Battleship Vs Fighters - Balance

[Traxit]

The way "Balance" works in this game is basically numbers, 5 heavy battletransports can take care of a single battleship.

battleships can't take care of snubs efficiently(provided you have anti-cap installed on your BS and not Solaris Gatling)
these battleships shouldn't fly alone then, they should have a gunboat or snubs flying with it, if fighters think they can take a battleship down, let them try, but it's your responsibility to make sure they don't, so you either run away, or you call for backup.

IRL, you don't see a single battleship cruising on its own, it probably has frigates and other smaller ships cruising with it along with some AA equipped vessels.

point is, a battleship is a battleship, whether it be an anti-snub one or an anti-cap one, it still has weaknesses, and those people use those weaknesses against you.

It's a game

That's a crappy excuse, this is a game that takes the Roleplay aspect and puts it IN the game, comparing IRL to a game which heavily relies on the Roleplay aspect is totally valid...

---

The best Video Game OST
Just Got Better

[Epo]

Well, sometimes is kinda hard to gather some support due to lack of people online. And well, npc spawnning command for carriers would fix this situation, but it's difficult to do.
And well, to be honest, this thread already has 7 pages and nothing will be done with it.
The only solution is logging only with some friends, otherwise die or don't log either.
True is that some people are just blue-hungry, and nothing can change them.
So, addapt to the game or die in pain. It should be Disco's main doctrine

[Wesker]

The way "Balance" works in this game is basically numbers, 5 heavy battletransports can take care of a single battleship.

battleships can't take care of snubs efficiently(provided you have anti-cap installed on your BS and not Solaris Gatling)
these battleships shouldn't fly alone then, they should have a gunboat or snubs flying with it, if fighters think they can take a battleship down, let them try, but it's your responsibility to make sure they don't, so you either run away, or you call for backup.

IRL, you don't see a single battleship cruising on its own, it probably has frigates and other smaller ships cruising with it along with some AA equipped vessels.

point is, a battleship is a battleship, whether it be an anti-snub one or an anti-cap one, it still has weaknesses, and those people use those weaknesses against you.

It's a game

That's a crappy excuse, this is a game that takes the Roleplay aspect and puts it IN the game, comparing IRL to a game which heavily relies on the Roleplay aspect is totally valid...

Do you hear yourself talk. Lol

---

[Fluffyball]

I'm not voting on this poll. Comparing this game to real life scenarios is abstract and shows that you have taken the "game" way too seriously and are clutching at proverbial straws to apply science to sci-fi because "reasons".

I must admit that real life comparison in sci-fi such as this is unavoidable, because all "classic" sci-fi tactics and combat are based onto WW2/Pacific War naval tactics - with destroyers, fighters, bombers, carriers.

---

User was banned for: http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=138636
Time left: (Permanent)

[Traxit]

I'm not voting on this poll. Comparing this game to real life scenarios is abstract and shows that you have taken the "game" way too seriously and are clutching at proverbial straws to apply science to sci-fi because "reasons".

I must admit that real life comparison in sci-fi such as this is unavoidable, because all "classic" sci-fi tactics and combat are based onto WW2/Pacific War naval tactics - with destroyers, fighters, bombers, carriers.

This, and whine however you want @Wesker, but a battleship is vulnerable while flying alone so I don't see the point of this thread. when you get outnumbered, whether it be Battletransports, VHFs, Bombers, most cases you will not survive the encounter.

---

The best Video Game OST
Just Got Better

[SnakeLancerHaven]

wesker pls

---

R.I.P Tabris...
Youtube - Twitch - My old Account

[Wesker]

I'm not voting on this poll. Comparing this game to real life scenarios is abstract and shows that you have taken the "game" way too seriously and are clutching at proverbial straws to apply science to sci-fi because "reasons".

I must admit that real life comparison in sci-fi such as this is unavoidable, because all "classic" sci-fi tactics and combat are based onto WW2/Pacific War naval tactics - with destroyers, fighters, bombers, carriers.

This, and whine however you want @Wesker, but a battleship is vulnerable while flying alone so I don't see the point of this thread. when you get outnumbered, whether it be Battletransports, VHFs, Bombers, most cases you will not survive the encounter.

A battleship can be vaulnerable to Bombers but not fighters.

---

[Wesker]

wesker pls

[:

---

[Titan*]

A battleship can be vaulnerable to Bombers but not fighters.

This

See Homeworld as example, send Battlecruiser into 5 assault fighter squadron (each squadron have 5 ship this means 25 fighter) Battlecruiser can destroy them all without taking heavy damage (maybe BC will lost %10-15 hullpoints)

But send Battlecruiser to 5 bomber squadron, You will lose your battlecruiser

[Traxit]

A battleship can be vaulnerable to Bombers but not fighters.

This

See Homeworld as example, send Battlecruiser into 5 assault fighter squadron (each squadron have 5 ship this means 25 fighter) Battlecruiser can destroy them all without taking heavy damage (maybe BC will lost %10-15 hullpoints)

But send Battlecruiser to 5 bomber squadron, You will lose your battlecruiser

You're comparing a different Sci-Fi universe to Disco, Obviously the game was balanced so that Fighters are no match to Battlecruisers, but this is disco, not Homeworld.

---

The best Video Game OST
Just Got Better