• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 251 252 253 254 255 … 547 Next »
Rescaling the Kusari Destroyer

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard
Kusari Super Alloy Shipments - 138,950 / 2,000,000
LSF Arms Shipments - 37,450 / 2,000,000
LSF Munition Shipments - 42,030 / 2,000,000
Pirate Black Market Shipments - 62,600 / 1,000,000
Dragon Bounties - 2 / 10,000
KOI Bounties - 11 / 10,000
LSF Bounties - 8 / 10,000
Samura Bounties - 1 / 10,000

Latest activity

Poll: Size
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
No change
24.55%
41 24.55%
x2
56.29%
94 56.29%
x2.5
17.37%
29 17.37%
Other:
1.80%
3 1.80%
Total 167 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Pages (19): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 … 19 Next »
Thread Closed 
Rescaling the Kusari Destroyer
Blighter
05-07-2010, 02:22 PM,
#31
Unregistered
 

' Wrote:The Kusari Destroyer. The infamously small Cruiser that causes a variety of balancing problems. While not terribly imbalanced as it is, this ship is responsible for holding back the entire Cruiser ship class. Any improvements to Cruisers make the Kusari Dessie an uber pwn ship.

I strongly believe it is in the best intrest of this mod to upscale the Kusari Destroyer, it will benefit the entire Cruiser Class by allowing the Mods more working space.

But it's a vanilla ship, you say? We can't edit it you say? Is this a mod or not? Many things from Vanilla have been altered to improve game play. I believe this will also.

These size comparisons are against the Bretonian Dessie, the Kusari Dessie's most common opponent, and common light cruiser, the Liberty Siege Cruiser

Original

x2 upscale

x2.5 upscale

Note that a x3 upscale is far too big of an increase. x2.5 is the max I could achieve while still keeping the ship looking a realistic size.

Please keep comments calm and constructive. Avoid posting inflamitory comments, lets keep this clean, I know it'll be a touchy subject for some.

EDIT:
A size comparison with the Dragon Cruiser, because it is relevant. Size comparison contains x2 and x2.5 scaled Destroyer.
http://img689.imageshack.us/img689/963/dragonc.png


I've flown the thing[color=#33FF33], I've killed with the thing.
I've flown against the thing, I've killed the thing.

Read [color=#FF99FF]this again.

' Wrote:The Kusari Destroyer. The infamously small Cruiser that causes a variety of balancing problems. While not terribly imbalanced as it is, this ship is responsible for holding back the entire Cruiser ship class. Any improvements to Cruisers make the Kusari Dessie an uber pwn ship.

Now [color=#FF99FF]read this.

' Wrote:But it's a vanilla ship, you say? We can't edit it you say? Is this a mod or not? Many things from Vanilla have been altered to improve game play. I believe this will also.



The reasoning above is solid[color=#000000].

And out of sheer curiosity.

Someone present a reason as to why it shouldn't resized when there are no technical limitations preventing that from happening.

A reason that isn't utter trash and doesn't involve pulling things out of rear-ends like that junk I saw about the Sabre.

A reason that can not be reduced to "OLOL IT'S A VANILLA SHIP" either.

Oh wait.

There won't be any.

None that can't be dismissed as personal bias or trashtalk.


[Image: e8tvtl.jpg]
Offline pipboy
05-07-2010, 02:24 PM, (This post was last modified: 05-07-2010, 02:28 PM by pipboy.)
#32
Member
Posts: 1,122
Threads: 19
Joined: May 2007

From what I'm seeing there, the 2x upscale makes the Kusari dessie slightly larger actually.

Moot point, it's not up to me or anyone else not on the dev/balance team. Ashes you touched on this and I agree that if it does get upscaled in size it would also need an upscale in armor and turret arcs. Still I voted no on changing the size, why fix what isn't broken.

Anyone that thinks it's broken, try flying it against other people in destroyers/cruisers. Try flying it against larger caps for that matter.

Ench I know what you can do in the Kusari destroyer. Honestly I don't find that as any kind of proof of it being overpowered. You can kill just about anything in just about any ship. Any ship in game with really good agility can be turned into an epic pwn machine by a pilot like Ench. For us normal people that aren't genetically modified to kick ass, it's a different story.

[Image: harlcopy.png]
 
Offline tansytansey
05-07-2010, 02:25 PM,
#33
Member
Posts: 4,099
Threads: 67
Joined: Aug 2008

' Wrote:Si, checked, i'm right i think.
[Image: brdessie.png]
Nope. The Kusari Dessie still has a smaller side and front profile, their side profiles are almost identicle at x2 scaling.

' Wrote:why fix what isn't broken.
Because it breaks everything around it. The Bret Gunboat, the Dragon Cruiser, practically every other Cruiser. I wouldn't be surprised if every other Cruiser in this game was balanced around the Kusari Dessie.

Why treat the symptoms when you can treat the cause it's self?

I never said the Kusari Dessie was broken. I'm sure it's balance is fine. But it's size is effecting everything around it. Upscaling it will not break the ship, it will only change it's balance. It might even make it better. So what's the harm?

http://i668.photobucket.com/albums/vv46/Ni...gcloudscopy.png
Image turned into a URL because it made your sig too tall. -Zuke
|Ashes and Draya's Epic Adventure|Ashes "Nighthawk" Yotaka|Nightfall|Eva Jones|
[5:50:49 PM] JakeSG (William Darkmoor) says: I like you, Ashes. You're more cynical than God.
[Image: SLRU.png]
 
Offline Curios
05-07-2010, 02:28 PM,
#34
Member
Posts: 2,719
Threads: 88
Joined: Sep 2009

*facepalm*

Well, i see thread went NO U style anyway, all arguments and thoughts are already told.

*pushing eject button*

[Image: lowlevelf16ejection.jpg]

[Image: bhglogo.png]
Offline pipboy
05-07-2010, 02:30 PM,
#35
Member
Posts: 1,122
Threads: 19
Joined: May 2007

' Wrote:*facepalm*

Well, is see thread went NO U style anyway, all arguments and thoughts are already told.
Uh, no it didn't...

We're having a very civil and intelligent discussion here involving logic and stats. Then you posted. Please keep to the discussion or just don't post.

[Image: harlcopy.png]
 
Offline tansytansey
05-07-2010, 02:32 PM,
#36
Member
Posts: 4,099
Threads: 67
Joined: Aug 2008

I merely present facts. You presented what you thought to be correct, and I proved otherwise.

http://i668.photobucket.com/albums/vv46/Ni...gcloudscopy.png
Image turned into a URL because it made your sig too tall. -Zuke
|Ashes and Draya's Epic Adventure|Ashes "Nighthawk" Yotaka|Nightfall|Eva Jones|
[5:50:49 PM] JakeSG (William Darkmoor) says: I like you, Ashes. You're more cynical than God.
[Image: SLRU.png]
 
Offline Linkus
05-07-2010, 02:45 PM, (This post was last modified: 05-07-2010, 02:46 PM by Linkus.)
#37
Member
Posts: 4,027
Threads: 155
Joined: Mar 2008

I like consistency.
I don't like retconning ships like this.
Balance it in another way instead of changing it's size in a completely silly and OOC way.

Rip off a gun, hurt it's power core.

Just don't solve it by smashing any sort of continuity.





Facilitating the rise of robotics since 0 A.D.
 
Offline Prysin
05-07-2010, 02:47 PM,
#38
Apex Predator
Posts: 3,099
Threads: 165
Joined: Jul 2009

x2 times upscale.... best resize suggestion imo. Its still small, but not ridiculously small.

[Image: v1zVWKX.png]
DHC Discord
Offline McNeo
05-07-2010, 02:47 PM, (This post was last modified: 05-07-2010, 02:48 PM by McNeo.)
#39
Member
Posts: 3,424
Threads: 52
Joined: Aug 2006

People copying Ench need to be shot. Looking at you Curios.

As I said in my invis'd post, if this was submitted as a finished ship a month or two ago, we might have seen it come in and replace the smaller current Kusari Destroyer. But at the stage cruiser balance is at now, I'd put the chances of that happening pretty low unless Mjolnir gets behind it.

As to my vote? Haven't voted. What's going to happen is going to happen anyway. No one looks at forum votes.
Oh, and I am KNF aren't I:rolleyes:
 
Offline n00bl3t
05-07-2010, 02:53 PM, (This post was last modified: 05-07-2010, 02:54 PM by n00bl3t.)
#40
Member
Posts: 7,448
Threads: 108
Joined: Mar 2008

' Wrote:Someone present a reason as to why it shouldn't resized when there are no technical limitations preventing that from happening.

A reason that isn't utter trash and doesn't involve pulling things out of rear-ends like that junk I saw about the Sabre.

A reason that can not be reduced to "OLOL IT'S A VANILLA SHIP" either.

Oh wait.

There won't be any.

None that can't be dismissed as personal bias or trashtalk.[/size][/b]

' Wrote:We just need to see how the new capital ship revisions work out before trying to change anything around...

That is my reason.

Oh, yes, I am completely biased as [KNF] as well. I am also biased as ]bd[. Point of humour, I actually have a BD cruiser, but not a KNF destroyer.

[Image: hG0lGaj.png]
Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.
Pages (19): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 … 19 Next »
Thread Closed 


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode