• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Developers Forum Discovery Unofficial Development Discovery Mod Content Submissions
« Previous 1 … 6 7 8 9 10 … 28 Next »
Geb Model (Poll)

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll: Which Model Do you want as the New Geb?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
A
52.83%
28 52.83%
B
39.62%
21 39.62%
Neither
7.55%
4 7.55%
Total 53 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3 Next »
Geb Model (Poll)
Offline TheShooter36
06-13-2016, 10:02 PM,
#11
Guardian of Oaths
Posts: 1,970
Threads: 228
Joined: Jul 2014

Combine the rear of V1 with front of V3 and please make sides of it something unique, not an osiris ripoff or LAC slapping.

Reply  
Offline Ace Razgriz
06-13-2016, 10:05 PM,
#12
Member
Posts: 833
Threads: 105
Joined: Feb 2013

Its kinda hard to "Really" not make an osiris rip here, although the Geb is still a shipclass of its own it is still a modified Osiris class, so thus I vote for option A, although I do not necessarilly like its final form.

[Image: alJxrNO.png]
Reply  
Offline Robert
06-13-2016, 10:15 PM,
#13
Member
Posts: 70
Threads: 8
Joined: Dec 2007

I personally like what you tried with the nose of A. I think the middle is to much as the osiris and the engines I do not really like. The shape of the engine cover looks strange for the dual engine setup.
Reply  
Offline Omicron
06-13-2016, 11:19 PM,
#14
The Order
Posts: 4,745
Threads: 386
Joined: Nov 2009

The Order HC votes for the A. We like what you did with it, with all the features we asked for included in.

Our current feedback:

1. Section dividing the front tubes looks rushed and has very odd shape. Consider making it a slightly longer runway for both upper and lower tube. Then you could get rid of yellow bits.
2. With how the tubes are orienated, having them angle slightly towards the sides will not hurt the idea.
3. The yellowish part behind the tubes needs flattenning, it doesn't look good right now.
4. Engines behind look like they could be made at least 1.5x bigger to take full use of ship's width and height. Consider adding one solid "engine panel" on their sides and remove much of the bulky armor overhead in exchange for more engine's section clearance and gun-emplacements near corners of the upper exhaust.

[Image: E9d8RnV.jpg?1]
Reply  
Offline Apollon
06-13-2016, 11:53 PM,
#15
Emperor's Wrath
Posts: 1,772
Threads: 101
Joined: May 2012

(06-13-2016, 08:57 PM)Durandal Wrote: I'll take the one that isn't a boring Osiris variant please.

Since when exactly are ships of the same shipline and tech not supposed to look the similar. Yeah, the lib dread and the LAC aren't supposed to look the same at all. Jeez that logic.

Anyway, I vote for A. I lke the model in overall, although could use a few tweakings as what @Omicron clarified. And better textures, the yellow strikes doesn't really fit in.
Reply  
Offline Jeremy Hunter
06-14-2016, 02:14 AM, (This post was last modified: 06-14-2016, 04:24 AM by Jeremy Hunter.)
#16
Member
Posts: 6,094
Threads: 200
Joined: Jul 2009

I enjoy first one, but I prefer the under dome to be made into something else. Sensor array or something.

[Image: jeremy10.png]
May you ever walk in the Light, Shizune.
Reply  
Offline Mercarryn
06-14-2016, 12:18 PM,
#17
Member
Posts: 980
Threads: 55
Joined: Jul 2011

Definetely version 1.
Fits the Geb`s lore of being a modified Osiris. Front to mid-section are well done, only the yellow stripes are bit too much.
Perhaps some smaller ones might do it.
The bridge could perhaps be put a bit more in the middle, but you can also leave it like that, this is just a minor issue I have with version 1.
Reply  
Offline TheFreelancer
06-14-2016, 01:01 PM,
#18
Member
Posts: 305
Threads: 19
Joined: Jan 2015

Option A looks epic imo, and it fits the line better than the current Geb!

^ A Massive Eejit ^
Reply  
Offline SnakeLancerHaven
06-14-2016, 02:06 PM,
#19
Volgograd Industrial
Posts: 2,873
Threads: 238
Joined: Feb 2012

Lol I just noticed the first model looks a little like the Coalition "Tempest" Carrier xddd

[Image: ?key=dc385ef2304f0cab6f94da42bc2ff703cf5...5BS0UucG5n]
R.I.P Tabris...
Youtube - Twitch - My old Account
  Reply  
Offline Thunderer
06-16-2016, 02:16 PM, (This post was last modified: 06-16-2016, 02:17 PM by Thunderer.)
#20
Tea Disposal Unit
Posts: 5,611
Threads: 463
Joined: Jul 2011

A looks nice, but also like a resized Resheph.

B is both unique and looks nice. It doesn't look like the Kushan destroyer if I don't make an effort. I voted for it.

I think that the engines need different textures. It's hard to replicate Osiris engines, but you can model them after those of the LAC.

[Image: 396AUfe.png]
Bretonian Treaty Database Bretonian Armed Forces Recruitment Center
Bretonian Charter of Interstellar Law Bretonian Secrets Act
Reply  
Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode