• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 82 83 84 85 86 780 Next »
AI ID - adjustment proposal

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (6): 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
AI ID - adjustment proposal
Offline HassLHoFF™
01-19-2016, 07:22 PM, (This post was last modified: 01-19-2016, 10:02 PM by HassLHoFF™.)
#1
Member
Posts: 1,064
Threads: 80
Joined: Jun 2012

As the current AI ID is still an advanced Freelancer ID by it's mechanics. I thought once again in improving it in a way that makes sense and balancing it that it won't become a terrorist ID.


Code:
The current ID is:

Can attack any ship in self-defense or in defense of another AI ship.
Can attack any ship in systems that do not contain a jumpgate.
Cannot attack transports and freighters, except in self-defense.
Cannot use any transports with more than 3,600 cargo.
Cannot participate in unlawful actions except as described above.

Allowed ships: Fighters, Freighters, Transports, Gunboats, AI Cruiser

In comparison to this I add the former AI ID that had been used until 2012/2013.


Code:
The former ID (2012) was:

Can attack any ship in self-defense or in defense of another AI ship.
Can attack any ship in systems that do not contain a jumpgate.
Cannot use any transports with more than 4,200 cargo.
Cannot participate in unlawful actions except as described above.

Allowed ships: Fighters, Freighters, Transports, Gunboats, AI Cruiser


Except a balancing thought behind, I totally can't understand the exception of transports in a realistic way. Referring to the denominator most people agree with, that the AI strongly relies much in gathering resources I think there is a place for improvement. Keeping in mind that, the a ship itself can be seen as a carrier of resources my suggestion is quite easy.


Code:
ID suggestion is:

Can attack any ship in self-defense or in defense of another AI ship.
Can attack any ship that is a gunboat or higher class in systems that do not contain a jumpgate.
Can attack any ship that is a transport above 3,600 cargo in systems that do not contain a jumpgate.
Cannot participate in unlawful actions except as described above.

Allowed ships: Sentinel class (AI Drone), Harvester class (AI Cruiser)

Defining the excepted vessels as non-effective in containing resource and non-dangerous in class, basically allows to act and play AI in a realistic way without being unbalanced resulting into a terrorist ID. In addition, the ship usage should be limited to the AI ships only. Another factor could be added in the allowance of demanding metal/ metal ore commodities and scrap/premium scrap.

[Image: xwkBvsU.png]
Information and Feedback - Recruitment


[Image: q5x9eiN.png]
Information - Feedback
Reply  
Offline The Savage
01-19-2016, 07:25 PM, (This post was last modified: 01-19-2016, 07:29 PM by The Savage.)
#2
Probation
Posts: 1,034
Threads: 60
Joined: Nov 2015

(01-19-2016, 07:22 PM)Genexus Wrote: Can attack any ship in systems that do not contain a jumpgate.

This line is fine, given not at AI are the good guys fancy a chatter and tea AND there's not too much systems without jumpgate connection - so this is not too OP, as seen onto NavMap.

Have you ever heard about Berzerker Drones?
Reply  
Offline Laura C.
01-19-2016, 07:29 PM, (This post was last modified: 01-19-2016, 07:30 PM by Laura C..)
#3
Member
Posts: 1,445
Threads: 51
Joined: Dec 2011

(01-19-2016, 07:22 PM)Genexus Wrote: Defining the excepted vessels as non-effective in containing resource and non-dangerous in class, basically allows to act and play AI in a realistic way without being unbalanced resulting into a terrorist ID.
Without ZOI limitation (like the one with limitation only to systems without jumpgate which is on current ID) you actually created terrorist ID, because it can attack large transports anywhere even without need for issuing demands.

On a ragebreak. Or ragequit. Time will tell.
Reply  
Offline Laz
01-19-2016, 07:30 PM,
#4
Out-of Retirement Code Monkey
Posts: 1,912
Threads: 107
Joined: Jan 2014

(01-19-2016, 07:25 PM)FluffReborn Wrote:
(01-19-2016, 07:22 PM)Genexus Wrote: Can attack any ship in systems that do not contain a jumpgate.

This line is fine, given not at AI are the good guys fancy a chatter and tea AND there's not too much systems without jumpgate connection - so this is not too OP, as seen onto NavMap.

Have you ever heard about Berzerker Drones?

So many would disagree with you there. And it really depends from AI to AI..... PRIME mostly in my experience would say they are hostile to everyone.... despite me RP'ing differently.

Reply  
Offline The Savage
01-19-2016, 07:31 PM,
#5
Probation
Posts: 1,034
Threads: 60
Joined: Nov 2015

I can't say if AI are one faction on they are generic IFF for non-human entities, except for Nomads. It was just an opinion in here, since it would be logical there would be some HK drones, killing everything around.
Reply  
Offline HassLHoFF™
01-19-2016, 07:31 PM, (This post was last modified: 01-19-2016, 07:32 PM by HassLHoFF™.)
#6
Member
Posts: 1,064
Threads: 80
Joined: Jun 2012

(01-19-2016, 07:25 PM)FluffReborn Wrote:
(01-19-2016, 07:22 PM)Genexus Wrote: Can attack any ship in systems that do not contain a jumpgate.

This line is fine, given not at AI are the good guys AND there's not too much systems without jumpgate connection - so this is not too OP, as seen onto NavMap. Have you heard about Berzerker Drones?

Of course, even though it still feels a little random. Propably there could be an improvement with adding the demanding option.
Bezerker Drones? I guess you mean the Harvester Drones, right? Bezerker was formerly the term for the AI Cruiser.

[Image: xwkBvsU.png]
Information and Feedback - Recruitment


[Image: q5x9eiN.png]
Information - Feedback
Reply  
Offline Laz
01-19-2016, 07:32 PM, (This post was last modified: 01-19-2016, 07:32 PM by Laz.)
#7
Out-of Retirement Code Monkey
Posts: 1,912
Threads: 107
Joined: Jan 2014

(01-19-2016, 07:22 PM)Genexus Wrote:
Code:
ID suggestion is:


Allowed ships: Sentinel class (AI Drone), Harvester class (AI Cruiser)
Seems like i said this not to long ago :/

Reply  
Offline The Savage
01-19-2016, 07:32 PM, (This post was last modified: 01-19-2016, 07:34 PM by The Savage.)
#8
Probation
Posts: 1,034
Threads: 60
Joined: Nov 2015

(01-19-2016, 07:31 PM)Genexus Wrote: Bezerker Drones? I guess you mean the Harvester Drones, right?

I was reffering to term of von Neumann probe variant.
Reply  
Offline HassLHoFF™
01-19-2016, 07:39 PM,
#9
Member
Posts: 1,064
Threads: 80
Joined: Jun 2012

(01-19-2016, 07:32 PM)FluffReborn Wrote:
(01-19-2016, 07:31 PM)Genexus Wrote: Bezerker Drones? I guess you mean the Harvester Drones, right?

I was reffering to term of von Neumann probe variant.

Of course, that even was discussed a couple times and even was the idea Jinx after modelling the vessels.

[Image: xwkBvsU.png]
Information and Feedback - Recruitment


[Image: q5x9eiN.png]
Information - Feedback
Reply  
Offline HassLHoFF™
01-19-2016, 07:42 PM, (This post was last modified: 01-19-2016, 07:44 PM by HassLHoFF™.)
#10
Member
Posts: 1,064
Threads: 80
Joined: Jun 2012

(01-19-2016, 07:32 PM)Laz Wrote:
(01-19-2016, 07:22 PM)Genexus Wrote:
Code:
ID suggestion is:


Allowed ships: Sentinel class (AI Drone), Harvester class (AI Cruiser)
Seems like i said this not to long ago :/

(01-19-2016, 07:31 PM)FluffReborn Wrote: I can't say if AI are one faction on they are generic IFF for non-human entities, except for Nomads. It was just an opinion in here, since it would be logical there would be some HK drones, killing everything around.

Well, I wasn't into this discussion, but my suggested alternative stays in creating a ship, mounting Freelancer ID on it and set the AI IFF then it's generic and directed to an intended RP.

[Image: xwkBvsU.png]
Information and Feedback - Recruitment


[Image: q5x9eiN.png]
Information - Feedback
Reply  
Pages (6): 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode