields will not be permitted to advance beyond Core 2.

came to exist. SO there is nothing rule wise you could do about it.

Times change and so should your POB location.

User was banned for: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...tid=206147
https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...tid=206210
Time left: (Permanent)
  Reply  
Offline Thyrzul
10-19-2016, 08:54 PM,
#37
The Council
Posts: 4,684
Threads: 115
Joined: Sep 2011


@GamerGirl
Wanna bet? If I were you I wouldn't try baiting the staff this hard, to be honest.

[Image: OFPpYpb.png][Image: N1Zf8K4.png][Image: LnLbhul.png]
Reply  
Offline GamerGirl
10-19-2016, 08:56 PM, (This post was last modified: 10-19-2016, 09:00 PM by GamerGirl.)
#38
Member
Posts: 121
Threads: 5
Joined: Jun 2013

(10-19-2016, 08:54 PM)Venkman Wrote: Times change and so should your POB location.
If it is moved to the open, its just being targeted. And please tell me where should we move it? Where is there more influence for kruger to put it? RP wise there is none. O wait next to the gate to Stuttgart? because it is on the route to sell ores.

Also here:
http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=129952

this was an admin decision. it states:
(05-28-2015, 09:36 PM)Garrett Jax Wrote: The following rule regarding POBs in mining fields will be enforced upon all future POB builds:

Quote:Core Two
- Players are required to post the name, IFF, system and purpose of their base in this subforum prior to becoming Core 2. These posts remain invisible and are only accessible by the server staff.
- Upon posting their existence, base owners will receive, from the admins, a set of 'blueprints' which is required for their upgrade. Blueprints are non transferable and will be absorbed in the upgrade of the base.
- Before a player/faction attacks a Core 2 base (or higher), they must role play either in game or on the forums and provide the link to this RP in the Attack Declaration thread.
- Bases located in mining within 15k of mining fields will not be permitted to advance beyond Core 2.

[color=#33FF00]This will not apply to Player owned bases already above Core 2 that currently lie in mining fields.
End of discussion from my end..
Reply  
Offline Alley
10-19-2016, 08:57 PM,
#39
Member
Posts: 4,524
Threads: 406
Joined: Jun 2009

(10-19-2016, 08:53 PM)GamerGirl Wrote: Rules are rules, you cannot change a rule just because you like it. We were permitted core 5 long before this rule:
- Bases located within 15k of mining fields will not be permitted to advance beyond Core 2.

came to exist. SO there is nothing rule wise you could do about it.

You were permitted Core 5 under the previous ruleset. Your POB is now illegal with the current ruleset. You were offered a free relocation, you are refusing to take it, pretexting you get to be a special snowflake for some reason. You don't.

This base is going to be moved sooner or later. You have no special imaginary immunity to the rules.

Laz Wrote: Alley was right.
Reply  
Offline Venkman
10-19-2016, 08:58 PM,
#40
Fellow Junker
Posts: 3,496
Threads: 222
Joined: Jun 2011

(10-19-2016, 08:56 PM)GamerGirl Wrote:
(10-19-2016, 08:54 PM)Venkman Wrote: Times change and so should your POB location.
If it is moved to the open, its just being targeted. And please tell me where should we move it? Where is there more influence for kruger to put it? RP wise there is none. O wait next to the gate to Stuttgart? because it is on the route to sell ores.

(10-19-2016, 08:57 PM)Alley Wrote:
(10-19-2016, 08:53 PM)GamerGirl Wrote: Rules are rules, you cannot change a rule just because you like it. We were permitted core 5 long before this rule:
- Bases located within 15k of mining fields will not be permitted to advance beyond Core 2.

came to exist. SO there is nothing rule wise you could do about it.

You were permitted Core 5 under the previous ruleset. Your POB is now illegal with the current ruleset. You were offered a free relocation, you are refusing to take it, pretexting you get to be a special snowflake for some reason. You don't.


I guess that you have your answer.

User was banned for: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...tid=206147
https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...tid=206210
Time left: (Permanent)
  Reply  
Pages (8): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 … 8 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode